MONSTER Hardbody!

Forum for the Xterra, Frontier and Hardbody, the smaller workhorses of the Nissan lineup!
User avatar
AZhitman
Administrator
Posts: 54538
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2002 2:04 am
Car: 58 L210, 63 Bluebird RHD, 64 NL320, 65 SPL310, 66 411 RHD, 67 WRL411, 68 510 SR20, 75 280Z RB25, 77 620 SR20, 79 B310, 90 Z32, 91 GTi-R, 92 Silvia Qs, 98 S14, 23 Z.
Location: Surprise, Arizona
Contact:

Post



User avatar
Desert Rat
Posts: 1642
Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 11:57 am
Car: 2014 370Z M6 Base Coupe
2017 Frontier 4.0
2007 Dodge Ram 2500 Cummins Quad Cab 4x4
1977 F150 4x4 Shorty BUILT
2008 Boulevard C90T
Previous owner of a bunch of Nissans
Location: Mesa, AZ
Contact:

Post

What a piece of JUNK!

OMG, that steering does NOT look safe. Bumpsteer must be murderous on that thing (I've got experience doing solid axle swaps on these things). Plus, those bends in the draglink just don't even look safe.

Also note there's no front driveshaft, and probably no ability to install one due to the extreme angle (if the thing even HAS a transfer case).

Crush it. That's all it's good for.

User avatar
Big-Bird
Posts: 684
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 4:41 pm
Car: 2000 Xterra on 'Roids & 2004 Quest SL

Post

Yikes! Just when you think you've seen it all, something like this shows up. It has some nice looks but Unless it was a 100% TRAIL USE ONLYi that truck would be completely illegal to have in Canada. And DR is right...it has no transfer case so it would be a permanenet 2WD or woud have to have a NP T-Case added to it. Or if you had some money you could put an Atlas T-case on it and clock the whole thing to reduce the front drive line angle.

IMHO - It would make a so-so trail beast.

Personnally it does nothing for me. If it had 35's and 4WD that would make it much more pragmatic.

Oh and for what it makes it illegal in Canada and several other places.

Headlights are way above maximum heights set by Transport Canada.Front Bumper is too high. and would be dangerous in the event of a collision.No mud flaps and no side skirts. ( Tires must be covered by a fender or fender flare to reduce slinging airborne debris and for the safety of other vehciles around you.)The massive lift blocks are not illegal but they are also not safe. The proper way to gain lift is with the correct leaf pack, proper length shackles, and taller leaf spring frame mounts that reduce the need for spacer blocks in between the axle and the leafs.

Tall spacer blocks just cause axle wrap and wheel hop which are dangerous by themselves.


User avatar
AZhitman
Administrator
Posts: 54538
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2002 2:04 am
Car: 58 L210, 63 Bluebird RHD, 64 NL320, 65 SPL310, 66 411 RHD, 67 WRL411, 68 510 SR20, 75 280Z RB25, 77 620 SR20, 79 B310, 90 Z32, 91 GTi-R, 92 Silvia Qs, 98 S14, 23 Z.
Location: Surprise, Arizona
Contact:

Post

Ummmm, it's obvious that it's a show truck, guys. I just had never seen a Nissan that extreme.

Personally, for off-roading (which I am VERY much the novice at), I prefer a small, light, low-geared vehicle with lots of wheel travel and smallish tires...

Last time I was in Yuma at the dunes, the Suzuki Samurai I was riding in was making mincemeat of the "lifted trucks"...

Fun to watch all the purpose-built trucks getting bogged down while this little 60-hp Samurai with the weird gear reduction box plugged right on up the dunes.

User avatar
Desert Rat
Posts: 1642
Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 11:57 am
Car: 2014 370Z M6 Base Coupe
2017 Frontier 4.0
2007 Dodge Ram 2500 Cummins Quad Cab 4x4
1977 F150 4x4 Shorty BUILT
2008 Boulevard C90T
Previous owner of a bunch of Nissans
Location: Mesa, AZ
Contact:

Post

AZhitman wrote:Ummmm, it's obvious that it's a show truck, guys. I just had never seen a Nissan that extreme.

Personally, for off-roading (which I am VERY much the novice at), I prefer a small, light, low-geared vehicle with lots of wheel travel and smallish tires...
Spot on.


User avatar
Dano
Posts: 11535
Joined: Tue Oct 29, 2002 8:01 pm
Car: '05 Nissan Frontier Nismo CC
'95 Nissan 240SX base
Location: Kansas City, KS/ Phx, AZ
Contact:

Post

ROFL at that truck, but it is kind of neat to see someone take it so far. Definately not my thing but still neat to see once.

-Dan

chemao
Posts: 369
Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2006 7:32 pm
Car: 2019 Tesla Model 3 - preordered
1997V2 AM General H1 with 6.6L Duramax (LML) running biodiesel swap
2015 Lexus CT200H
2003 Hummer H2 with 6.5L Detroit Turbodiesel swap
Location: Boston, MA

Post

That's bad ***.

kellyb420
Posts: 4
Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2007 5:21 am
Car: D 21 pickup

Post

it would be a good parts truck but i wouldnt drive it ten feet. beleive me ive drove some big trucks before but they were right this one would need to be hualed to a show but not the woods or trail too top heavy

White_Shadow
Posts: 11
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2007 9:36 am

Post

thats a bit extreme

broknindarkagain
Posts: 5
Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2007 11:14 pm
Car: 1990 Nissan D21& 1993 Subaru Legacy
Contact:

Post

AZhitman wrote:Ummmm, it's obvious that it's a show truck, guys. I just had never seen a Nissan that extreme.

Personally, for off-roading (which I am VERY much the novice at), I prefer a small, light, low-geared vehicle with lots of wheel travel and smallish tires...

Last time I was in Yuma at the dunes, the Suzuki Samurai I was riding in was making mincemeat of the "lifted trucks"...

Fun to watch all the purpose-built trucks getting bogged down while this little 60-hp Samurai with the weird gear reduction box plugged right on up the dunes.
I'm with you on the smaller offroad vehicles. I use to go up to Sycamore Creek and Bucher Jones (NW of Mesa) a lot....We never once had a lifted truck and could get through anything. I would take my VW bug out there too and it made it through most things....

I havn't got a chance to go down to the dunes yet though. That would be fun

Florida240sx
Posts: 11114
Joined: Thu Jul 01, 2004 7:17 am
Car: 1993 Nissan 240SX Hatch 5spd
2012 Nissan Altima S coupe 2.5
Location: DeLand FL

Post

How have I never seen it?


Return to “Nissan Trucks Forum”