McCain, Obama failed to qualify for Texas ballot

A place for intelligent and well-thought-out discussion involving politics and associated topics. No nonsense will be tolerated at all.
User avatar
srellim234
Posts: 2710
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2007 8:12 am
Car: 2007 Nissan Versa SL hatch w/CVT
(sold 08/2011)
2008 Toyota Prius
(purchased 04/2016)
Location: Laughlin, NV

Post

I know it's getting no coverage in the press because it's a third party candidate blowing the whistle, but check out this press release from Bob Barr's Libertarian Party campaign:

http://www.bobbarr2008.com/pre...allot/

If Texas is such a "we enforce the law" state, let's see if they have the cajones to enforce this one. Both the Republicans AND the Democrats failed to submit their candidates by the deadline to qualify for the ballot in Texas.


User avatar
Jesda
Posts: 39644
Joined: Mon May 05, 2003 1:50 pm
Location: STL, DTW
Contact:

Post

THAT is hilarious. McBama are so busy digging up scandals and throwing mud that they forgot to put themselves on the ballot.

User avatar
HashiriyaS14
Posts: 14298
Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2003 8:02 pm
Car: '95 Nissan 240SX
'08 Honda Accord
'08 Honda NPS50
'03 Kawasaki Ninja 250
'60 Honda Super Cub
Location: DC Metro Area
Contact:

Post

Very interesting!

Somehow, I see them being allowed on the ballot, but I admit that it at least appears to be a legitimate goof on both of their parts.

If, theoretically, they were both excluded, it would be a tremendous game changer. McCain would lose the 34 electoral votes granted by Texas that he was sure to win. Without these votes, he would absolutely lose in November, no question.

Obviously, I kind of hope they enforce this, as it appears to be legitimate and it would almost certainly make Barack Obama the next President of the United States.

Of course, if they just remove those electoral votes entirely and drop the total to 504, then they could just run the election based on someone needing a majority of 252 to win. This is questionable though, as obviously Barr filed on time, and then he would get screwed.

This has potentially very serious implications, but I'm still betting that they will be allowed on and nothing will come of it.

User avatar
wingFeather
Posts: 1819
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 10:08 am
Car: Current: 05 G35 Coupe
Previous: M35, M35 Sport, cube, J30, s13 sr20det, s13 rb20det, s14 zenki

Post

Did this Barr guy comply? And why is he still running? I honestly want to know.

User avatar
HashiriyaS14
Posts: 14298
Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2003 8:02 pm
Car: '95 Nissan 240SX
'08 Honda Accord
'08 Honda NPS50
'03 Kawasaki Ninja 250
'60 Honda Super Cub
Location: DC Metro Area
Contact:

Post

wingFeather wrote:Did this Barr guy comply? And why is he still running? I honestly want to know.
A.) Yes, it appears that "This Barr guy" registered in time, or at least that's what is implied.

B.) He is running as a Libertarian, i.e. a third party. There will be a number of Third Party candidates running in November, including:

Bob Barr (Libertarian)Ralph Nader (Independent)Charles Jay (Boston Tea Party - basically like Libertarian)Chuck Baldwin (Constitution Party)Cynthia McKinney (Green Party)Brian Moore (Socialist Party)

I hope Ron Paul runs as an Independent, but we're probably past all the relevant deadlines.

User avatar
wingFeather
Posts: 1819
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 10:08 am
Car: Current: 05 G35 Coupe
Previous: M35, M35 Sport, cube, J30, s13 sr20det, s13 rb20det, s14 zenki

Post

HashiriyaS14 wrote:There will be a number of Third Party candidates running in November
Don't they look at the track record of 3rd party winners, the primary vote count (as unscientific as that is), etc... ? To me, it looks like they have better odds winning the lotto.

User avatar
HashiriyaS14
Posts: 14298
Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2003 8:02 pm
Car: '95 Nissan 240SX
'08 Honda Accord
'08 Honda NPS50
'03 Kawasaki Ninja 250
'60 Honda Super Cub
Location: DC Metro Area
Contact:

Post

wingFeather wrote:Don't they look at the track record of 3rd party winners, the primary vote count (as unscientific as that is), etc... ? To me, it looks like they have better odds winning the lotto.
Few if any of the third party candidates believe they stand any chance to win. Some run to get attention for the cause of their party, others run due to dissatisfaction with the two-party dynamic, and some for other reasons.

This is a good topic. You should start a "Third Party Candidates" thread, and we can all discuss it in there. Seriously, please do. I think it's a good issue.

User avatar
srellim234
Posts: 2710
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2007 8:12 am
Car: 2007 Nissan Versa SL hatch w/CVT
(sold 08/2011)
2008 Toyota Prius
(purchased 04/2016)
Location: Laughlin, NV

Post

Locked at the top of this forum is a set of links to 51 political parties here in the U.S.A.

It also includes a link to the candidates that have been nominated by those parties.

As for Texas, I think that McCain would probably still win, even if he is excluded from the ballot. You would see one huge write-in campaign for him there.

Absolutely the law should be enforced and let the major parties spend their money trying to wage write-in campaigns for their candidates. It serves them right for being so arrogant.

User avatar
AZhitman
Administrator
Posts: 54538
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2002 2:04 am
Car: 58 L210, 63 Bluebird RHD, 64 NL320, 65 SPL310, 66 411 RHD, 67 WRL411, 68 510 SR20, 75 280Z RB25, 77 620 SR20, 79 B310, 90 Z32, 91 GTi-R, 92 Silvia Qs, 98 S14, 23 Z.
Location: Surprise, Arizona
Contact:

Post

What a colossal eff-up THAT was.

They should slap each other.

User avatar
HashiriyaS14
Posts: 14298
Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2003 8:02 pm
Car: '95 Nissan 240SX
'08 Honda Accord
'08 Honda NPS50
'03 Kawasaki Ninja 250
'60 Honda Super Cub
Location: DC Metro Area
Contact:

Post

srellim234 wrote:Absolutely the law should be enforced and let the major parties spend their money trying to wage write-in campaigns for their candidates. It serves them right for being so arrogant.
Yeah, I guess that's an idea, I hadn't thought of that. I imagine that McCain would still get more write-ins than Barr would get regular votes, meaning that he'd still carry the state and Obama wouldn't get a shoe-in national victory.

Oh well, I can dream, lol.


Return to “Politics Etc.”