limitations of the KA

Information on the naturally-aspirated KA24E and KA24DE engines.
raging panda
Posts: 328
Joined: Sun Jan 05, 2003 8:45 pm
Car: s13 coupe
Contact:

Post

So everyone says that its really hard to get significant power out of the KA naturally aspirated. I want to know why. Is it because of its larger stroke over bore? Is it because there is less of an aftermarket to support increasing the power? It's just that I see little Honda engines starting with less power and ending up making somewhere in the neighborhood of 200hp sometimes and I wonder why I can't do that with my wonderful piece of Nissan technology. Someone enlighten me.


Rownan
Posts: 150
Joined: Mon Sep 09, 2002 5:38 am

Post

Yes it is partly due to the long stroke of the KA and the unwillingness of it to rev high. Honda engines make so much power because they make it at 8000 rpms. But they sacrifice torque, which is where the KA shines. They make nice amounts of horsepower in NA form but even when modded they have less torque then we do from the factory.. It is a trade off, and in a naturally aspirated 4 cylinder engine, it is difficult to have both.

There are things you can do to make that kind of power in a KA without turbo, but it requires work(IE more than just bolt-ons!)

Timhttp://www.projectaspec.com

User avatar
I am Technoman
Posts: 979
Joined: Fri Nov 22, 2002 6:49 am
Car: ???

Post

I’m convinced the KA can’t get over 200RWHP because of the intake plenum and sock throttle body. In order for the motor to make that much power it needs inhale way more air than the intake system and runners can handle. It also needs to rev higher. With a good set of throttle bodies (48 mill) and “tuned high lift cams” I could see a KA making over 200RWHP. This mod would cost as much as a turbo application. But only net you maybe 220 RWHP.

Rownan
Posts: 150
Joined: Mon Sep 09, 2002 5:38 am

Post

Yeah my dream is to make a custom intake manifold for my NA KA... It would be such an interesting project, but at the moment, my research is coming to the conclusion that it make not be worth my while...

96_S14_SE
Posts: 973
Joined: Wed Nov 06, 2002 11:10 am
Car: 96 S14 SE - 05 VW GTI 1.8t - 89 S13 coupe "gold on brown"

Post

Why not? I plan to make my own hopefully soonish using the stock runners lobed off about 6-8" from the head. Hone the insde of them, and am toying with the idea of adding velocity stacks welded to them and the SM plenum. The plenum will possibly be 4" od 3.5" id aluminum, but Im not 100% on that.

With out the velocity stacks it could be made dirt cheap, even with buying a used upper runner portion / aluminum stock (I got a quote of 36$ for the 4" od peice Ill need) / new used tb (was going for a vh45 one but dont think I will anymore, even though I can get one now)....

With out the stacks I could fab one up for the sub 100 range easy, by going this route. I havent been able to find raw stacks retail though so who knows...

It may or may not turn out to be optimal on the first go (probably wont) but once you get the idea started, modding it shouldnt be too hard. Time consuming, yeah but that goes with any prototype part :)

One day Ill fab one out though and if it flops... Oh well, as it wont be the first time a coustom project failed, nor will it be all that expensive of a failure.

Aries
Posts: 2404
Joined: Tue Aug 27, 2002 6:23 am
Car: LT1 240SS
Contact:

Post

Rownan wrote:Yeah my dream is to make a custom intake manifold for my NA KA... It would be such an interesting project, but at the moment, my research is coming to the conclusion that it make not be worth my while...
Not worth your time when it has already been done.I'll post dyno numbers in a little while.

raging panda
Posts: 328
Joined: Sun Jan 05, 2003 8:45 pm
Car: s13 coupe
Contact:

Post

Why was it that it wasn't worth the time? Wouldn't the shorter intake runners make quite a difference at least somehow in throttle response or something, even if it didn't make tons of power? I know that you know better than I do but I'm really kind of shocked by that. I was thinking about making one of those rectangle looking plenums with straight runners and a bigger throttle body and a Z32 maf. I think that would make a big difference in the air intake.

User avatar
SSS
Posts: 335
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 1:45 pm

Post

You can't go too short with the runners, otherwise you lose out with torque in the low to mid range.

Rownan
Posts: 150
Joined: Mon Sep 09, 2002 5:38 am

Post

raging panda wrote:Why was it that it wasn't worth the time? Wouldn't the shorter intake runners make quite a difference at least somehow in throttle response or something, even if it didn't make tons of power? I know that you know better than I do but I'm really kind of shocked by that. I was thinking about making one of those rectangle looking plenums with straight runners and a bigger throttle body and a Z32 maf. I think that would make a big difference in the air intake.


I simply say "not worth the time" because I probably would have a hell of a time fabricating something like that. I do not doubt the performance gain at all.


Return to “KA24E / KA24DE Forum”