Post by
tyrannix »
https://forums.nicoclub.com/tyrannix-u27595.html
Thu Jul 27, 2006 8:22 am
thats what i was thinking too, but takakaira only lists 89mm. i seem to remember a bit ago that they carried 2 sizes. but these are listed as matching to the 'stroker' crankshaft (which im waiting on a reply from tehm about to see if it is fully counterbalanced, the description might say otherwise)
but yeah, totally blanked on the equation for volume od a cylinder, thought it was diameter * pi * height (was trying to take a rectangular prism formula and make it round)
so your equations:V = pi * (r^2) * hV = 3.14159 * (4.45cm(bore)^2) * 8.36cm (stroke)V = 3.14159 * (19.8025) * 8.36V = 520.09ccV x 4cyl = 2080.36cc
and ill add the extra 20mm height for the CA20 block
V = pi * (r^2) * hV = 3.14159 * (4.45cm(bore)^2) * 8.36cm (stroke)V = 3.14159 * (19.8025) * 8.36V = 520.09ccV x 4cyl = 2080.36cc------------------------V2 = pi * (r^2) * hV2 = 3.14159* (4.45(radius of bore) ^2) * 2cm (extra height)V2 = 3.14159 * (19.8025) * 2V2 = 124.42ccV2 X 4cyl = 497.68cc
X = V + V2X = 2080.36cc + 497.68ccX = 2578.04cc
please tell me i funked something up?if not, and i use those pistons, it will be almost square again, and be just under 2.6l
holy crap
somebody check me, im almost scared that i am correct on it
keep in mind, this is a supposed stroker kit for a 1.8l, to make it 2l, but to use it on a CA20 block which is 2cm taller
if i am right, this could be a rediculous engine, with low down torque, spooling a bigger turbo up faster, and still able to rev (maybe even close to the same as stock, being back to almost square)
CJ