More Toyota problems, this time with the Corolla and steering

A General Discussion forum for cars and other topics, and a great place to introduce yourself if you are new to NICO!
User avatar
Bubba1
Moderator
Posts: 16082
Joined: Wed Oct 30, 2002 1:42 pm
Car: 2003 Nissan 350z
2024 Honda HR-V
2008 Toyota Corolla S
2001 Toyota Avalon XLS

Post

AZhitman wrote:And, on a side note, this is the PERFECT opportunity for Nissan do SOMETHING, ANYTHING, remarkable...

Sadly, there's nothing interesting slated for introduction any time in the next few months, and that's too bad.
I agree. Also, with Nissan investing so much into equipping so many of their new US cars with CVT's, I'm worried something will go sproing with them.



User avatar
hachiroku781
Posts: 1400
Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2006 5:05 am
Car: 1997 Nissan Maxima GXE

Post

Sadly this happened to me in my toyota. I got a flat then bam, Unexpected veering into the next lane. I think toyota should recall Mr2's from 1986 because when they get flat tires they decide to change lanes.

User avatar
AZhitman
Administrator
Posts: 54542
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2002 2:04 am
Car: 58 L210, 63 Bluebird RHD, 64 NL320, 65 SPL310, 66 411 RHD, 67 WRL411, 68 510 SR20, 75 280Z RB25, 77 620 SR20, 79 B310, 90 Z32, 91 GTi-R, 92 Silvia Qs, 98 S14, 23 Z.
Location: Surprise, Arizona
Contact:

Post

Red coupe wrote:Do you know how fast a modern processor can perform this operation? Almost instantly. It can be done in an imperceptible amount of time.
Cool it, Beavis - I ain't arguing with you.

I don't disagree with ANY of the engineering discussion here, and there's no question that electronics are FAR more efficient, lighter, cheaper and easily maintained than a hydraulically-assisted system.

My point was, they suck from a driver standpoint at this point in time. I drive 7-9 different vehicles on a monthly basis, and each has a different feel - The only one I have with EPS is the only one that really feels "disconnected".

I have no doubts they'll make great progress on the feedback (IF consumers demand it... they won't). But by then, I anticipate our worst fears will be realized: No physical connection between your hands and the front tires. Throttle linkages went away a long time ago - No one said a word.
Red coupe wrote: smaller & cheap cars to have power steering problems in auto crosses
Certainly not limited to small or cheap or autocross - My G35, despite a SECOND added PS cooler, boils the fluid at every track day, even on some not-so-technical road courses... The S13 did it at the last drift event (which hampered it more than the G, given the tight layout and 255mm front tires)...

User avatar
Eikon
Posts: 6928
Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2004 3:20 am
Car: 71 240z, 93 Supra TT
Location: Lake Orion, MI
Contact:

Post

I bought (well - leased actually) and 09 Corolla for my wife to use as a daily. We're 20 months into the lease and she's got 20k miles on it.

Here's my opinion on the car and Toyota as a whole:

We have a J car... It was built in Japan so the VIN starts with a J. So, no recall on the accelerator pedal. However, I'm not a huge fan of the drive by wire or electronic throttle system. My beef with it is that it seems twitchy... With a regular cable throttle, you have total control, you can ease into the throttle very smoothly. It seems like the electronic throttle control goes from 0% to 5% with no in between.. it sort of jerks a tad every time you touch it. Not a huge deal, but annoying if you are driving long distances without using cruise.

My biggest issue with the car.. THE ABS SUCKS!!!! I seriously wonder if mine is defective. Any sign of slippage and it completely shuts off your brakes it seems.. I bet I could lock up the tires and stop much shorter than when the ABS engages... drives me nuts! It's just way too strong. I swear it's the ABS that is going to cause an accident because it won't allow the car to stop. GRRRR

Other than that.. great car!

I think Toyota is getting a bum rap. I think they have a higher standard of quality than most, and many of the recent recalls have been ones that other car manufacturers wouldn't have even done because they don't have as high standards. Now, clearly the safety issues with the accelerators and brakes need to be dealt with, but some of the other things didn't deserve as much attention.


User avatar
s0m3th1ngAZ
Posts: 3856
Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2005 10:11 am
Car: 96' Miata
2014 Focus ST

Post

Yeah...as I was saying with the E-Throttle...problems in electronic steering today are mainly a software problem. The engineering is sound but manufacturers refuse to program a "twitchy" steering system into their cars. They would much rather go the conservative route.

User avatar
Red coupe
Posts: 12216
Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2004 6:51 pm
Car: 92 Nissan 240sx Coupe

Post

AZhitman wrote:
Cool it, Beavis - I ain't arguing with you.
And I am not arguing with you.

You said:Quote »I don't think the electric would keep up better - I think it'd lag more (just a guess, I'm no engineer).

Sensors have to "interpret" the torque applied to the steering shaft (from each end - road and wheel) and decide, based on a predetermined algorithm, how much additional torque to apply.[/quote]I was just pointing out that a modern processor could do that NO PROBLEM. No reason for there to be any kind of noticeable lag there.
AZhitman wrote:My point was, they suck from a driver standpoint at this point in time. I drive 7-9 different vehicles on a monthly basis, and each has a different feel - The only one I have with EPS is the only one that really feels "disconnected".
My point was it only sucks because the manufacturer decided to make it that way. You can hardly count only one car as being THE example of how it is used. Like I said, the MR2 had electronically assisted power steering, so did the NSX (or a manual rack)Would driving both of those cars, then driving a 98 camry justify saying "hydraulic systems cause a disconnected feeling because the other electric assist cars I have driven didn't feel like that" make sense?

The Cube is... a Nissan cube. Its a modern economy vehicle meant for toting passengers around. Is isn't that hard to believe that Nissan just put a crappy steering system in there. For some reason it seems to be what the average, non enthusiast buyer wants.

There are tons of hydraulic systems designed to have that numb feel...yours is just an example of the same result being designed with a different system.

User avatar
AZhitman
Administrator
Posts: 54542
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2002 2:04 am
Car: 58 L210, 63 Bluebird RHD, 64 NL320, 65 SPL310, 66 411 RHD, 67 WRL411, 68 510 SR20, 75 280Z RB25, 77 620 SR20, 79 B310, 90 Z32, 91 GTi-R, 92 Silvia Qs, 98 S14, 23 Z.
Location: Surprise, Arizona
Contact:

Post

Makes sense - I'm certain the electronics will have caught up (IF buyers demand that "feel" - they won't) before too long.

User avatar
Red coupe
Posts: 12216
Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2004 6:51 pm
Car: 92 Nissan 240sx Coupe

Post

AZhitman wrote:Makes sense - I'm certain the electronics will have caught up (IF buyers demand that "feel" - they won't) before too long.
lol, they don't need to catch up.

Like I said, systems that worked well were used in the MR2 and the NSX... and that is just two I can pull off the top of my head.

It's just that random consumers don't care, and if anything dislike it. Part of why Toyota's are so disconnected"Oh my, this car feels like its driving its self!"Its done a lot on newer cars, and most of it is determined by the strength of that torsion rod, not even the hydraulic/electric system because that rod will absorb so many minor fluctuations with out transmitting them.

User avatar
AZhitman
Administrator
Posts: 54542
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2002 2:04 am
Car: 58 L210, 63 Bluebird RHD, 64 NL320, 65 SPL310, 66 411 RHD, 67 WRL411, 68 510 SR20, 75 280Z RB25, 77 620 SR20, 79 B310, 90 Z32, 91 GTi-R, 92 Silvia Qs, 98 S14, 23 Z.
Location: Surprise, Arizona
Contact:

Post

Interesting article....

http://autoelectronics.com/cha...g_eps/

I lol'ed at the last sentence.

User avatar
audtatious
Moderator
Posts: 25014
Joined: Sun Oct 27, 2002 5:31 pm
Car: 2017 Q60 Red Sport. Gone: 2014 Q50s, 2008 G37s coupe, 2007 G35s Sedan, 2002 Maxima SE, 2000 Villager Estate (Quest), 1998 Quest, 1996 Sentra GXE
Location: Stalking You
Contact:

Post


User avatar
AZhitman
Administrator
Posts: 54542
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2002 2:04 am
Car: 58 L210, 63 Bluebird RHD, 64 NL320, 65 SPL310, 66 411 RHD, 67 WRL411, 68 510 SR20, 75 280Z RB25, 77 620 SR20, 79 B310, 90 Z32, 91 GTi-R, 92 Silvia Qs, 98 S14, 23 Z.
Location: Surprise, Arizona
Contact:

Post


User avatar
troskinatior
Posts: 1228
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 1:26 pm
Car: A Two Tone Piggy Coupe
Location: Jersey Shore Bish

Post

I really don't care about any of this, I just hope they don't cancel the ft-86 because of this.

User avatar
bmike818
Posts: 2926
Joined: Tue Feb 13, 2007 4:56 pm
Car: 2007 Z

Post

maybe with all this problems with Toyotas, Lotus would use a K20 in their Elise instead of a toyota engine....maybe even a VQ?

User avatar
Razi
Posts: 28373
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2006 9:52 am
Car: Moo

Post

Nope, JDM tyte SR20 swap son!

User avatar
Ace2cool
Posts: 11650
Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2008 5:21 pm
Car: 1991 Nissan 300ZX TT
1966 Datsun Fairlady 1600
2005 Suzuki GSX-R 600
1974 Honda CB550 Four
2009 Ford F150 Lariat
Location: Murfreesboro, TN

Post

I didn't even know Toyota made lawnmowers.

User avatar
szh
Posts: 15932
Joined: Tue Jul 23, 2002 12:54 pm
Car: 2018 Tesla Model 3.

Unfortunately, no longer a Nissan or Infiniti, but continuing here at NICO!
Location: San Jose, CA

Post


User avatar
audtatious
Moderator
Posts: 25014
Joined: Sun Oct 27, 2002 5:31 pm
Car: 2017 Q60 Red Sport. Gone: 2014 Q50s, 2008 G37s coupe, 2007 G35s Sedan, 2002 Maxima SE, 2000 Villager Estate (Quest), 1998 Quest, 1996 Sentra GXE
Location: Stalking You
Contact:

Post

Ace2cool wrote:I didn't even know Toyota made lawnmowers.
I believe that was a joke...


User avatar
nissangirl74
Moderator
Posts: 13910
Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2009 1:15 pm
Car: 2014 Xterra Pro4X, '12 Titan 4x4, '98 240sx, '89 Pao, '77 620, '72 240Z w/RB25, '68 510, '67 WRL411, '67.5 SPL 311, '63 Bluebird, '63 NL320

Post

It just keeps coming.... now there's a recall on the Tundra

http://www.thecarconnection.co...Blogs)
Red coupe wrote: People just seem to be searching for stuff to pin on toyota now.
It's really starting to get ridiculous. How can one company really go from being the best in the world to one of the worst almost overnight?

User avatar
Jesda
Posts: 39644
Joined: Mon May 05, 2003 1:50 pm
Location: STL, DTW
Contact:

Post

Its like shaking up a bottle. Eventually, the cap bursts and coca cola is everywhere.

User avatar
Red coupe
Posts: 12216
Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2004 6:51 pm
Car: 92 Nissan 240sx Coupe

Post

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v...edded

A good video with some important information regarding the toyota recalls....

User avatar
MinisterofDOOM
Moderator
Posts: 30928
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:51 pm
Car: 1962 Corvair Monza
1961 Corvair Lakewood
1974 Unimog 404
1997 Pathfinder XE
2005 Lincoln LS8
Former:
1995 Q45t
1993 Maxima GXE
1995 Ranger XL 2.3
1984 Coupe DeVille
Location: The middle of nowhere.

Post

nissangirl74 wrote:It's really starting to get ridiculous. How can one company really go from being the best in the world to one of the worst almost overnight?
They didn't! It's like I've been saying for years: Toyota has not been the "best" for a decade. People are just too stupid to think for themselves rather than believe advertisements. Toyota's quality did not decline over night. It has been on the decline for the last 8-10 years. They started trading quality for volume and it has finally caught up with them. Up until now, they've been living on their reputation from yesteryear, from the 90s. That has worked because there hasn't been anything significant in the public eye to disagree with the ads claims that they're still the best. It was really only a matter of time until this happened. They have only themselves to blame. They got greedy and traded quality for volume, counting on their excellent reputation to keep them afloat. Well now they have neither quality nor reputation and their sales volume is probably going to take a nice hit to boot. They made a stupid gamble and lost. It makes me laugh.



The scary part is Nissan is on the SAME path. Volume over quality and the CVT obsession are NOT going to be good for Nissan's future. I've been saying THAT for a while, too. It's a good thing Nissan doesn't make anything I'd buy anymore or I'd have to be concerned for their future. As they stand now, I'm prepared to point and laugh just as I'm doing for Toyota.

User avatar
Jesda
Posts: 39644
Joined: Mon May 05, 2003 1:50 pm
Location: STL, DTW
Contact:

Post

MinisterofDOOM wrote:It's a good thing Nissan doesn't make anything I'd buy anymore or I'd have to be concerned for their future.
370Z!!!!!! The exception to every Nissan.

User avatar
Ace2cool
Posts: 11650
Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2008 5:21 pm
Car: 1991 Nissan 300ZX TT
1966 Datsun Fairlady 1600
2005 Suzuki GSX-R 600
1974 Honda CB550 Four
2009 Ford F150 Lariat
Location: Murfreesboro, TN

Post

Jesda wrote:
370Z!!!!!! The exception to every Nissan.
Yes. This is truth.

User avatar
dasoupdude
Posts: 4803
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 2:26 pm
Car: 2005 Nissan 350Z
Location: Palm Beach, FL / Sacramento, CA
Contact:

Post

See the thing is, toyota's slogan is "moving forward," they never really said anything about stoppjng.


User avatar
MinisterofDOOM
Moderator
Posts: 30928
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:51 pm
Car: 1962 Corvair Monza
1961 Corvair Lakewood
1974 Unimog 404
1997 Pathfinder XE
2005 Lincoln LS8
Former:
1995 Q45t
1993 Maxima GXE
1995 Ranger XL 2.3
1984 Coupe DeVille
Location: The middle of nowhere.

Post

Jesda wrote:
370Z!!!!!! The exception to every Nissan.
I went to pick up my parents' Maxima from the dealer (had some HVAC maintenance done) and there was a 370z convertible in the showroom. Spectacular. I hated the Z32 and Z33 convertibles, but the Z34 looks great topless. Nissan did a great job with the tonneau cover and the haunches.

wa-chiss
Posts: 2569
Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2006 10:23 pm
Car: 1990 Nissan S13 H/C KA24E
2005 Toyota Sequoia
1976 Honda CB750F Super Sport
Location: San Angelo, TX

Post

Dasoupdude wrote:See the thing is, toyota's slogan is "moving forward," they never really said anything about stoppjng.
"Moving Forward, even when you don't want to"

User avatar
AZhitman
Administrator
Posts: 54542
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2002 2:04 am
Car: 58 L210, 63 Bluebird RHD, 64 NL320, 65 SPL310, 66 411 RHD, 67 WRL411, 68 510 SR20, 75 280Z RB25, 77 620 SR20, 79 B310, 90 Z32, 91 GTi-R, 92 Silvia Qs, 98 S14, 23 Z.
Location: Surprise, Arizona
Contact:

Post

Red coupe wrote:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v...edded

A good video with some important information regarding the toyota recalls....

User avatar
MinisterofDOOM
Moderator
Posts: 30928
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:51 pm
Car: 1962 Corvair Monza
1961 Corvair Lakewood
1974 Unimog 404
1997 Pathfinder XE
2005 Lincoln LS8
Former:
1995 Q45t
1993 Maxima GXE
1995 Ranger XL 2.3
1984 Coupe DeVille
Location: The middle of nowhere.

Post

I listened to the radio for the first time in a while today and heard a Toyota ad talking about how they value "my" trust (guffaw) and how they're working hard to keep that trust.

Quick tip, Toyota:If you value your customers' trust, it's probably best to admit your mistakes when called out the first time. And the second time. And the third time. And NOT blame your mistakes on your customers instead.

User avatar
flohtingPoint
Posts: 3564
Joined: Tue May 13, 2003 2:46 pm
Car: 2004 Z16 Corvette Z06
Location: Washington DC
Contact:

Post



Alot funnier if you remember/know of Ralf's days driving for Toyota F1. Less funny if the previous sentence had to explain it for you.


Return to “General Chat”