I take it back. Z knows best. And I thought 5 honorably outshined M in this test. Kim Reynolds comparison stinks. I can't believe this comparison went past through the editor. First of all, how can you make comparison tests without showing hard facts, datas, numbers to support your results. I probably got used to comparisons tests done by Consumer Reports and was expecting the same scientific analysis required in testing these cars and analyzing datas. His attempt in using artsy creative writing using vineyards and integrating it in this comparison tests doesn't make sense.
I just wasted my time going to Fry's to check this magazine. I wasted 4 bucks expecting factual, number crunching data combined with subjective comments from whoever was part of this test. Right now, I'm just wasting myself supportng my reasons why this comparisons sucks, when I can just write "Don't buy this issue!" . ONE-ZERO. This comparison test does not even bring justice to the winner 5.
Modified by Edong t5 at 9:45 PM 10/6/2005