What we do with our money should be up to us, not anyone else. I will argue for Streisand/Obama to spend her/their money the way they want while arguing I have the same right. In that, I agree with the above. I also challenge the Dem party to put their money where their mouth is and fund their own pet projects with their money instead of mandating everyone pay for it collectively. Same goes to the GOP.srellim234 wrote:BTW, I also agree with you that redistribution the Moore way is ridiculous. Pointing fingers at how people are donating to their causes NOW is not a valid argument. If it were, I would have asked you how much of their personal fortunes George Bush, Barack Obama, John Boehner, Mitch McConnell, most of the staff at Fox, etc. donated to shore up Chase, BofA, GM, Chrysler,and so on. They sure didn't have a problem with redistributing OUR money to corporate America, did they?
In spite of your misguided logic there are some Americans that have done well and are using their wealth to give back to those less fortunate.AZhitman wrote:Howie will just claim he's exempt - he's not "wealthy" because he makes less than $250K a year. That's how the left passes the buck.
Wonder if Ted Danson and Barbara Streisand and Danny Glover and the rest of the brain-dead Hollywood twats have been handing out piles of money? After all, according to Moore, it's not theirs.
It's OK Howie - I'll stand up and fight for your savings and your retirement. And I won't ask for anything in return. After all, the morons you follow don't think it belongs to you. Doesn't that make you angry? Or are you just too star-struck by their fame?
Such an absurd phrasetelcoman wrote:give back
No, "misguided logic" is saying that what people earn doesn't belong to them. It's misguided to think that someone else can dictate what I do with my money.telcoman wrote:In spite of your misguided logic
Classism at its worst.telcoman wrote:many wealthy pigs
No, he is of the "owe a debt to society" group. In their mind if you get something for your hard work or thoughtful planning then you are effectively removing opportunity from someone else, thus, you must be mandated to give back to society.stebo0728 wrote:Such an absurd phrasetelcoman wrote:give back
Its give, not give back