MPG, I don't believe you.

ONLY for ADVANCED technical discussion about the 240sx!
PHeller
Posts: 222
Joined: Wed Dec 24, 2008 8:18 pm
Car: 1998 Ford ZX2 (wrecked) now 1989 Coupe

Post

People talk of 28 and 30 miles per gallon.

I don't believe them.

I've got fine looking plugs (old but clean).

I've got wires in good shape.

I've got a brand new O2 Sensor.

My car runs awesome.

I get 24 MPG driving like your grandmother in the snow...following an Amish buggy. Any amount of fun lead to 20MPG, which it seems I've been average per tank. Most miles so far was 306 miles/13.3 gallons.

Am I missing something secret that's affecting my MPG by 3-5MPGs?


User avatar
ashoe
Posts: 111
Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 5:22 am
Car: 1996 nissan 240sx se, 2006 subaru wrx

Post

I am totally serious. Filled up today 12.4 gallons 357 miles. I always get within a mile or two of thirty, and i don't drive like a grandmother. The only thing i do to improve my mileage is synthetic fluids in the engine, trans and diff, and shifting into fourth or fifth anytime i'm not accellerating. I run premium in the winter because its the only gas that doesn't contain 10% ethanol around here.Check the gap on your plugs, just because they are clean doesn't mean they're working right.

User avatar
2projects2many
Posts: 229
Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2006 3:50 pm
Car: '91 S13 SR20DET

Post

OP= are you running 5-spd or autotragic? that will make a 3-5 mpg difference as well.

PHeller
Posts: 222
Joined: Wed Dec 24, 2008 8:18 pm
Car: 1998 Ford ZX2 (wrecked) now 1989 Coupe

Post

Manual

357 miles? Jeez...

Did you do anything recently that might have helped that mileage? Plug wires? Engine rebuild? exhaust? intake?

I can't figure out where I'm losing so much efficiency.

User avatar
ashoe
Posts: 111
Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 5:22 am
Car: 1996 nissan 240sx se, 2006 subaru wrx

Post

Nope. Nothing major. Mostly just trying to keep it running till i get the funds for a swap together. It seems like the dual cam engines get better mileage than the single cam engines? Mine has good compression and leakdown. Whats your wheel/tire setup? I run the stock ones most of the time because the bigger wheels i have just kill my mileage.

PHeller
Posts: 222
Joined: Wed Dec 24, 2008 8:18 pm
Car: 1998 Ford ZX2 (wrecked) now 1989 Coupe

Post

Stock.

Stock everything.

Vegascorbin
Posts: 732
Joined: Sat Nov 24, 2007 9:56 am
Car: 1990 240sx dirt track race car

Post

Yoou may be not loosing anything. Different parts of hte country run different bleds of gasoline. A better comparison for you to make is what are others in your same reagion (useing the same blend etc.) getting for MPG?

Alot of things can make a diferance includeing altitude, humidity, fuel blend, road conditions.

The other thing to look for is a change in MPG. It can be an early sign of problems.

Just make sure that you are comparing apples to apples.

DJ_Sunrise
Posts: 64
Joined: Sat Apr 03, 2004 6:42 am

Post

Pheller.. I feel your pain. I get about 220mpt on my S14. 15.9 gallon tank, and I usually fill up about 15 gallons. I was getting 180ish for the last few weeks. Last weekend when my car reached two hundred some odd.. I nearly crapped myself. I drive like a grandma... never more than the speed limit. It hurts.. I know.. considering I get about half the gas mileage everyone else reports. One week during the summer I paid $60 to fill up my car... I can't even remember how many times I've paid in the 50s... Ughhh.. shoot me.

-Bart

User avatar
masterdisaster
Posts: 193
Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2008 5:58 pm
Car: 1991 JDM 180SX

Post

yuuup.. sound right .. i get 30mpg on my s13 sr20det.. and pretty sure i'd do more if i did more highway.

i always take off slow but still hit a bit of boost in 2nd gear and over

User avatar
Philipio
Posts: 1150
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 1:35 pm
Car: 96 240sx, 96 Miata
Location: DFW, Texas
Contact:

Post

I actually get a lot less on the highway due to the higher RPM. When I do primarily city driving on a tank, the speed limit's 40 and I cruse in 5th gear.

I generally fill up before 12 gallons and have around 270 if I've done a lot of city driving, around 210 if primarily highway.

User avatar
rms13Mike
Posts: 71
Joined: Sun Oct 19, 2008 3:46 am
Car: 1992 Nissan 240sx Fastback, 2005 Toyota Corrolla S, 1990 Toyota Camry, 1998 Honda Accord LX-V6
Location: Cabazon/Moreno Valley, CA
Contact:

Post

i used to barely get around 275 miles for about 11-13 gallons, then i started using fuel system cleaner and it got better over time, i tried to avoid racing my engine too. and i get around 300 now. the most i got was around 350-360 i think. yeup yeup. try that or changing your fuel filter, and like what the other guy said, check your spark plug gaps

PHeller
Posts: 222
Joined: Wed Dec 24, 2008 8:18 pm
Car: 1998 Ford ZX2 (wrecked) now 1989 Coupe

Post

Z32 Fuel filter as of a month ago. So we're good there.

Just did wires and checked the gap. They were at .045, but they were normal non-thin wire plugs, so that could have something to do with it.

Looking at picking up a set of NGK Iridiums.

User avatar
masterdisaster
Posts: 193
Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2008 5:58 pm
Car: 1991 JDM 180SX

Post

iridium :S ... that's a nono in my book .. BRK6ES and change them ever 5 months

User avatar
alfsnissan
Posts: 175
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 1:52 pm
Car: 1995 Nissan 240SX

Post

I get 26 mpg with my manual. Not a whole lot of city miles but some. Not a lot done to the motor, but new o2 sensors, cat, air filter, good plugs, good tires at proper inflation.

User avatar
Azrial
Posts: 284
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2008 12:07 pm
Car: 93 240sx vert, 1990 pignose hatchback roller

Post

I wonder what difference the air makes in CO to PA. Isn't the air thinner or something in CO.

I think i get around 20 some odd mpg my vert was an auto but now it's 5spd so it should do better. Well once I get the hang of driving it as a stick. If you haven't done a tune up recently I would go ahead and change distributor cap rotor button plugs and wires and see if it makes a difference. Every place you ever buy plugs from claim they are pre gapped generally but they are always off. Also like the one guy said different places get different gas blends. I would try going to a different station and buying gas. They all get the same blend of gas in a given area but depending on the company they all have different chemicals they add in before distributing the gas to the station.

User avatar
kainvamp
Posts: 401
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2007 11:36 am
Car: '91 Sil80 w/ SR

Post

i just filled up today and got 11.47 gallons to 333 miles. thats 29mpg. only use 93 octane. I drive pretty aggressively most of the time too, but many are highway miles.

I was getting around 25 most of the time, but after my alignment and oil change, its been consistently 27-29mpg.

its on mainly stock sr with front mount, 12psi, and 4 bar fuel pressure, z32 fuel filter, NGK bkr6's or bkr7's copper plugs gapped at .33, AFR is 12-12.5 high throttle and like 14-15 just cruisin. runs great. hopefully goin to the track tonight to see what it gets on the 1/4 mile finally.

User avatar
superficialfilter
Posts: 99
Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2008 12:56 pm
Car: 1997 240sx se

Post

Have you tried checking your tire pressure? I'm not saying it will be completely responsible for your bad mileage but if their low it won't be helping it.

I just took a trip in my 97 and got 476 miles out of 15.403 gallons on the highway. Around town I've been getting 25-27mpg depending on how I drive. All I've done is put a header, intake, and electric fans on it.


Onizuka
Posts: 8450
Joined: Wed Nov 06, 2002 5:24 pm
Car: 91 Nissan S13 coupe SR20DET
89 Nissan S14 hatch SR20DE

Post

Most people who report 30mpg highway have a SR swap. I got 24-26 on the ol' KA24DE and 30-31 on the SR20DET (highway that is).

User avatar
gtd65
Posts: 331
Joined: Mon Nov 25, 2002 11:24 am
Car: 1995 240SX SE
Location: Sarasota, FL & Galashiels, Scotland
Contact:

Post

<--- This 95 S14 normally gets around 24mpg which I think is pretty reasonable for an older car with a cat really.

Remember, unless you are zeroing the trip meter and brimming the car (not just the first click) each time you fill up, the MPG calculation is not accurate.

User avatar
onosqv
Posts: 5675
Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2002 12:32 pm
Car: '92 240sx Vert
Contact:

Post

What A LOT of people don't realize is that their speedo is usually off. If you use a GPS w/ speedo and compare your #'s, you may see that it can be off anywhere from 5-10% at higher speeds.

User avatar
Firewind
Posts: 130
Joined: Fri May 19, 2006 2:20 pm
Car: 240SX

Post

I got 24MPG most often when I drove light. Thing is, I am getting less MPG because I am running slightly wider tires, stock on S13 is 195/60/15R, and I have 205/60/15R that a lone can cause a change and fuel economy, let alone a difference on the speedo since my tires are slightly larger. So keep that in mind. I could most likely pull more MPG now since I have learned to have a more steady foot.

User avatar
Dimitri
Posts: 80
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2004 8:57 am
Car: 1990 240SX Red Hatchback-
Oui c'est un 240sx et non ce n'est pas à vendre
Location: California

Post

Doing only really short trips in city traffic , I get 12-14 MPG. No highway/freeway driving lately since I started keeping track.

Although I have made it from Los angeles to Las Vegas on a single full tank some years ago.


User avatar
gtd65
Posts: 331
Joined: Mon Nov 25, 2002 11:24 am
Car: 1995 240SX SE
Location: Sarasota, FL & Galashiels, Scotland
Contact:

Post

At the moment I'm working over in Holland and bought myself a cheap run around in the shape of a Proton Persona (it's basically a Mitsubishi Lancer with some styling revisions built in Malaysia).



Well last year, gas was around $9 a gallon (almost $10 at the peak) so I decided to try some of this "hypermiling" stuff that I'd previously read about.

So basically in May I started the test of more conservative driving styles - can you spot the change in MPG The figures are "Imperial" MPG. US MPG is about 15% lower roughly.




Modified by gtd65 at 3:03 AM 4/29/2009

User avatar
ShaunakaRichard
Posts: 122
Joined: Mon Jul 10, 2006 8:08 pm
Car: 92' 240sx sr20det Redtop

Post

Ya the speedo is off at higher speeds but the odometer is still on. I used a GPS to compare and yes the speedo is definitely off over 55mph. But odometer was still near spot on.

User avatar
onosqv
Posts: 5675
Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2002 12:32 pm
Car: '92 240sx Vert
Contact:

Post

ShaunakaRichard wrote:Ya the speedo is off at higher speeds but the odometer is still on. I used a GPS to compare and yes the speedo is definitely off over 55mph. But odometer was still near spot on.
As far as I'm concerned, the odometer is driven directly from the speedo...

You won't notice 5-10%+ differences in the odometer immediately just by looking @ it, it will equate to a good 30 miles or so off 300 miles - adds up & gives false readings.

User avatar
SullivanRacing06
Posts: 1974
Joined: Sat Apr 21, 2007 8:45 am
Car: r32 gtst, 06 350z, r32 gtr, rs4 steaga, 04 350z, f350/6bt
Location: Gainesville

Post

i get around 25mpg on the interstate out or a 6 cyl

User avatar
ShaunakaRichard
Posts: 122
Joined: Mon Jul 10, 2006 8:08 pm
Car: 92' 240sx sr20det Redtop

Post

Well whatever you want to believe. Taking a 180 mile trip and having the numbers differ by tenths of a mile is pretty damn close I think. And fyi, just because nissan made the face plate disproportional doesn't mean the odometer isn't correct. Odometer reads the same signal the speedo does, if theres a probelm with the speedo it won't effect the odometer. Speedo doesn't drive the odometer. Both get their signal from the sensor on the transmission.

User avatar
onosqv
Posts: 5675
Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2002 12:32 pm
Car: '92 240sx Vert
Contact:

Post

I haven't looked @ the analog cluster in a while, but the digital HUD cluster I run has the odometer running directly off the speedo unit.

Even 5% off (which is fairly standard in the 240's I've seen all over So Cal) will affect your total mpg readings. It's not as noticeable @ lower speeds because 5% equates to very small tenths, as you have said. However, it equates to 15 miles in 300 (about a tank of gas), which means the difference between reporting 25 mpg & 23.7 mpg w/ 12 gallons of gas.

This isn't THAT big of a deal, but it does affect it; also, I've noticed depending on how much highway you driver, the % off is higher. The OP is talking about 3-5 mpg difference in reporting per tank & something as simple as this is definitely a contributing factor.

User avatar
jeff420
Posts: 848
Joined: Tue May 01, 2007 9:46 pm
Car: too many to fathom

Post

when i got my 240 the origional motor got 27-28 mpg driving slightly aggressive. the motor i just dropped in is getting 25mpg consistantly with no emmisions and a s***ty transmission thats going to lock up on me any day. with the first engine i had a different j30 rear end than im running now. i dont know if j30's came with different gear ratios.

SRprelude
Posts: 20
Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2009 7:43 pm
Car: 1996 nissan 240sx se

Post

yea, Im 22-25 mpg depending how i drive my SR20..... and thats as good or better than my KA was


Return to “240SX Technical Forum”