Q45tech wrote:????????????????
Say what--- the J and 90-96 Q share the exact same caliper and rotor on the front .....the pad composition is a little different due to J's lighter weight and of course no sensor
The rears are different: Q solid/J vented much like the 97 and up Q. But the front are the real warpers so the extra 300-400 pounds is what does it as the Q got lighter the problem got better!
It's all about using the parts you have and not spending much on a redesign if it only affects 10% of your customers.
In effect, the "newer" design of the J's beaking system used a heavier front rotor and redisigned rear rotors for the weight of the car compared to the Q. Fortunatley for Nissan, the Q's existing rotors seemed to have filled the bill quite nicely for the front brakes.
Unfortunately for Nissan however, their new model only eventually captured 10% of their customer base. I am sure that Nissan wanted the J to sell much better than it did. The amount of units they moved must have been greatly dissappointing for them because they did invest a good amount of resources designing and manufacturing the J30. Management was surely hoping to move a lot more of these things than the 200,000ish they eventually did sell. They, no doubt, hoped that the J would comprise a great deal higher percentage of their fleet sales in order to justify their investment. Building this expensive design was one of the factors that got Nissan into financial trouble in the mid 90's. They built it but no one came.
One of the reasons I find the J so much fun to drive is the quality of its braking system: very sure, strong and (at least in my case) no warping.