HashiriyaS14 wrote:The only differences between the current parties and the third parties worthy of consideration are differences in policy, and only executable policy need be considered.
The solution is to drive the existing parties to the center and keep the extremists on either side from wielding too much influence.
Genius.
The current situation lends itself well to checks and balances.
I don't want Ol' Socialist Obama running things without a GOP Congress to keep a leash on his pie-in-the-sky phony idealism, and I don't want GWB pummelling the Left with evangelical restrictions and picking fights with countries better left to their own devices...
The reason a third party isn't in the cards right now? There's no REAL center. Division exists across the board, and even registered Independents (such as myself) lean FAR right on some issues and FAR left on others.
Since Steve pointed out that we didn't start out with the 2 current parties, I'd like to point out a little history - that this was NOT a "top-down" change.
Don't be misled, the changes occurred at the grassroots level, and if you're serious about supporting the advent of a third party in the US, that's where you'll throw your support. It WILL work its way upstream... But not by November.
Voting for Nader did NOT influence GWB's policies. So, NO, voting for a third party in November does NOT accomplish driving the existing ones towards the center.
