Yes, very nice, well made, (FWD) performance sedans. One of their worst attributs is high resale .maxnix wrote:Gen II Legends (especially GS 6MT) were the second choice of a few on this board.
Are we talking about the same Legend? The legend was one of the greatest cars of all time IMO. The C32 made 200hp, which was phenomanal for a honda at the time. It was also one of the first cars to use the double wishbone suspension. It was in no way a "pinto to the Q", nor was it weak.CrimsonQ wrote:a legend is like a pinto to the Q. Sorry ive owned 1 (not by choice) FWD , need i say more? v6? huh? weakness. but to each his own
CrimsonQ wrote:i hate hondas
Oh....That explains it...CrimsonQ wrote:i hate hondas
It was a great car from an engineering perspective. Handling and acceleration were without question very good. Everything about it seemed well-synchronized and well put together.bassinasilvia wrote:Are we talking about the same Legend? The legend was one of the greatest cars of all time IMO. The C32 made 200hp, which was phenomanal for a honda at the time. It was also one of the first cars to use the double wishbone suspension. It was in no way a "pinto to the Q", nor was it weak.
bad choice of name for the car eh? i jsut bought a 93 accord for my daily driver while we build our muscle car. god i forgot how much fwd sucks. honda forums suck too. nico rules!! at least its not a toyota. i can't stand the average toyota driver. bastards pull in front of you and don't accelerate or make sure to go at least 10 miles below the speed limit for safety. but honda boys are all ricers with big cf wings and fartcans. goddammit. i miss my q and maxima.Jesda wrote:The Legend will be forgotten, because it was designed to be ignored.
Same thoughts here, but I'd opt for a Type-II 94 with the 6 speed.pito11213 wrote:You guys are insane. A 93 Acura legend with the type 2 is a beautiful car. Try to out handle one and see just how crappy one is. Those cars come factory to take turns at 90 and 100. I must admit the acceleration from a roll while in Drive sucks but put it donw to D3 and you have a different car.
I'm sorry, but I have to post this. This is the blue book value of a 1993 Infiniti Q45 with GOOD mechanical and cosmetics with approximated 130,000 miles.Private Party Value Search Local Listings | List This Car for Sale $2,230CrimsonQ wrote:a legend is like a pinto to the Q. Sorry ive owned 1 (not by choice) FWD , need i say more? v6? huh? weakness. but to each his own
Note that resale value also compensates for the cost of repairs to retain as-new performance and safety. The G50 Q is a more complex vehicle thats more difficult and expensive to service and own. Desirability doesn't necessarily translate into higher luxury resale. Consider also Honda's strong reputation for long-term reliability, which always results in higher resale value.zinkie13 wrote:I'm sorry, but I have to post this. This is the blue book value of a 1993 Infiniti Q45 with GOOD mechanical and cosmetics with approximated 130,000 miles.Private Party Value Search Local Listings | List This Car for Sale $2,230
Now this is the value of an Acure Legend 4 door LS sedan that is automatic, and in good mechanical and cosmetic shape with approximately 130,000 miles.Private Party Value Search Local Listings | List This Car for Sale $5,205
Falkdesigns wrote:
Well, actually I believe it is 'that' simple. Ya see, people spend money to buy vehicles, and then they spend money to maintain them. All I'm saying is that if there was something remarkably spectacular about the G50 then it would be worth more, but it isn't. I would venture to say that the G50 Q45 holds its value probably worse than any car made in the 90's even if it was extremely well maintained. Its a great car, it just isn't worth anything monetarily.Jesda wrote:Note that resale value also compensates for the cost of repairs to retain as-new performance and safety. The G50 Q is a more complex vehicle thats more difficult and expensive to service and own. Desirability doesn't necessarily translate into higher luxury resale. Consider also Honda's strong reputation for long-term reliability, which always results in higher resale value.
Youre oversimplifying the economics of the used car market.
I dont recall any G50 owner claiming their car had high resale value. You're confusing me, my friend.zinkie13 wrote:ts a great car, it just isn't worth anything monetarily.