CoupeVQ35CVT wrote:Speaking of gaining HP..
Why is it that it seems whenever someone removes their car's (usually stock ) muffler(s) they lose bottom end? Most will come back with "you lose backpressure" BS which I know is false.
Is it because the stock muffler is designed to help with the exhaust escape velocity.. even that far down the piping? I don't understand how that would still have any affect... But yet I've seen several threads about this.. going straight pipe and you lose bottom end. I think a poster by the name of Hussain said the same thing, going straight pipe caused him to notice a lack of low end.... Maybe you can enlighten us?
Exhaust Theory 101 from Professor Throckmorton
Your exhaust system is designed to evacuate gases from the combustion chamber quickly and efficiently. Exhaust gases are not produced in a smooth stream; exhaust gases originate in pulses. A 4 cylinder engine will have 4 distinct pulses per complete engine cycle, a 6 cylinder has 6 pulses and so on. The more pulses that are produced, the more continuous the exhaust flow. Backpressure can be loosely defined as the resistance to positive flow - in this case, the resistance to positive flow of the exhaust stream.
Backpressure and velocity
Some people operate under the misguided notion that wider pipes are more effective at clearing the combustion chamber than narrower pipes. It's not hard to see how this misconception is appealing - wider pipes have the capability to flow more than narrower pipes. So if they have the ability to flow more, why isn't "wider is better" a good rule of thumb for exhaust upgrading? In a word - VELOCITY. I'm sure that all of you have at one time used a garden hose w/o a spray nozzle on it. If you let the water just run unrestricted out of the house it flows at a rather slow rate. However, if you take your finger and cover part of the opening, the water will flow out at a much much faster rate. Strange but true!
The astute exhaust designer knows that you must balance flow capacity with velocity. You want the exhaust gases to exit the chamber and speed along at the highest velocity possible - you want a FAST exhaust stream. If you have two exhaust pulses of equal volume, one in a 2" pipe and one in a 3" pipe, the pulse in the 2" pipe will be traveling considerably FASTER than the pulse in the 3" pipe. While it is true that the narrower the pipe, the higher the velocity of the exiting gases, you want make sure the pipe is wide enough so that there is as little backpressure as possible while maintaining suitable exhaust velocity. Backpressure in it's most extreme form can lead to reversion of the exhaust stream - that is to say the exhaust flows backwards, which is not good. The trick is to have a pipe that that is as narrow as possible while having as close to zero backpressure as possible at the RPM range you want your power band to be located at. Exhaust pipe diameters are best suited to a particular RPM range. A smaller pipe diameter will produce higher exhaust velocities at a lower RPM but create unacceptably high amounts of backpressure at high rpm. Thus if your power band is located 2-3000 RPM you'd want a narrower pipe than if your power band is located at 8-9000RPM.
So how did this myth come to be?
I believe it is a misunderstanding of what is going on with the exhaust stream as pipe diameters change. For instance, someone with a low horsepower, small displacement daily driver decides he's going to upgrade his exhaust with a 3" diameter piping. Once it's installed the owner notices that he seems to have lost a good bit of power throughout the power band. He makes the connections in the following manner: "My wider exhaust eliminated all backpressure but I lost power, therefore the motor must need some backpressure in order to make power." What he did not realize is that he killed off all his flow velocity by using such a ridiculously wide pipe. It would have been possible for him to achieve close to zero backpressure with a much narrower pipe - in that way he would not have lost all his flow velocity.
It has been proven that most people equate noise = power. A loud car is a faster car in some peoples mind. You can read time after time on these forums that some people want a car that is loud, and will pay good money to modify their car to get that sound. They really don't know if their modification to the exhaust made their car faster, but to them it not only sounds better [louder], but they read on a forum that their car now makes 10 or more horse power. They are happy!
This I call the Placebo Effect:
An improvement in a vehicles performance regarded as the effect of the person's belief in the effectiveness of the modification performed.
I think that makes it easier to understand. Next week we will discuss Einstein's Theory of Relativity, E=mc2 Just kidding. It's that sarcasm thing rearing it's ugly head again.
I have to leave now, as I must get ready for my date this evening with Megan Fox. She wants to tell me the real reason she does not want to be a Bond Girl in the next 007 movie.
Now thats not likely to happen, is it?
Neither is free, cheap horse power gains.
Be Safe.