That is weak. What event was this?boost_boy wrote: The neon won with it 322whp
It's something about the RWD platforms or just my hard luck. I've always used the AWD/FWD variants which indeed have their differences, but not to the point whereas it causes these kind of problems. I too was going to send another member an engine set and needed to repair the oil pan and when I opened it up, it looked exactly like my motor only mine was a wee bit cleaner. I think it has something to do with clutch types or release bearings. Never had this problem until I switched disks. Possibly worn release bearing, but I doubt it because I rarely use this car.iliketocrash wrote:anyone have ideas what would cause this to happen? cause i've been hearing about this problem long before i even registered with the forums and i was still only a reader. it seems that you can't fix the problem.
This was an NHRA event and it sucked that I didn't get to participate, let alone see the event from start to finish. I did get to see Stephen Papadakis nail a 6.67 @212mph run . But the neon winning was weak. I even put on the bigger turbo with the .63 back housing which would've netted me that hp if not more around 15psi of boost. Oh well, sh1t happens .Turbogixxer wrote:Damn, Glad to hear you did not get stuck out in BTF. What crank pulley/damper you running? I'm running the stock dampener. I've been using the same dampener for the last 3 years.
That is weak. What event was this?
Hey rafi, thanks for the sympathy! My only suggestion is that my problem lurks around the area of the clutch system. I had installed a new crank, new mains and rod bearings, new oil pump, new seals, and re-installed the clutch that was giving the car problems before. I mean, it did the same exact thing as before, started losing oil pressure and ultimately trashing one of my turbos and causing me to rebuild. I blamed the oil pump, but I have not yet seen a CA18DET oil pump fail yet. Something is putting too much pressure up against the crank and causing the thrust bearing to prematurely fail which ultimately takes out anything else closest to it (ie (#3 rod, #2 rod and mains).pulsar gtr wrote:Dee, sorry to hear about what happened to the new engine, thats was some good money spent there.
I am curious to what might have been causing your problem. Do you have a new oil pump in there? what about the crank pulley or the flywheels, any thing different on these that can cause some resonation on the crank and ultimitley blow the trust bearings or the rod bearings?Man that sucks, best luck dude, i feel for you and your pocket.
Good luck,PULSAR GTRRafi
Indeed it is. I have yet another new crank and oil pump, but i'm taking the entire assembly to my machinist for clarification and balancing. Luckily it didn't destroy my cams or the head.c-rad wrote:Is this the motor that you just put a brand new crank in????
Don't be afraid of it failing, but be prepared to square it away if and when it does. Usually, if your motor is going to do this kind of failure, it does it quickly and not over a 2 or 3 year span.c-rad wrote:You guys are scaring me with all these motor failures. Then again, how many people come on here and post, "Hey, just wanted to let everyone know, the car's running good."
LOL, if and when it does, I will just haul it down to Miami and let you figure it outboost_boy wrote:Don't be afraid of it failing, but be prepared to square it away if and when it does. Usually, if your motor is going to do this kind of failure, it does it quickly and not over a 2 or 3 year span.
Dee
Nismo, when I first put the clutch in, I wasn't having any problems. I went to a stronger clutch because the Kevlar was slipping under boost. As for your issues with disengagement, I wouldn't go for the stanza's release bearing as Rafi suggests only because it will probably make matters worst even though it might work. I suggest taking your flywheel in for inspection and some machining, check your crank for end play and don't be afraid to venture into the unknown.nismoplsr wrote:did the crank move enough to cause hard dissengagements of the clutch? meaning that the crank and assembly moved to far away from the release bearing that it would dissengage or it would barely?
I am still investigating my problem of being unable to dissengage.
I ruled out the problem being the clutch disc or pressure plate. I installed a stock set and that wont dissengage either. I ruled out the throw out bearing by comparing it to a spare i have and also the release fork because i compared that to a spare also.
It is not in the hydraulics. The problem is not the fork not moving enough it is that when the fork is fully pushed the clutch does not dissengage. The fork doesnt seem to come in contact with the pressure plate diaphragm untill further than it is suppose to.
Basically this leave out 2 options, my whole flywheel and crank moving or the "bell housing" stretching.
this is quite the dissapointing and scary story. Dissapointing because of the fact that you could kick some more a** with our beloved CA, and scary because i believe i am running the same clutch setup. or will be running should i say.
This is the one problem I feared happening to me or anyone of us. I had hoped that if it was going to happen, it be to me and not any of you, so that you guys don't get discouraged about the CA. Like I was told, it usually happens to engines that are freshly assembled or have added on an extreme clutch components and is not limited to just the CA18s, but to any engine. So this our test and we're going to have to work together on this one and quickly. My assembly is going to the machine shop today as soon as I get my hands on the new crank. We'll stay in touch on this one.float_6969 wrote:Dee, I personally think that this is a resonance problem. The first thing that I would do would be to take the ENTIRE reciprocating mass down to your machinist and have it all rebalanced. I have a feeling that your new clutch isn't balanced and is causing a vibrating, which is subsequently causing your problems. I would also consider a different clutch if that is at all possible with your horsepower levels.
They all will work, but the pulsar one has a longer lip whereas the stanza's unit is a tad bit shorter, but wider in diameter. Like I said, in over 8 years of toying with the CA series, I've never had this happen to me. This was the least of my worries, but this RWD motor worries me. I've always used the AWD variants and have abused them both with ceramic clutches and kevlar clutches and have not been so puzzled like this one. I'm going to order 2 more FWD/AWD units for safe keeping because I can't afford to experiment like this any more; just too time consuming.pulsar gtr wrote:Hum, I have been using the KA STanza release bearings for over 5 years, but on the other hand I am also using the stanza stageII full feramic clutch and pressure plate, but I know the stanza release bearing will work wiht stock ca18det clutch and pressure plate but not sure if it will work with the CA18DE clutch though.
PULSAR GTRRafi
that member was me, and HUGE props to dee on that, even tho im still waiting 4 him to get his new set of engines in i def choose the right guy, its awesome that he was honest and how he handled it.boost_boy wrote:I too was going to send another member an engine set and needed to repair the oil pan and when I opened it up, it looked exactly like my motor only mine was a wee bit cleaner. I think it has something to do with clutch types or release bearings. Never had this problem until I switched disks. Possibly worn release bearing, but I doubt it because I rarely use this car.
Dee
Oh it hurts! it makes me feel like I just started in this business because no one has a definite answer. I compared my kevlar hub to my ceramic hub and "Houston, we have a problem". The snout is a lot longer than the kevlar one which appears to have the ability to cause extra problem. Oh well, the crank wasn't ready today, so it made no sense at taking the block and stuff to the machinist.originalsin wrote:
that member was me, and HUGE props to dee on that, even tho im still waiting 4 him to get his new set of engines in i def choose the right guy, its awesome that he was honest and how he handled it.
and dee like i told ya in the email, its a shame that all that hard work ended with this, but like said, you gotta pay to play
I will re-assemble everything this weekend and check for any kind of movement of the crank.I did try prying on the flywheel to see if i had any extra play and it didnt seem to move for me. But with the transmission in and someone pushing the clutch while i watch the crank pulley will be easier and more noticable.boost_boy wrote: With your clutch fully assembled and transmission on (if applicable), have someone fully engage the clutch while you check your vibration dampener or crankshaft pulley for movement. If your crank moved while the car was running, you've already started the damage process. If your crank doesn't move, then you don't have this particular crank walk movement to worry about and can focus on something else.
The transmission mount and rear engine mount are brand new and all my mounts are window-welded.boost_boy wrote:
The answer to your 1st question is "yes". It was kinda tough to disengage and felt funny when I fully pushed the clutch in as well. One more thing I wanted to warn you about is the mounts. Make sure your mounts arer in good shape and not adding extra stress on the transmission. Any uneven activity from the engine and transmission positioning is a no-no and it too will cause problems.
More information on this Dee?boost_boy wrote: Oh it hurts! it makes me feel like I just started in this business because no one has a definite answer. I compared my kevlar hub to my ceramic hub and "Houston, we have a problem". The snout is a lot longer than the kevlar one which appears to have the ability to cause extra problem.
Dee
Update: After pow-wowing for over an hour with Dave at clutch house in Ft. Lauderdale, playing with measurements from my old kevlar clutch, and watching him manually stress-test my clutches against my flywheel, we can safely conclude that it is indeed the clutch disk's spline and hub that is too high causing the tip of disk's spline race to be too close to the transmission's spline shaft sleeve. I noticed I had to drive in the bolts to close the transmission and when you force or semi-force anything together, it usually ends with disaster. I'll try and clarify more to those who don't understand.nismoplsr wrote:
More information on this Dee?
They based this off calculating lengths of the transmission's spline shaft sleeve, height of the release bearing's lip, height of the hub assembly and it's spline shaft guide/housing. My machinist hit it right on the head without asking me a gang of questions. The 1st question he asked was "what did you change or add in your gearbox that could've caused this problem. He then went on to try and answer his own question by calling out the clutch disk, release bearing or a loose flywheel.float_6969 wrote:THAT is a Jimmy Kicker. Did they say that they thought they could make one that was the correct dimentions? Any sort of recompensation for build it out of specs? What did they have to base it off of? This is quite intresting.
Off topic, Dee, did you get my reply email? I'm really wanting to get something rolling with that SDS ASAP. I'm going to pull all the unnessicary electronics tonight and put it all up on eBay.