I don't see what's silly about it. A dyno is a good way to compare numbers as a bench mark. Everyone knows a Dynojet gives liberal numbers while a Mustang dyno give conservative numbers, etc. etc. I didn't say big dyno numbers means a fast car. I've been building and racing cars for 16 years, I don't need a lesson on what a dyno does. All I'm saying is that it would just be nice to have a dyno thread on here to compare numbers with different setups.Carl H wrote:not gonna lie this is a silly thread...
dyno numbers are worthless, only good for boosting egos.
a dyno is a tuning tool... used to measure changes in response to the tune.
what is your definition of pump gas?
octane rating?
brand?
current mix in the tank?
tuning?
dyno type?
eh? wrote:My RB25 did 507whp @ 20psi on straight pump before our tuning session was cut short. The tuner said I should have made about 50whp more. Turbo got hungry and ate a hose (tuner left the air filter off) This was a basic build with stock CR, untouched head. Made power all the way to redline. Turbo was a 6765 .
After repairing the turbo I did run 26psi while street tuning.... no problems.
I know XS engeering has made 7XX on a pump gas RB26 before.
Carl H wrote:you guys are also rocking the RON number only, where us its (RON + MON)/2...your 98 is akin to our 93.
for arguments sake i'll post mine, just to prove how silly a peak number thread is:
93 octane from BP
396whp @ 22psi out of a gt3076r on my rb30, stock ecu...full tune.
dyno dynamics dyno
map based AEM.chad b. wrote:eh? wrote:My RB25 did 507whp @ 20psi on straight pump before our tuning session was cut short. The tuner said I should have made about 50whp more. Turbo got hungry and ate a hose (tuner left the air filter off) This was a basic build with stock CR, untouched head. Made power all the way to redline. Turbo was a 6765 .
After repairing the turbo I did run 26psi while street tuning.... no problems.
I know XS engeering has made 7XX on a pump gas RB26 before.
507 with a stock head and cams on pump gas. That's what I'm talking about! What engine management were you running?
Then you shouldn't have a problem with your power goals in the octane departmentchad b. wrote:We have 93 here.
Super rare. From the sounds of it, even less common than it is in the states. It's an Aussie only thing I guess. They do like the little extra gain in displacement for huge sums of money strokers here though. My buddy just split the crank in his HKS 2.8L stoker not too long ago.StricNyne wrote:in japan is rb30 common ?, i heard they are big on the 2.8 strokers out there
Cjmartz2k wrote:Carl H wrote:you guys are also rocking the RON number only, where us its (RON + MON)/2...your 98 is akin to our 93.
for arguments sake i'll post mine, just to prove how silly a peak number thread is:
93 octane from BP
396whp @ 22psi out of a gt3076r on my rb30, stock ecu...full tune.
dyno dynamics dyno
I was actaully converting it already. The posted numbers are 102 octane IIRC.
I'd love to try your set up out on some of the tight and twisty back roads we have over here. It must be a handful trying to keep that much grunt planted
It's getting an AEM, and I'm gonna have Rolo at CentraFloridaTurbo tune it.ItzGenX wrote:Then you shouldn't have a problem with your power goals in the octane departmentchad b. wrote:We have 93 here.. You'll just need a nice tune, and then you are set.
chad b. wrote:I know John (Alpha). I've met him several times. He's a big Honda guy. Nothing against him, he's cool, but if I don't get it tuned locally, I'm taking it to CFT.