Mass Air flow sensor question

Your premier source for information on the Turbo KA: KA24E-T and KA24DE-T (KA with aftermarket turbo kit)!
radominghez2
Posts: 6
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2007 8:27 pm
Car: None looking to buy 240SX

Post

On the 240sx I bought it has the mass air flow sensor right next to the intercooler and I was talking to a friend about moving it to the intake side of the turbo. He told me that I couldn't that I need to get a 300zx mass air flow sensor to do that. Is that true and why?


User avatar
redtop91
Posts: 16325
Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 9:05 am
Car: ↑ ↑ ↓ ↓ ← → ← → B A Start

Post

No matter what MAF's you use, blow through on a factory MAF is not a good idea. The air that the MAF deals with before the turbo is unpressurized and fairly cool. The compressed air that a blow thru is hot and puts much more stress on the MAFS. Unless you want to change MAFS weekly I suggest you forgo blow thru. Go MAP.

Florida240sx
Posts: 11114
Joined: Thu Jul 01, 2004 7:17 am
Car: 1993 Nissan 240SX Hatch 5spd
2012 Nissan Altima S coupe 2.5
Location: DeLand FL

Post

I don't like blow thru but whatever floats your boat. Blowthru has had issues before but helps stalling.. It's all about the tune though.

User avatar
Ligouri Rd
Posts: 449
Joined: Wed Oct 02, 2002 9:02 am
Car: '96 Nissan 240SX

Post

radominghez2 wrote:On the 240sx I bought it has the mass air flow sensor right next to the intercooler and I was talking to a friend about moving it to the intake side of the turbo. He told me that I couldn't that I need to get a 300zx mass air flow sensor to do that. Is that true and why?
To actually answer your question, there is no reason why you cannot move the existing maf from its current position (termed a blow through setup) to before the turbo or a draw through setup. The only limitation is that a stock maf can only measure a certain amount of air flow, approximately 250 whp worth. The 300zx maf can measure a whole lot more.

Also if you move your maf to before the turbo and you have an open atmosphere blow off valve, the car will run rich briefly when you blow off. Minor issue, the engine may pop on shifts or at worse stall a bit upon sudden deceleration. This can be rectified by recirculating the bov.

Is there a reason you want to move the maf, is there a problem with the existing (blow through) setup? IMO: If it aint broke don't fix it.

radominghez2
Posts: 6
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2007 8:27 pm
Car: None looking to buy 240SX

Post

Well the way he set it up the intercooler don't set right and I live in colorado. I dont want anything hitting it down there or alot of moisture but I don't even know thats even a to be considered a problem. I basicly wanted to know if it was alright where it is and if i decided to move if I really do need the 330zx maf where iI want to put it.

User avatar
480sx
Posts: 4085
Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2006 5:27 pm
Car: 1996 Pearl White 240sx

Post

Plenty of people run blow through and have had success. There was someone who posted here the other day who has ran blow through for 2 years with the same MAF. The charge air after going through the IC typically isnt much hotter than the intake air in the first place. Have you ever run a blow through setup Redtop?

Why dont you like blow through FL?

To the OP: Typically the MAF goes on the intake side of the turbo. The way your car is setup it sounds like hes done a blow through setup. The unit is water sealed, i mean it probably wouldnt like it much if it was immersed in water but its most likely fine where it is. Are you running an open BOV?

radominghez2
Posts: 6
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2007 8:27 pm
Car: None looking to buy 240SX

Post

480sx wrote:Plenty of people run blow through and have had success. There was someone who posted here the other day who has ran blow through for 2 years with the same MAF. The charge air after going through the IC typically isnt much hotter than the intake air in the first place. Have you ever run a blow through setup Redtop?

Why dont you like blow through FL?

To the OP: Typically the MAF goes on the intake side of the turbo. The way your car is setup it sounds like hes done a blow through setup. The unit is water sealed, i mean it probably wouldnt like it much if it was immersed in water but its most likely fine where it is. Are you running an open BOV?
Yeah I running a open BOV.

User avatar
redtop91
Posts: 16325
Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 9:05 am
Car: ↑ ↑ ↓ ↓ ← → ← → B A Start

Post

480sx wrote: Have you ever run a blow through setup Redtop?

Why dont you like blow through FL?
Nah. I helped tune my friend's blow through on his 3SGTE with a blow thru setup. There are definitely a lot of benefits like you guys mentioned, but he was going through MAFS every 2 weeks.

User avatar
Ligouri Rd
Posts: 449
Joined: Wed Oct 02, 2002 9:02 am
Car: '96 Nissan 240SX

Post

redtop91 wrote:
Nah. I helped tune my friend's blow through on his 3SGTE with a blow thru setup. There are definitely a lot of benefits like you guys mentioned, but he was going through MAFS every 2 weeks.
Way to go not mentioning the fact that it was a Toyota setup and not a Nissan. Makes your statement pretty much irrelevant to the discussion.

Ps: -Hayley Williams?..nice!

bruinbear714
Posts: 1159
Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2002 9:58 pm
Contact:

Post

Why would want to do that? If it's to fix engine stalls due to blow off valve opening, it's a tedious job to fix a simple problem. Just recirculate your blow off valve back into the intake after the MAF, and leave about 6 inches of space before and after the MAF since a Z32 maf has the sensor element directly in the airflow path.
radominghez2 wrote:On the 240sx I bought it has the mass air flow sensor right next to the intercooler and I was talking to a friend about moving it to the intake side of the turbo. He told me that I couldn't that I need to get a 300zx mass air flow sensor to do that. Is that true and why?

User avatar
WDRacing
Moderator
Posts: 15983
Joined: Mon Nov 25, 2002 2:00 am
Car: 95 240SX, 99 BMW 540i, 01 Chevy Express, 14 Ford Escape
Location: MFFO
Contact:

Post

Lets just talk in facts for a second and then the OP can make a decision.

In the KA world, the MAF has been placed on the cold side of the IC plenty of times with great success.

If you move the MAF to before the turbo you will suffer from stalling issues etc when the BOV vents. Unless corrected with a SAFC or similar device.

If you upgrade to the 300ZX maf, (N62), then you'll need to get either a ECU tune for that MAF or use a SAFC or similar piggy back. The car will not run with a different maf unless it's tuned.

If you want to move the maf because of the IC issue, why not just move it farther up the cold pipe. Say 12" or so from the throttle body itself.

WD

User avatar
redtop91
Posts: 16325
Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 9:05 am
Car: ↑ ↑ ↓ ↓ ← → ← → B A Start

Post

Ligouri Rd wrote:Way to go not mentioning the fact that it was a Toyota setup and not a Nissan. Makes your statement pretty much irrelevant to the discussion.
Hmmm last time I checked a MAF is a MAF no matter what car it's on. The effects of pressurized, hot air don't change based on motor. Toyota or Nissan, the situation is the same. And yeah She's smokin IMO.

User avatar
Ligouri Rd
Posts: 449
Joined: Wed Oct 02, 2002 9:02 am
Car: '96 Nissan 240SX

Post

Fundamentally yes a maf is a maf, it does the same thing. However the way the wire is exposed or secured in the sensor is different from manufacturer to manufacturer. Nissan mafs are relatively tough, i dropped my Z32 half a dozen times and it still works flawlessly. I know a few people who merely looked at a mr2 maf the wrong way and caused them to fail. They are also particularly sensitive to oil contamination and leaky turbo bearings will wreak havok on them.

User avatar
redtop91
Posts: 16325
Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 9:05 am
Car: ↑ ↑ ↓ ↓ ← → ← → B A Start

Post

In my experience Toyota parts take more abuse than Nissan. Either way you can have a uber MAF, it matters not[/yoda]. the point I'm making is regardless of starting MAF durability, Blow thru will reduce that durability.

User avatar
WDRacing
Moderator
Posts: 15983
Joined: Mon Nov 25, 2002 2:00 am
Car: 95 240SX, 99 BMW 540i, 01 Chevy Express, 14 Ford Escape
Location: MFFO
Contact:

Post

Toyota actually uses a different type of MAF Ryon. Atleast they do on the Supr, they only read air going in, not out...if that makes sense.

A maf is a maf though...and any increased friction or force will decrease the life span of any item.

To the OP, you can put the MAF anywhere you want and it will work. But everything has it's up and downs...the choice is yours.

I'm a pull through guy myself, Nissan and Toyota have been building turbo cars for years...they place the MAF before the turbo.

WD

User avatar
C-Kwik
Moderator
Posts: 8070
Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2002 9:28 pm
Car: 2013 Chevy Volt, 1991 Honda CRX DX

Post

redtop91 wrote:Hmmm last time I checked a MAF is a MAF no matter what car it's on. The effects of pressurized, hot air don't change based on motor. Toyota or Nissan, the situation is the same. And yeah She's smokin IMO.
Many of the older Toyotas used a Vane Air Flow Meter. Basically it used a door that is held in the shut position by a spring until air is drawn through. The airflow forces the door to open in proportion to the air going through it. The position of the door via a pentiometer tells the ECU how much air is flowing through it. As Ligouri Rd stated, they are senstive to oil. Blow-through MAF's are put after the turbo and thus after the crankcase input. As hot-wire MAF's run at high temps and also run a brief high temp burn off upon shutdown, there is no effect from the oil in the intake air.

Many Aftermarket kits for current Nissans run blow-though MAF set ups and have no issues from it. Just look at the set ups of many RWD VQ turbo and S/C kits. Most run blow-through. I know in the past, we had quite a few people trying the blow-through set ups on KA's in here as well. A Hot-wire styles shouldn't have any issues with it. A Vane Air Flow Meter might as it doesn't measure the mass of air, but the volume. As turbocharged air is denser, it would be off by the amount of pressure being read. I doubt there would be any easy way to incorporate this type of sensor as a blow-through as pressure would not be kept constant.

User avatar
redtop91
Posts: 16325
Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 9:05 am
Car: ↑ ↑ ↓ ↓ ← → ← → B A Start

Post

Ah yes the flapper MAF. It is more durable than people give it credit for but I see your point.

Florida240sx
Posts: 11114
Joined: Thu Jul 01, 2004 7:17 am
Car: 1993 Nissan 240SX Hatch 5spd
2012 Nissan Altima S coupe 2.5
Location: DeLand FL

Post

WDRacing wrote:Toyota actually uses a different type of MAF Ryon. Atleast they do on the Supr, they only read air going in, not out...if that makes sense.

A maf is a maf though...and any increased friction or force will decrease the life span of any item.

To the OP, you can put the MAF anywhere you want and it will work. But everything has it's up and downs...the choice is yours.

I'm a pull through guy myself, Nissan and Toyota have been building turbo cars for years...they place the MAF before the turbo.

WD
End of Thread. Where does the manufac have it? Follow them IMO. You can do what you like it's not my car or $$$.


Return to “KA24ET / KA24DET Forum”