And I think there are just as many "good leaders" who DON'T have the "gift of gab". The ones you mention are / were in positions of needing to be good orators to convey their thoughts and vision... Here's an example of what I mean, and it's totally off-the-cuff...Encryptshun wrote:
Hmm. I guess I'd have to disagree with you there. I think that the President, as the CEO and leader of our nation, should ABSOLUTELY be a speaker who can persuade, empassion, and re-patriotize us. Especially in times of crisis and economic downturn.
And when has eloquence or the ability to motivate people NOT ranked high in the characteristics of a good leader? (Of course I might not understand your exact definition of "good" leader.) Let's see (in no particular order): Lincoln, FDR, Kennedy, Reagan, Chavez, Stalin, Lenin, Hitler, Peron, Ghandi (Indjeera), Mandella. All were considered great leaders by their respective countrymen in their respective times, and all are also known for their great oratory.
Ever see Saving Private Ryan? Hanks' character. Brilliant leader, but certainly no great speaker. Vince Lombardi? Aside frmo a few sound bites, not a great speaker, but widely regarded (even outside the sports world) as a great leader.
Leadership transcends venue, whether it be presidential, corporate, parental, battlefield, sports.
What if we had a candidate with a speech impediment? A deaf candidate? Or, taken to an extreme, a guy like Stephen Hawking?
There may be phenomenal leadership in there, but to expect him to go to the podium and make people swoon is simply not realistic.
Side note: I think much of this is a function of the times... notice most popular singers now are not unattractive? People want the whole package. You may have a fantastic voice, but if you look like Rocky Dennis, no recording deal for you. You think Joe Cocker or Janis Joplin would have made it in today's market?
