bah.maf > map.Kamin wrote:as far as i know you need a standalone to do it
yes its possible, and its a great idea if you are going standalone.
Its easier to tune with a MAF, especially if you live in a mountainous area, bc elevation messes with the MAP readings. However, I will prob still go MAP when I get a standalone, bc in OKlahoma we have no mountains or much of a change in elevation, and I wont have to worry about having to recirc the BOV.Carl H wrote:bah.maf > map.
I believe you will need a RB26 PFC to do that. I don't think the RB25 has two inputs for MAFS.Carl H wrote:q45 maf will read up to 700hp worth of air...z32 can read 500hp...if you need more then twin a z32 setup or for rediculous power twin a q45.
tru but seriously anyone going for 700+hp in a s chassis is retarded, you'll have so much power you'll go backwards.q45 is pretty much top upgrade for anyone chasing powah!eh? wrote:
I believe you will need a RB26 PFC to do that. I don't think the RB25 has two inputs for MAFS.
yeah, the map ecu is simmilar to the old hks pfc but has much more tuneability.the only problem with the map-ecu setup is that it is still is nothing more than a glorified safc.its a maf signal interceptor and still relys on the stock ecu for its timing maps and fuel maps...it works for sure and makes power (as the supra guys have proven) but its still not ideal.one of my good supra friends runs a map ecu but is proly gonna go with an aem setup as he is on the verge of maxing out the map-ecu's capabilities.lots of possiblities for fuel management...tough choice for sure.DrifterTom wrote:you definateley can get rid of the maf. my car runs a map-ecu. this is very popular with the supras. i know at least a handful running the map-ecu with 700hp+ to the wheels and passing emissions. http://www.map-ecu.com a good alternative, but extensive dynotime b/c there isn't a published map for rb's yet.