It'd screw up weight distribution though. All that extra mass is going to throw it off and affect handling.superskunk wrote:people are tired of the conventional swaps... that would be a pretty good power to weight ratio if the VQ swap ever happend....
SR was avalable in FWD layouts, too. B13 and B14 Sentra SE-Rs came from the factory with SRs. Early SE B15s had the SR, too, before the switch to the QG18. The Pulsar outside the US came with a turbo SR in the GTiR variant. The G20 also came with a FWD SR here in the US.Reed19x wrote:But, here's a list of the SR engines. The SR20DET being the most popular to swap into 240s. People claim to have swapped them into Sentra's/SE-R's as well, which is a small FWD car like the Versa (obviously different though)...
ROFL, they came with SR'sReed19x wrote:But, here's a list of the SR engines. The SR20DET being the most popular to swap into 240s. People claim to have swapped them into Sentra's/SE-R's as wel
Age means nothing, especially when you're comparing economy motors. The SR was designed to make lots of power from the factory in a number of cars. The MR18 is not. Nissan made some fantastic motors in the past that are still superior to anything they make today (like the VH45DE V8).Red Devil wrote:Don't understand the idea for any swap that places an older engine into the car.
Could matter in legality though. Emissions states have laws against it and then the ones that require a working OBD2 port for emissions checks.MinisterofDOOM wrote:
Age means nothing, especially when you're comparing economy motors. The SR was designed to make lots of power from the factory in a number of cars. The MR18 is not. Nissan made some fantastic motors in the past that are still superior to anything they make today (like the VH45DE V8).
Chevy's small block V8 is a very old core design and yet superior to almost anything else out there.
Age is not relevant. The PURPOSE and engineering that went into the motor is what matters.
I'm talking about age of the motor, not design.MinisterofDOOM wrote:
Age means nothing, especially when you're comparing economy motors. The SR was designed to make lots of power from the factory in a number of cars. The MR18 is not. Nissan made some fantastic motors in the past that are still superior to anything they make today (like the VH45DE V8).
Chevy's small block V8 is a very old core design and yet superior to almost anything else out there.
Age is not relevant. The PURPOSE and engineering that went into the motor is what matters.
Exactly what I was thinking. That thing would understeer like a mother.Red Devil wrote:
It'd screw up weight distribution though. All that extra mass is going to throw it off and affect handling.
...........hey............i'm pretty sure cars are designed around engines not like the old days when you could put a 426 hemi in a dodge dart w/o much trouble.....i'm pretty sure you have to let the mr18de do it's thing. someone might know all this here..........i don't even think you can put a qg engine under that hood................it's a french design that nissan tweaked and that's all there is to it............ADOversa wrote:Exactly what I was thinking. That thing would understeer like a mother.
It's a jointly designed engine, not a single design that was tweaked for Nissan.grogman wrote:
...........hey............i'm pretty sure cars are designed around engines not like the old days when you could put a 426 hemi in a dodge dart w/o much trouble.....i'm pretty sure you have to let the mr18de do it's thing. someone might know all this here..........i don't even think you can put a qg engine under that hood................it's a french design that nissan tweaked and that's all there is to it............
Oh. Yeah. Ok.Red Devil wrote:
I'm talking about age of the motor, not design.
Exactly. Think of Nissan and Renault as the same entity.Red Devil wrote:It's a jointly designed engine, not a single design that was tweaked for Nissan.
...........the only hope for the v in the performance segment is the turbo and that would be awesome for some of us. i just want to make my v look cool not some overblown project where the plastic skirting is dragging down the street someday......Red Devil wrote:
It's a jointly designed engine, not a single design that was tweaked for Nissan.
It depends on the compression ratio of the engine. Anything 11:1 and over isn't very agreeable with forced induction. Ideally you want something in the 9:1 range.sKyWaLkeR512 wrote:I entirely agree with the turbo. I think even a small setup with a side-mount intercooler (similar to stock K's Silvia) pushing 8 lbs would give our lovely little light-weight cars enough oomph to make someone notice.
You're most likely going to want to upgrade the MR's rods and pistons anyway, so that's not too big an issue.Red Devil wrote:
It depends on the compression ratio of the engine. Anything 11:1 and over isn't very agreeable with forced induction. Ideally you want something in the 9:1 range.
Hehe I was just talking with some friends about that. Sadly I don't have the money .sKyWaLkeR512 wrote:I entirely agree with the turbo. I think even a small setup with a side-mount intercooler (similar to stock K's Silvia) pushing 8 lbs would give our lovely little light-weight cars enough oomph to make someone notice.
Go you think there is the same room in a B15 as a Versa though? REALLY doubt it.lovesaga wrote:
Hehe I was just talking with some friends about that. Sadly I don't have the money .
Oh yea BTY a VQ 3.5 could be put in a versa. They do it in Sentras.