Wow, so I talk about weight reduction for months and you come now as if it was your epiphanyJacko3 wrote:I hear people laugh and call the Mitsubishi Evolution a kiddie car. They deride it like its a disease, and yet, there are few 6 and sometimes many 8 cylinders that cannot keep up with it. The Evo has a weight advanatage that should not be ignored inspite of its kiddie car status.
Jacko3 wrote:Hello Folks:
After disgracing many bigger cars so far with my little nissan, I am convinced beyond all reasonable doubt that weight reduction is perhaps one of the best ways to increase gas mileage and improve performance.
A naturally aspirated G that can loose at least 300 - 500 pounds of real weight, can possibly take on or beat a regular G with a stillen supercharger.
Last night, on an inclined hill----maybe 5 - 10 degrees form the horizontal, a 1990 Model Mercedes S-Class 430 or 500 could not outrun my little nissan. In fact, as i reached the 3rd gear---where I have the most power, I began to pull away from him---1 car length away, and this was the big surprise. He could not keep up!
When we got to the top of the hill, we both slowed down and the guy was busy looking at my little nissan as if it was some type of miracle.
Then this morning, a Nissan Titan V-8 with after market exhaust, decided to try out the little nissan. He was so behind my tail that I thought he was going to run over me underneath it. When we took off at the light, it appeared he held up until i hit my third gear, and then I started pulling away from him, slowly but surely and the gap became a good three car lengths away. When we got to the next light, there was respect. He did not try to drag anymore with me because getting a second whooping would not be in the interest of his image and person. LOL!! However, when we got to the next light, smoke was coming from my clutch with a heavy burning smell--maybe i fried my clutch in that effort, but the car still runs great. I am changing my oil at the end fo this month or even next weekend. LOL!
So, why did a 1.6 litre engine car with less than 110 horsepower, if at all it has that amount of power to begin with, beat cars with 4.5 litre and 5.7 litre V-6 and/or V-8 engines with over 250 horses a piece????? The answer is weight. Weight is the worst culprit of performance.
I hear people laugh and call the Mitsubishi Evolution a kiddie car. They deride it like its a disease, and yet, there are few 6 and sometimes many 8 cylinders that cannot keep up with it. The Evo has a weight advanatage that should not be ignored inspite of its kiddie car status.
Weight reducation, my good friends, is a credible way to go. If i told some one that a 110 horepower car can out run a 250 horsepower car, they probably would not beleive me. The G can benefit with light weight materials, a great deal.
I was one of the first Evo owners in the country buying an 03 in early Sept. The curb weight of that car was about 3200lbsSentientbydesign wrote:
The problem with the Evo is that the 08 weighed as much as a G!!!
As they have added more features, technology and power, they've also added weight. If I'm not mistaken, the early generations weighed in well under 3k lbs. The 08 came in at 3,517 lbs.
In 04, Mitsu came out with the Evo RS, it was a 'stripper' Evo with no power windows, locks, no rear wiper, no HIDs, no intercooler sprayer, optional AC and diffs all the way around. This was called the jungle package. You can only get it in red or white. You can tell an RS because the door handles and mirrors will be black. This car weighed about 3100lbsIn 05 Mitsu added the MR which came with the aluminum roof, lighter bbs wheels, 6spd, ACD and LSD, Bilsteins, a larger turbo and more power. The 05 turbo uses a 10.5 However even with the lighter roof, wheels and suspension, the MR with out leather weighed the same as the GSR (regular model) because the 6pd transmission was heavier. In 05 the curb weight of an Evo was just north of 3300lbs. The 05 RS had the aluminum roof but regular suspension and wheels and 5spd so it was the lightest of the bunch, but the suspension was designed for the car with the steel roof not aluminum, so it didn't match up well with the RS, even though it was about 50lbs lighter than the GSR and MR.In 06, the Evo became the IX and was fitted with an even slightly larger turbo and electonically controlled adjustable cam gear on the exhaust side. As far as weight, I'm not completely sure, but I know it wasn't over 3500lbs.Now the new Evo X weighs over 3500lbs, but it also has as many gadgets and gizmos as a fighter jetSentientbydesign wrote:One of the issues is that Mitsubishi started using aluminum suspension parts, then decided to cut cost and went back to steel.
AND thats unsprung weight so you won't alter suspension geometry and most importantly its rotational mass. lighter wheels are easier to spin.kmckis1029 wrote:
once i finish with engine upgrades ima get lighter rims... should be about 15lbs less a rim... so 60lbs and 30lbs... thats almost 100lbs less with no cabin stripping...
you getting the titanium one that weighs like 4lbs? if so you a balla!!kmckis1029 wrote:then add a lighter exhaust and i'll be over 100lbs lighter...
Thanks for the history lesson. I still want one. I was referring to the older generation Evos for the sum 3k lbs weight. Wikipedia showed the first gen weighing in under 2800lbs.ldstang50 wrote:I was one of the first Evo owners in the country buying an 03 in early Sept. The curb weight of that car was about 3200lbs
In 04, Mitsu came out with the Evo RS, it was a 'stripper' Evo with no power windows, locks, no rear wiper, no HIDs, no intercooler sprayer, optional AC and diffs all the way around. This was called the jungle package. You can only get it in red or white. You can tell an RS because the door handles and mirrors will be black. This car weighed about 3100lbsIn 05 Mitsu added the MR which came with the aluminum roof, lighter bbs wheels, 6spd, ACD and LSD, Bilsteins, a larger turbo and more power. The 05 turbo uses a 10.5 However even with the lighter roof, wheels and suspension, the MR with out leather weighed the same as the GSR (regular model) because the 6pd transmission was heavier. In 05 the curb weight of an Evo was just north of 3300lbs. The 05 RS had the aluminum roof but regular suspension and wheels and 5spd so it was the lightest of the bunch, but the suspension was designed for the car with the steel roof not aluminum, so it didn't match up well with the RS, even though it was about 50lbs lighter than the GSR and MR.In 06, the Evo became the IX and was fitted with an even slightly larger turbo and electonically controlled adjustable cam gear on the exhaust side. As far as weight, I'm not completely sure, but I know it wasn't over 3500lbs.Now the new Evo X weighs over 3500lbs, but it also has as many gadgets and gizmos as a fighter jet
Check out my weight reduction index in the Mod Database. I think all of the trunk stuff weighed about 50lbs (spare, jack, carpet, plastic moulding).kmckis1029 wrote:i wanted to get rid of my full sized spare tire to drop about 30lbs.. but the trunk liner in my G is so thin as it just sits on the spare for support... ima have to get a thicker aftermarket trunk liner...
once i finish with engine upgrades ima get lighter rims... should be about 15lbs less a rim... so 60lbs and 30lbs... thats almost 100lbs less with no cabin stripping... then add a lighter exhaust and i'll be over 100lbs lighter...
I didn't mean to come off as a d!ck or know it all, but my Evo used to be my baby so I am (or was) up to date with them.Evo III's are my fav, soon followed by the Tommy Makinnen edition Evo VI'sSentientbydesign wrote:
Thanks for the history lesson. I still want one. I was referring to the older generation Evos for the sum 3k lbs weight. Wikipedia showed the first gen weighing in under 2800lbs.
Unlikely. The weight of the OE tire size for the 17 inch wheels are around 27 lbs by themselves depending on which tire you look at. You might be able to save a couple of lbs here at most. The wheels could save some more, but even a 10 lbs savings would be a lot in a 17 inch size. The G35 is a heavier car so make sure the sheel you get will handle it. Jumping on the lightest wheel you can find may not be the smartest thing to do. Wheels do flex under load. Too much distortion could affect how the tire interacts with the road.kmckis1029 wrote:i want just another set of 17s... maybe(big maybe) 18 inch alluminum rims... i want lighter more than style... but yeah they will be less durable... i read the rim and tire is like 27lbs... i want to drop by 10-15lbs on each tire...
I meant my comment sincerely. It's nice talking to someone who really knows their cars and how it's "evolved"ldstang50 wrote:I didn't mean to come off as a d!ck or know it all, but my Evo used to be my baby so I am (or was) up to date with them.Evo III's are my fav, soon followed by the Tommy Makinnen edition Evo VI's
I agree with most of that, but I will say I've seen upwards of a 5lb weight difference between comparably sized tires. 20lbs of rotating weight isn't too shabby considering it's distance from the torque arm is longer than the rim itself.C-Kwik wrote:
Unlikely. The weight of the OE tire size for the 17 inch wheels are around 27 lbs by themselves depending on which tire you look at. You might be able to save a couple of lbs here at most. The wheels could save some more, but even a 10 lbs savings would be a lot in a 17 inch size. The G35 is a heavier car so make sure the sheel you get will handle it. Jumping on the lightest wheel you can find may not be the smartest thing to do. Wheels do flex under load. Too much distortion could affect how the tire interacts with the road.
That said, to realize gains by saving weight in the wheels and tires is easier than with reducing sprung mass. The force required to accelerate your car in a straight line is pretty straight forward. But with wheels, you not only accelerate them in the forward direction. But you also have to provide them with rotational acceleration which requires additional force. So reducing the weight of your wheels and tires not only reduces the total mass to be accelerated in the direction of travel, but it also reduces the mass that has to be rotationally accelerated. So pound for pound, reducing weight in the wheels and tires are more effective than reducing mass elsewhere in terms of acceleration. Obviously, the more you can save in weight there, the better, but you're not going to find much savings in tires and you don't want to compromise strength in the wheels to save a few pounds.
Yeah, the moment of mass around the axis of rotation is actually what matters, but unless someone wants specific knowledge about it, I'd say leave it out of the equation. It could end up being a hugely complicated discussion. Not that it would deter me. Perhaps a simple way to put it though is to say that pound for pound, removing mass from the wheels and tires is better than removing it ffrom the rest of the car. And removing weight from the tires is better than removing it from the wheels. But a small disclaimer is that some tires are heavier to provide a more rigid structure. This can make a difference at the handling limits.Sentientbydesign wrote:I agree with most of that, but I will say I've seen upwards of a 5lb weight difference between comparably sized tires. 20lbs of rotating weight isn't too shabby considering it's distance from the torque arm is longer than the rim itself..
I recall years ago at SEMA, a friend of mine who worked for Volk at the time threw one of their magnesium wheels to me as I was walking up to the booth. I nearly freaked out until I caught it. I can't recall what he said the weight was, but it was super light. I believe it was only 15" though. Either way, it was pretty easy to hold balanced on one finger. They bend pretty easy (from impacts) though is what he told me. Pretty much a track only wheel.Sentientbydesign wrote:For wheels, I'd say look into forged 17s for maximum weight savings. Magnesium is also an option, but is very pricey.