Post by
Larz »
https://forums.nicoclub.com/larz-u216291.html
Wed Jun 12, 2013 9:51 pm
Scratches head to activate the mathematic side of the brain .... You would be getting a newer vehicle with considerably less miles on it (as you drive highways, that would be a plus). As for body style, a 2010 still has that agressive stance whereas the 2011 is the gentler, wavy, 'my dad's car' styling. Don't hate me for saying that because I see tons of newer Ms, so apparently I am one of about 6 peeps who haven't fully embraced the newer design.
As for the extra gadgets, another plus if it's something you will use. Even with 7 speeds in the newer gear box, I doubt the MPG is significantly different for stop and go, but on highways, with ECO it could add up.
The real question is ... as you already said:
how long will it take for a few extra MPG savings (16/22 Vs 17/24) to equal what you will pay in terms of extra cash needed to get the newer, higher priced car ( 27k/2010 Vs 32k/2011) + the extra sales taxes you will pay + possible increase in loan payment + possible increase in insurance rate?
Seems the extra expense is not a problem for you, just justifying it is difficult. But you only have to justify it to yourself, so if you really want more gears and really like the new design and gadgets, that should be justification enough. Go balls-out and get it!