It was never crazy in the first place, but in engineering terms there needs to be a balance between lubrication and performance of the IVT hydraulics. For both Nissan and MB, it would have been smart to make the IVT response map in the ECM software "weight selectable" so the system could cope with thicker lubes just like coping with E85. But nooooooooo......
Thanks for piping in.3Q Jay wrote: ↑Wed Dec 29, 2021 7:10 pmIt's always a balance of real world vs. paper spec. 15000 km OCIs are absurd even though some do it.
Fuel dilution seems to be key here, and indeed some engines are going to be more susceptible than others.
I have UOAs at every change on both of my VH45DEs, going back 14 and 16 years.
My current blend is 5qt M1 0w-30 AFE, and 1qt M1 0w-40 Euro. This has proven quite satisfactory for my needs over the last 10 years. I'm very fond of 0w-for the quicker flow on cold start.
I have at times gone more than 24 months between OCIs, but that is also because the cars see less than 1k a year now. Longest OCI for me was 7068 miles, which included a CA to FL summer trip and 90 minutes daily drive in FL heat for 6 mos--so any moisture was of course properly boiled out.
And to think, in much of Europe they're taxicabs (not the AMG GT specifically, but you get what I mean). Tch-tch.PalmerWMD wrote: ↑Thu Dec 30, 2021 1:44 pmI keep watching that german channel and I am amazed how many forced induction $120,000 Mercedes AMG need new engines at 80,000 , 60,000 even 30,000 miles.
Our Infinitis even the factory tubored ones, are like like Honda Civics compared to those in reliability and ease and cost of repair.
And the repair costs for even medium repairs are like $20,000 (no, thats not a complete engine, just heads from jumped timing)
Cats breaking and back pressuring into the motor at 8000 miles etc etc
Ona Nissan V8 it takes at least 120,000 miles of neglect to get to that point, if ever.
Complete engine replacement is $60,000 and thats just in parts.
Thank you, sir! (IIRC you are/were an FGO)
They're also trying to balance engine longevity against fuel economy (i.e., meet CAFE requirements).VStar650CL wrote: ↑Tue Dec 28, 2021 5:11 amIt was never crazy in the first place, but in engineering terms there needs to be a balance between lubrication and performance of the IVT hydraulics.
Yah, but for the driver, good fuel economy is optional. Having IVT's and chain tensioners that work right and cylinders that don't burn oil is mandatory. Not that our wonderful, CAFE-enamoured government could give a crap about that.
I was not trying to throw shade on Mbil1 0w-40.BCC93QT wrote: ↑Mon Jan 03, 2022 8:58 amI'm no expert on motor oil by all means. Have owned 6 G50 Q45s. Currently #4 5 and 6 are still in the stables. Have only ever run mobil 1 0w-40 at roughly 8-10k mile intervals on every single one I have ever owned. Including #2 which made it to 396k miles. Of that 396 there was significant hard rough redline driving with the nico ecu. Have clocked well over 500k miles in G50 ownership. Won't run anything else for oil
Hmmm, interesting but I ca now see the actual word you wrote
Everything revolves around environmentalism in Europe - and used motor oil is a "particular concern".
The way viscosity works, the first number represents "won't get thinner than this when hot", the second represents "won't get thicker than this when cold". Using 0W40 in a cold climate is likely to get you codes for the IVT/EVT system on a cold day when the oil doesn't thin out completely before the coolant gets hot. It's probably fine in summer or in a warm climate, but that will depend on your particular ECM and under which conditions it unlocks the IVT's. I think the only way to know for sure would be to try it.