LOCK HER UP!

A place for intelligent and well-thought-out discussion involving politics and associated topics. No nonsense will be tolerated at all.
User avatar
RCA
Posts: 8226
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 8:09 am

Post

WaPo reports that Ivanka Trump used a personal email account to send hundreds of emails about government business last year.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/ivanka-trump-used-a-personal-email-account-to-send-hundreds-of-emails-about-government-business-last-year/2018/11/19/6515d1e0-e7a1-11e8-a939-9469f1166f9d_story.html wrote:Some aides were startled by the volume of Ivanka Trump’s personal emails — and taken aback by her response when questioned about the practice. Ivanka said she was not familiar with some details of the rules, according to people with knowledge of her reaction.
We have been here before in February of 2017:
https://www.newsweek.com/ivanka-trump-personal-email-account-white-house-670700 wrote:In a statement to Newsweek, a White House spokesperson pointed out that Trump was not a federal employee at the time she sent the February 28 email. When she became a federal employee in March, “she made clear that one of her reasons for doing so was to ensure that she would have access to government-issued communications devices and receive an official email account to protect government records,” the spokesperson said. The spokesperson added that prior to her obtaining an official account, Trump’s emailing other official accounts “ensured the records were preserved and available under the Federal Records Act.” Trump did not have an official email account as a first daughter at the time, according to the spokesperson.
I am expecting Tom Fitton from conservative watch dog Judicial Watch to be all over this.

Looking forward to hearing people in Trump rallies chant for Ivanka to be arrested.

Crooked Ivanka!


User avatar
Bubba1
Moderator
Posts: 18355
Joined: Wed Oct 30, 2002 1:42 pm
Car: 2003 Nissan 350z
2008 Acura TSX
2008 Toyota Corolla S
2001 Toyota Avalon XLS

Post

There's undeniable hypocrisy with Ivanka's breaking the same rules as Hillary, especially after the "Great Pumpkin" made such a big public stink of Hillary doing it during his campaign. I guess one could argue... briefly... that part of Hillary's self inflicted mess included the disappearance of thousands of her emails, and the "classified" nature of some of them (though curiously, many became "classified" after she sent them). Problem is it's too early to clear Ivanka. Just like Hillary, Ivanka claimed none of hers were classified and she insisted she'd happily turn over everything, nothing deleted. well, it remains to be seen whether Ivanka actually follows thru with it or if she attempts Hillary's Texas two step escape manuever after making the exact same claims. Had the RNC retained the House in the midterms, this incident would've been ignored completely, with Dems crying coverup. Now with the Dems in control of the House, expect a full-blown investigation with the RNC crying witch hunt. I see both Ivanka and Hillary as being arrogant, both exercising very poor judgement, and both guilty of breaking government rules in the same area. So, lock 'em both up for this? Probably not. But it's seems clear both acted recklessly.

User avatar
telcoman
Posts: 5763
Joined: Sat Jul 08, 2006 11:30 am
Car: Tesla 2022 Model Y, 2016 Q70 Bye 2012 G37S 6 MT w Nav 94444 mi bye 2006 Infiniti G35 Sedan 6 MT @171796 mi.
Location: Central NJ

Post

Been very quiet here lately

Finally some good news out of the Trump presidency

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/polit...EPp?li=BBnb7Kz


"WASHINGTON — Despite President Donald Trump's public declaration that he isn't concerned about impeachment, he has told people close to him in recent days that he is alarmed by the prospect, according to multiple sources.Trump's fear about the possibility has escalated as the consequences of federal investigations involving his associates and Democratic control of the House sink in, the sources said, and his allies believe maintaining the support of establishment Republicans he bucked to win election is now critical to saving his presidency.On Wednesday Trump was delivered another blow when federal prosecutors announced an agreement with American Media Inc., in which the publisher of the National Enquirer admitted to making a $150,000 payment in 2016 to silence a woman alleging an affair with Trump, in coordination with his presidential campaign, to prevent her story from influencing the election.The agreement with prosecutors in the Southern District of New York follows the admission by the president's former personal lawyer, Michael Cohen, that he violated campaign finance laws by arranging hush payments to women in 2016 at the direction of Trump."The entire question about whether the president committed an impeachable offense now hinges on the testimony of two men: David Pecker and Allen Weisselberg, both cooperating witnesses in the SDNY investigation," a close Trump ally told NBC News.Weisselberg is the chief financial officer for the Trump Organization who was allegedly in the center of the hush money operation. He was reportedly granted immunity for his testimony. Pecker is the chief executive at AMI.The developments leave Trump as the lone party who argues the payments were not intended to influence the election.They also come as Trump's search for a chief of staff is in disarray, with no consensus around a single choice in sight after multiple potential candidates have signaled they're not interested in the job.The president has yet to acquire a team to combat the expected influx of congressional investigations and continued fallout from multiple federal investigations of his associates. He's been calling around to his friends outside the White House and allies on Capitol Hill to vent and get the input. On Wednesday the president wasn't in the Oval Office until noon.The White House declined to comment on this report.

Yet despite his frustrations behind the scenes, Trump has tried to maintain a confident public posture."It's hard to impeach somebody who hasn't done anything wrong and who's created the greatest economy in the history of our country," Trump said Tuesday in an interview with Reuters. "I'm not concerned, no. I think that the people would revolt if that happened."Some Republican lawmakers have signaled cracks in what has been a solid wall of support for Trump amid intensifying federal investigations after prosecutors said Friday that Trump directed Cohen to arrange illegal payments to two women alleging affairs."I am concerned that the president might be involved in a crime," Republican Sen. Bill Cassidy of Louisiana told reporters Tuesday.Republican Sen. Marco Rubio of Florida rattled the White House with similarly cautious remarks Sunday when asked about Trump's possible involvement in the violation of campaign finance laws: "If someone has violated the law, the application of the law should be applied to them like it would to any other citizen in this country, and obviously if you're in a position of great authority like the presidency that would be the case."Rubio said his decision on how Congress should respond to federal investigators' final findings on the payments "will not be a political decision, it'll be the fact that we are a nation of laws and no one in this country no matter who you are is above it."Republican lawmakers, however, have largely shrugged off the latest twists in the investigations involving Trump's close associates and have signaled their strong support for him.The incoming chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, Democrat Jerry Nadler of New York, said that same day that the president may have committed "impeachable offenses."Federal prosecutors in New York state in the court documents that the payments violated campaign finance laws and were arranged by Cohen "in coordination with and at the direction of" Trump.The president has been on a days-long tirade, sources tell NBC News, lashing out at his own staff and lawmakers on Capitol Hill, frustrated by the threat of a Democratic House with subpoena power, an array of looming congressional investigations, multiple intensifying federal probes, a botched effort to find a new chief of staff and a potential partial government shutdown over a lack of funding for his top campaign promise — a border wall.
Trump has ranted about why no one around him is doing anything to stop any of it and vented about the lack of support he believes he has in Congress and within his own White House, the sources tell NBC News.In addition to the much-anticipated report from Mueller on the Russia investigation, Democrats could ask prosecutors in the SDNY to similarly share details of their probe into Cohen that are related to the president.Trump has in recent days been made aware of this possibility from people close to him, opening up a new vulnerability for the president."

Will Trump resign to prevent his children from going to jail?

Stay tuned

Follow the money

Telcoman

User avatar
Rogue One
Administrator
Posts: 8798
Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2011 10:15 pm
Car: 2011 Nissan Rogue SL
2012 Nissan Rogue SL
2012 Honda CR-V LX
2022 Honda Pilot Special Edition
Location: Florida, USA

Post

telcoman wrote:
Thu Dec 13, 2018 6:04 am
"Blah blah blah, meaningless drivel, blah blah blah"

Will Trump resign to prevent his children from going to jail?

Stay tuned

Follow the money

Telcoman
https://i.imgflip.com/ko3bk.jpg

User avatar
Rogue One
Administrator
Posts: 8798
Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2011 10:15 pm
Car: 2011 Nissan Rogue SL
2012 Nissan Rogue SL
2012 Honda CR-V LX
2022 Honda Pilot Special Edition
Location: Florida, USA

Post

telcoman wrote:
Thu Dec 13, 2018 6:04 am
"Blah blah blah, meaningless drivel, blah blah blah"

Will Trump resign to prevent his children from going to jail?

Stay tuned

Follow the money

Telcoman
Image

User avatar
telcoman
Posts: 5763
Joined: Sat Jul 08, 2006 11:30 am
Car: Tesla 2022 Model Y, 2016 Q70 Bye 2012 G37S 6 MT w Nav 94444 mi bye 2006 Infiniti G35 Sedan 6 MT @171796 mi.
Location: Central NJ

Post

Some more blah blah blah! :)

Maria Butina Pleads Guilty to Role in a Russian Effort to Influence Conservatives

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/12/13/us/p ... e=Homepage

Trump Inaugural Fund and Super PAC Said to Be Scrutinized for Illegal Foreign Donations

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/12/13/us/p ... e=Homepage

Cohen Says ‘Of Course’ Trump Knew Hush Payments to Women Were Wrong

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/12/14/us/p ... e=Homepage

I don't think Hillary is the one facing a lock up anytime soon

But there are many others


All of Robert Mueller’s indictments and plea deals in the Russia investigation so far
That we know of.

https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics ... grand-jury

"Special counsel Robert Mueller’s team has indicted or gotten guilty pleas from 33 people and three companies that we know of — the latest being former Trump lawyer Michael Cohen.

That group is composed of five former Trump advisers, 26 Russian nationals, three Russian companies, one California man, and one London-based lawyer. Seven of these people (including now all five former Trump aides) have pleaded guilty.

If you also count investigations that Mueller originated but then referred elsewhere in the Justice Department, you can add a plea deal from one more person to the list.

It’s a sprawling set of allegations, encompassing both election interference charges against overseas Russians, and various other crimes by American Trump advisers."

Follow the money

Telcoman

User avatar
AZhitman
Administrator
Posts: 71063
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2002 2:04 am
Car: 58 L210, 63 Bluebird RHD, 64 NL320, 65 SPL310, 66 411 RHD, 67 WRL411, 68 510 SR20, 75 280Z RB25, 77 620 SR20, 79 B310, 90 S13, 92 SE-R, 92 Silvia Qs, 98 S14.
Location: Surprise, Arizona
Contact:

Post

More drivel and lunacy from the NY Times?

Sometimes, I miss the days when you cited HuffPo and MotherJones as 'credible, unbiased sources.'

BTW, I'm sure you're having a stroke over the latest non-news and [finally] admission that there's simply no evidence of collusion.

Meanwhile, tell your homegirl Kamala "Tha Real K-Dawg" Harris to quit making up Obama-esque stories about listening to nonexistent hip-hop and smoking pot in order to appeal to young, mush-headed voters. :)

macgiver
Posts: 1612
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2007 10:21 am

Post

ha hardy ha ha ha - the "Real K-Dawg" that's a good one , get'n real she may be smokin the Special K.

User avatar
RCA
Posts: 8226
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 8:09 am

Post

AZhitman wrote:
Wed Feb 13, 2019 11:00 pm
More drivel and lunacy from the NY Times?

BTW, I'm sure you're having a stroke over the latest non-news and [finally] admission that there's simply no evidence of collusion.

Meanwhile, tell your homegirl Kamala Harris
Yeah NY Times is the real problem.
Founded in 1851, the paper has won 125 Pulitzer Prizes, more than any other newspaper and three Peabody Awards. What blog do you prefer to get your news from? It's like I am taking crazy pills and the whole world has gone mad.

People who voted for Trump shouldn't have anything to say about any politician.
Trump voters need to sit in the corner in time out and think about what they did.

Also do you have a source about the "admission that there is no evidence of collusion"?

User avatar
Rogue One
Administrator
Posts: 8798
Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2011 10:15 pm
Car: 2011 Nissan Rogue SL
2012 Nissan Rogue SL
2012 Honda CR-V LX
2022 Honda Pilot Special Edition
Location: Florida, USA

Post

RCA wrote:
Sat Feb 16, 2019 10:33 am
AZhitman wrote:
Wed Feb 13, 2019 11:00 pm
More drivel and lunacy from the NY Times?

BTW, I'm sure you're having a stroke over the latest non-news and [finally] admission that there's simply no evidence of collusion.

Meanwhile, tell your homegirl Kamala Harris
Yeah NY Times is the real problem.
Founded in 1851, the paper has won 125 Pulitzer Prizes, more than any other newspaper and three Peabody Awards. What blog do you prefer to get your news from? It's like I am taking crazy pills and the whole world has gone mad.

People who voted for Trump shouldn't have anything to say about any politician.
Trump voters need to sit in the corner in time out and think about what they did.

Also do you have a source about the "admission that there is no evidence of collusion"?
:rotfl

So? Sears used to be the world's leading retailer. Resting on your laurels never ends well.

The Gray Lady is far from the grande dame she once was. For years now she has been going heavy on the rouge, lipstick, and eyeliner, using a push-up bra, and gadding about in stiletto heels. She’s become a bit—perhaps more than a bit—of a slut, whoring after youth through pretending to be with-it.

Since the New York Times began to run more and more feature stories, often on its front page, lots of what appears in its pages hasn’t been news, not even close.
https://www.weeklystandard.com/joseph-e ... -gray-lady

Trump supporters should be lauded for putting the brakes on the Democrats goose-steeping the USA towards full on socialism.

User avatar
RCA
Posts: 8226
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 8:09 am

Post

Rogue One wrote:
Sat Feb 16, 2019 1:50 pm
So? Sears used to be the world's leading retailer. Resting on your laurels never ends well.
SOO many issues to tackle with your post.

You are either purposefully being dishonest or you don't understand the issue at hand.
My problem with people putting down the NYTs like it's a tabloid blog is because the people doing that get their news from Fox or think The Federalist, Breitbart, and the Dailycaller are proper news outlets.

If 73yo professional editor and writer Joseph Epstein wants to leave the NYT because he finds it less relevant and more hip I don't have issues with that at all. But just remember Joseph Epstein also checks the paper for who were the starting pitcher for the Sox, the arts section to see who he disagrees with, and the obits for dead buddies.

The reason he left the NYT is not the same reason people on the right dislike the NYT.

To claim so is dishonest.

Do not confuse the two.

Never forget that you once used this as a source:
Rogue One wrote:
Sat Feb 16, 2019 1:50 pm
Trump supporters should be lauded for putting the brakes on the Democrats goose-steeping the USA towards full on socialism.
Do you mean the Texans who received socialism dollars to help get them out from under the flood waters?

Or the rural farmers receiving socialism dollars to help pay for the soy beans they grew and aren't allowed to sell to China because of Trump?

Oh no you must mean the majority of elderly who receive socialist medicare. Or those to injured to work with medicaid.

Check out some of these communists who further goose-stepped the USA towards full on socialism.
  • In 1960, President Dwight D. Eisenhower approved legislation to allow Social Security benefits for disabled workers and their dependents.
  • In 1972, President Richard M. Nixon signed legislation to provide an automatic cost of living allowance each year to offset the cost of inflation. Prior to the new law, annual increases required Congressional approval.
AOC isn't Marx.

Get a grip, read some history.

Stop letting Fox scare you.

User avatar
Rogue One
Administrator
Posts: 8798
Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2011 10:15 pm
Car: 2011 Nissan Rogue SL
2012 Nissan Rogue SL
2012 Honda CR-V LX
2022 Honda Pilot Special Edition
Location: Florida, USA

Post

I have read history. And lived it.
Again, I don't watch FOX News. Learn a different refrain, that one's getting old.
How about you stop shilling?


Return to “Politics Etc.”