For one, there aren't going to be children in the audience of a stand-up comedian. Two, if you're looking at the same Asian person and making the brocorri comment with squinty eyes on repeated occasions, it's no longer funny. It's you being a racist prick. Three, having the Dad beat up the other guy has the offending father being arrested for assault and battery. All of those things you said, teach our children exactly how they shouldn't be acting.Looneybomber wrote:Hey I'm all for the dad of the 10y/o with CP popping this guy in the mouth, but any monetary fines, community service, or time spent in jail is just stupid...as stupid as an adult making fun of a person's handicap. What's next, comedians getting jailed because they say brocorri with squinty eyes?
This in as of itself is stupid but not against the law. What he teaches his kids is up to him.WDRacing wrote:What we have here is a parent, with his own child in tow, making fun of another child with a handicap. He's teaching his own kids that it's ok to treat handicapped children like crap. What else is he teaching his kids?
Without any prior history what the guy did should result in nothing via the law. It should have resulted in him being busted in the mouth instead. Of course we can't have that happening either. Showing the guy to be the a** he is to everyone in his town should have been good enough to stop him from doing that s*** again.WDRacing wrote: You can look at this in two ways. One, you're ok with sort of behavior. If this is the case, you're character sucks and you should culled from society.
Two, you realize that this dude, who has a prior history of being a prick, finally got justice dealt to him. Making fun of someone with CB is NOT OK.
So instead I need to teach them to fear big brother and walk on egg shells while in public, otherwise, you may get arrested for offending a person eaves dropping on your joke, or for telling someone they have BO.WDRacing wrote:All of those things you said, teach our children exactly how they shouldn't be acting.
themadscientist wrote:
That his treatment of this child is detestable is a given, but there are ways to deal with him. I would send the videos to his employer and post them on youtube. I would make him famous "this is such and such and this is what he did. You decide what you think." He said and did what he did, it's not slander. He would become a pariah for the rest of his life and he did it to himself. His child would come to know his father was a piece of s*** and their relationship would be altered forever. I like that.
Or, we could beat him with wiffleball bats....
Read this whole article. It explains the case a bit more than the Fox link.Looneybomber wrote: So instead I need to teach them to fear big brother and walk on egg shells while in public, otherwise, you may get arrested for offending a person eaves dropping on your joke, or for telling someone they have BO.
If you can arrest someone for making fun of one person, you have to arrest everyone for making fun of people. You can't just arrest some, but not others, that's discrimination. And as stated, if you can arrest someone for offending them through mockery, what other things can we arrest folks for? There's that slippery slope.
This. I got the non-FOX-News-hyped version from this legal blog: http://www.volokh.com/WDRacing wrote:themadscientist wrote:
That his treatment of this child is detestable is a given, but there are ways to deal with him. I would send the videos to his employer and post them on youtube. I would make him famous "this is such and such and this is what he did. You decide what you think." He said and did what he did, it's not slander. He would become a pariah for the rest of his life and he did it to himself. His child would come to know his father was a piece of s*** and their relationship would be altered forever. I like that.
Or, we could beat him with wiffleball bats....Read this whole article. It explains the case a bit more than the Fox link.Looneybomber wrote: So instead I need to teach them to fear big brother and walk on egg shells while in public, otherwise, you may get arrested for offending a person eaves dropping on your joke, or for telling someone they have BO.
If you can arrest someone for making fun of one person, you have to arrest everyone for making fun of people. You can't just arrest some, but not others, that's discrimination. And as stated, if you can arrest someone for offending them through mockery, what other things can we arrest folks for? There's that slippery slope.
http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/headlines/2 ... bled-girl/
He receives a menacing charge by threatening to kill the mother. Which he plead no contest to.
Bailey, she said, “was swinging a tow chain on his porch, saying he was going to choke me until I stopped twitching. I sent my kids with my mother-in-law to leave with them. My husband called the sheriff.”
In Ohio, a menacing charge is a misdemeanor fourth degree, which carries a maximum of 30 days in jail.
The other charge was disorderly conduct, it carries no jail time.
Bailey has a prior history that was taken into account by the judge. The judge looks at the entire equation when rendering a decision. This isn't some random act that was misunderstood.
People are arrested for disorderly conduct all the time, this isn't an isolated incident. It just happened to make headlines because of the circumstances.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^Jesda wrote:Well, the "threat" from the gestured hanging is what got him a month in jail, not the mockery.
...and I fell for it.Dattebayo wrote:Gee, Fox news doesn't look at the whole story? NO! You don't say.
That.Jesda wrote:To be fair, that was posted on their blog. Same organization, different standards. Even the NY Times runs a blog separate from its newspaper, subject to differing journalistic standards. [And even NYT's own journalists have criticized the paper's blog.]