Post by
GreyZone »
https://forums.nicoclub.com/greyzone-u77080.html
Tue Dec 11, 2007 6:55 pm
Thanks Buzzman. Some very, very good points, and stuff I am definitely thinking about as well. My buddy was in the car with me last night...I weigh 230 (6'3") and my buddy is 260 and 6'4." Car still drove and handeled well, but I was just freeway driving, and didn't really get on it. Everyday, I drive to work 30 miles one way on winding mountain roads, and at times really get on it. It's that daily drive I am tuning this suspension for.
Granted, I am putting some un-natural positioning on shocks and springs. They may wear quicker and have to be replaced. Understood. One thing so far (long term would need to be trail and error) is with some very aggressive driving on my part, the handeling has actually improved consdierably, and is hugging the road much better. I could also experiemnt with weight, as 180 is quit a bit. I am also going to put the RSB back in, and see how that works with the weighted ride. Since I toook that off prior to putting in the weights, I dont know how the weights alone would have affected the ride. Altohough I gotta tell ya, roll is practically non-existent. Of course, as parts wear, it would get more noticable, maybe then, put the RSB back on to compensate.
Also, I am wondering what differnce it will make when I lower the front, but I cant imagine it will be anything except good. A slight drawback currently is when I get on it, it understandably has a tendency to front end lift. Of course, this is a no brainer wih all that weight in the truck. I have hit some pretty hard dips, so far the suspension is holding it well, no bottoming out. As the srpings and shocks wear, would it approach bottoming out? Probably, of course, weighting could be reduced accordingly also.
Really, I have just been open to expermenting with different ideas. The weighting was done based on a recommendation that if you reduce the downtravel of the spring you reduce bounce (and that was one of my chief complaints). The dealer said to start at 100 lbs. I never tried that, I just put in 180, and loved it so much I stayed with that. It would be interesting to see what 140 and 100 do to the ride. Additionally, I wouldn't mind replacing springs and/or shocks as they wear. Small price to pay for the ride you want.
In many ways, 180 pounds is also not that much. Many have amps, woofers, ect that approach 100 pounds of weight. Most of my friends are 180 pounds or greater. I am 230 myself. 300 or 400 pounds would worry me, Im not sure 180 does. But I must admit, aspects of this idea are so Mickey Mouse its hard for me to even take myself serioulsy, but when you really look at the dynamics of what has been done, it all really makes good and reasonalbe sense, it has just been a really dorky way to accomplish it. What I know at this point is that I am damn pleased with the results. I went from being very discouraged and frustrated to absolutley loving the way this car new handels. And, I would think this car is tough enough and fast enough to handel 90 lbs of weight on each side of the trunk, without it causing too much in the way of problems. I probably would not do this in the 2.5, but the 3.5 SE is a bit beefier all around.
For now I am really looking forward to getting the front down 1.5" or so, as I think that should improve handeling even more, and reduce the slight frontend rise with acceleration.
And I really appreciate your response to areas of concern with this idea, and I apprecaite you taking it seriously. I am definitely taking this issue of fine tuning the suspension seriously, and getting it exactly the way I want it, including looking all ways of doing it (with in reason). There are definitely some things to watch out for and be cautious with.
As with any modifications we make, there is almost always some give and take. It really gets down to is what your being given worth what's taken away. In my case, so far, it more than has been.