Post by
bcar240 »
https://forums.nicoclub.com/bcar240-u13477.html
Sun Nov 28, 2004 7:02 pm
seems like you got a crappy deal here. I know exactly what you mean in those situations where everyone is going faster and your just keeping up, but technically (trust me, I know ) it is no legal excuse. Also, accusing the officer of bias (just in case you were thinking of it) because he pulled over your sporty car instead of a minivan is not typically a good idea and may make the judge mad (because you have no way to prove it.) However, if the officer caught you on radar/ladar and was on a hill you might have a little fighting room. There is a phenomon called cosine error, that is when the path of the radar beam is at large angle to the path of the car the reading is not very accurate. Also, there are a few problems with using radar on hills. Example: .This is more of a problem for radar units mounted to the patrol car than hand-held, but adding another dimension to the cop's job will do nothing but make the results less accurate. As for trying to dismiss the ticket because of the fee mistake, it might be kind of a long shot, the officer may simply claim he wrote the wrong digit and meant to put a 2 instead of a 5. A lawyer would definatly help, especially if you are on the verge of losing your liscense. The cost will probably be offset by the insurance jump you might NOT see, afterward. Lawyers also tend to know may local loopholes and occasionally personally know the judge or prosecutor and can cut deals. From what I hear about traffic court, bringing up small details usually doesn't do much good unless you can prove the officer was being careless and thus can't be trusted to have positively got all the important stuff right, like stopping the right car (the officer or judge can change the ticket in court, so a few mistakes might just be corrected instead of resulting in a dismissal.)