I'm probably going to end up repeating a lot of what Joe said as he covered it pretty well but here's my view.
dopamine wrote:I have a couple questions about past and present motors. First, why is the inline 6 (or inline anything) not being used anymore? If you look at the toyota supra (90s) nissan skyline (90s-02) or 240SX, they all have inline engines and tremendous power potential. The new GTR is a V6, as is the 350z, and i'm sure the next Supra will have changed as well. And yes im aware that the 300ZX has a V6 in it, but that was clearly a mistake as many 300ZX owners (me being one) will agree. Trying to work on one is almost impossible.
As Joe touched on it, the problem with inline 6's are that they are both tall and long... for a sports car this isn't really good when it comes to the corners. Being tall raises the car's center of gravity and being long pushes the weight distribution forward. With a compact V6, both of these are eliminated making potential handling much, much better. This is one of the biggest reasons the JGTC R34 GT-R with the turbo VQ30 was faster than the RB26 equipped JGTC R34 GT-R.
One reason a lot of people liked the I6's was that they are a naturally balanced engine making them very, very smooth (low to no vibrations). The V6's these days though are also quite smooth with very minimal vibrations.
Joe mentioned BMW doing inline 6's... another interesting one to note is Hyundai... they actually did a front wheel drive inline 6 in one of their cars.
Generally the inline engines are easier to work on... but personally, I wouldn't give up handling for slightly more accessibility. Actually, the big reason why the Z32 300ZX is hard to work on is those heads... those suckers are just massive. The SOHC VG is definitely much easier to work on. One small reason why I'm using the SOHC VG in my Z32 instead of the DOHC VG.
Quote »Second, Why have all the new sports cars gone N/A? The 90's horsepower wars were an exciting time for nissan, mazda, toyota, and maybe mitsubishi. All turbocharged, all performance, right off the line. I was too young to drive back then, but now i am fascinated by these machines. All seemingly ahead of their time, and then gone in just a few years. The world just wasn't ready for these monsterous cars and was sadly more interested in hauling the kids around in big ugly SUVs. [/quote]As Joe said, there are still quite a few turbocharged cars out there. I think emissions might have had something to do with it... though they claim turbo engines are a bit easier to do emissions wise so I'm not sure. These days though, with fuel going like it is high compression NA cars will tend to get better fuel economy which may be a bigger selling point to some. Regardless... the VQ35 is an awesome engine. It now currently holds the record for fastest Nissan in the 1/4 mile in a built drag car. Nissan should also be coming out with the 370Z soon which will be rated as having more power output than the 300ZX was rated it. It will be interesting to see how it compares to the Z32.
Quote »The RX-8 is a terrible follow up to the RX-7. No low end torque, and horrible times at the 1/4 mile and 0-60.[/quote]That's actually how the rotary engine works... they build torque as they rev. I'd be interested to see how the RX-7 compares to an NA RX-7, that would definitely be a much better comparison. If they came out with a turbo version it would probably do pretty good compared to the RX-7. I've driven an RX-7 and it was a bit disappointing as far as acceleration but they sure to handle quite well.