This sums it up.danshaz82 wrote:i liked how the effects were more realistic. like the blood splatter and the blood dripping from the one guys mouth. and i liked how the zombies actually acted like zombies.
LOL. I could do that with my neighbors in their front yards watching with no prior warning and no one would care. They'd all assume it was nothing bad. But I live in a very good neighborhood.numbnuts240 wrote:plus idk about where you live, but if i were to walk down the street with a baseball bat, wearing blood stained clothes and "beat down" some dude in front of a house, i'd be in cuffs in no time.
Do you have any idea how much it costs to shoot on actual celluloid film?danshaz82 wrote:did you guys shoot on film or digital? looks like digital to me.
Damn straight yo!numbnuts240 wrote:about tree fiddy.
yes, i do. my friend is a film major and all he shoots on is film.Empty V wrote:
Do you have any idea how much it costs to shoot on actual celluloid film?
No you don't otherwise you wouldn't have asked if it was shot on film.danshaz82 wrote:yes, i do. my friend is a film major and all he shoots on is film.
well my friend shoots with kodak vision 3. idk how much he gets if for, but its not that expensive.Empty V wrote:
No you don't otherwise you wouldn't have asked if it was shot on film.
He's probably shooting 5207, a 16mm gauge stock which isn't that expensive. Processing, telecine, and tape transfers, all which have to be done in order to edit on a non-linear editing system, add up in $$ very quickly. Plus 16mm film doesn't have an audio track so that's got to be recorded separately. It's not like you just shoot the film and voila it's on your comp, it's a very lengthy and expensive process.danshaz82 wrote:well my friend shoots with kodak vision 3. idk how much he gets if for, but its not that expensive.
oh i know. we shoot and have to record separately. and once we finish shooting, my friend sends out all the film to a place in new york called color lab. but since he knows the manager, he gets all his film processed for like a fourth of the price. so really, i guess i dont really know how expensive it actually is.Empty V wrote:
He's probably shooting 5207, a 16mm gauge stock which isn't that expensive. Processing, telecine, and tape transfers, all which have to be done in order to edit on a non-linear editing system, add up in $$ very quickly. Plus 16mm film doesn't have an audio track so that's got to be recorded separately. It's not like you just shoot the film and voila it's on your comp, it's a very lengthy and expensive process.