To actually answer your question, there is no reason why you cannot move the existing maf from its current position (termed a blow through setup) to before the turbo or a draw through setup. The only limitation is that a stock maf can only measure a certain amount of air flow, approximately 250 whp worth. The 300zx maf can measure a whole lot more.radominghez2 wrote:On the 240sx I bought it has the mass air flow sensor right next to the intercooler and I was talking to a friend about moving it to the intake side of the turbo. He told me that I couldn't that I need to get a 300zx mass air flow sensor to do that. Is that true and why?
Yeah I running a open BOV.480sx wrote:Plenty of people run blow through and have had success. There was someone who posted here the other day who has ran blow through for 2 years with the same MAF. The charge air after going through the IC typically isnt much hotter than the intake air in the first place. Have you ever run a blow through setup Redtop?
Why dont you like blow through FL?
To the OP: Typically the MAF goes on the intake side of the turbo. The way your car is setup it sounds like hes done a blow through setup. The unit is water sealed, i mean it probably wouldnt like it much if it was immersed in water but its most likely fine where it is. Are you running an open BOV?
Nah. I helped tune my friend's blow through on his 3SGTE with a blow thru setup. There are definitely a lot of benefits like you guys mentioned, but he was going through MAFS every 2 weeks.480sx wrote: Have you ever run a blow through setup Redtop?
Why dont you like blow through FL?
Way to go not mentioning the fact that it was a Toyota setup and not a Nissan. Makes your statement pretty much irrelevant to the discussion.redtop91 wrote:
Nah. I helped tune my friend's blow through on his 3SGTE with a blow thru setup. There are definitely a lot of benefits like you guys mentioned, but he was going through MAFS every 2 weeks.
radominghez2 wrote:On the 240sx I bought it has the mass air flow sensor right next to the intercooler and I was talking to a friend about moving it to the intake side of the turbo. He told me that I couldn't that I need to get a 300zx mass air flow sensor to do that. Is that true and why?
Hmmm last time I checked a MAF is a MAF no matter what car it's on. The effects of pressurized, hot air don't change based on motor. Toyota or Nissan, the situation is the same. And yeah She's smokin IMO.Ligouri Rd wrote:Way to go not mentioning the fact that it was a Toyota setup and not a Nissan. Makes your statement pretty much irrelevant to the discussion.
Many of the older Toyotas used a Vane Air Flow Meter. Basically it used a door that is held in the shut position by a spring until air is drawn through. The airflow forces the door to open in proportion to the air going through it. The position of the door via a pentiometer tells the ECU how much air is flowing through it. As Ligouri Rd stated, they are senstive to oil. Blow-through MAF's are put after the turbo and thus after the crankcase input. As hot-wire MAF's run at high temps and also run a brief high temp burn off upon shutdown, there is no effect from the oil in the intake air.redtop91 wrote:Hmmm last time I checked a MAF is a MAF no matter what car it's on. The effects of pressurized, hot air don't change based on motor. Toyota or Nissan, the situation is the same. And yeah She's smokin IMO.
End of Thread. Where does the manufac have it? Follow them IMO. You can do what you like it's not my car or $$$.WDRacing wrote:Toyota actually uses a different type of MAF Ryon. Atleast they do on the Supr, they only read air going in, not out...if that makes sense.
A maf is a maf though...and any increased friction or force will decrease the life span of any item.
To the OP, you can put the MAF anywhere you want and it will work. But everything has it's up and downs...the choice is yours.
I'm a pull through guy myself, Nissan and Toyota have been building turbo cars for years...they place the MAF before the turbo.
WD