LE37T on a Black 05 Q45

A Q45 forum / Cima forum for the President of Infiniti's lineup. Brought to you by Infiniti Parts USA, your OEM source for Q45 parts!
PIONEER
Posts: 67
Joined: Fri Nov 28, 2003 4:26 am

Post

I sold my 20" that I had on my black 02. There are pictures of them floating around on the forums. Axis Mod7 20x9 20x10.

I have a set of Volk LE37T's now in 19x8.5 and 9.5 but after getting the wheels, I'm wondering if they would look allright on the Q. Too sporty for the car maybe? Maybe some Wald or Lexion wheels? Anyone know the Weight on the Wald D23 in 19" stagger setup?


maxnix
Posts: 22627
Joined: Mon Jul 22, 2002 8:11 pm
Car: 1995 Infiniti Q45
1995 Infiniti Q45t
2000 Infiniti Q45

Post

F**k the looks, the Rays are forged, strong and light.

But maybe too large a diameter to mount the correct tires at that width?

Stagger is for cosmetics only, not performance nor longgevity, with stock power output. If your engine is putting out 400HP, then stagger will have benefits in putting the most rubber back there. Otherwise, without adjustments to the suspension, it will only encourage understeer.

PIONEER
Posts: 67
Joined: Fri Nov 28, 2003 4:26 am

Post

You may have a point but I don't like the shopping car look of non stagger wheels. The stagger setup in the rear fills up the hole a little better.

Can't really take the corner hard in the Q. Take a exit fast in a Q and you'll find out quick who's incharge. Slip light, ABS, traction control the whole car takes ownership in a hurry.

User avatar
Falkdesigns
Posts: 2738
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2004 9:58 am
Car: 1998 Q45t ~ EXE
Contact:

Post

I bone out big time in corners in my Q, not sure about other people. I take my Q on canyon runs, I drive it fast on Mullholland, Sunset, etc, I love going fast in my Q.

F##k looks? F##k that. Looks = Performance = Useability in my book, and yes, you can have a combination of all three, it's not just one or the other.

maxnix
Posts: 22627
Joined: Mon Jul 22, 2002 8:11 pm
Car: 1995 Infiniti Q45
1995 Infiniti Q45t
2000 Infiniti Q45

Post

PIONEER wrote:You may have a point but I don't like the shopping car look of non stagger wheels. The stagger setup in the rear fills up the hole a little better.

Can't really take the corner hard in the Q. Take a exit fast in a Q and you'll find out quick who's incharge. Slip light, ABS, traction control the whole car takes ownership in a hurry.
All the more reason to avoid stagger if you can't turn that stuff off. Thank you G50 and FY33.

Read Q45tech's posts, and think about dynamic weight distribution. Skinnier tires with a lower load rating will develop understeer more quickly without major spring rate, rollbar, mountings alterations. The whole key to good handling in a stock powered Q45 is the front tire load capacity and tire strength. This is where the liimiting G forces are greatest.

TgduMg
Posts: 457
Joined: Thu Jun 12, 2003 12:15 pm
Car: 94 Q45, 02 Maxima SE
Contact:

Post

Do you remember what the offsets were on the Axis Mod sevens and what are the offsets on the Volk's?

Danisiti 1

PIONEER
Posts: 67
Joined: Fri Nov 28, 2003 4:26 am

Post

TgduMg wrote:Do you remember what the offsets were on the Axis Mod sevens and what are the offsets on the Volk's?

Danisiti 1
The Axis are 38 front and 37 rear.

The Volks are 29 front 34 rear

Falkdesigns:- If I take hard corners in my Q, the car will bring itself to a stop and tell me to get out

User avatar
HashiriyaS14
Posts: 14298
Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2003 8:02 pm
Car: '95 Nissan 240SX
'08 Honda Accord
'08 Honda NPS50
'03 Kawasaki Ninja 250
'60 Honda Super Cub
Location: DC Metro Area
Contact:

Post

If you've already got them, I say go ahead and put them on the car.

I'd honestly like to see what some Work Meister S1 3pc (Or SSR Prof, but I like the Works more) would look like on an F50.....but you already bought the Volks, so go ahead and put them on the car.

User avatar
AZhitman
Administrator
Posts: 54542
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2002 2:04 am
Car: 58 L210, 63 Bluebird RHD, 64 NL320, 65 SPL310, 66 411 RHD, 67 WRL411, 68 510 SR20, 75 280Z RB25, 77 620 SR20, 79 B310, 90 Z32, 91 GTi-R, 92 Silvia Qs, 98 S14, 23 Z.
Location: Surprise, Arizona
Contact:

Post

hi Pioneer!

I bought your Axis Mods for my G.

I think those 19's will look great and perform just fine.

NOTE: Do NOT skimp on tires (either size or quality). The Q seems to like a wider tire than what TireRack or any of the "lawyer-bound" sources will suggest.

Of course, you knew that already, judging by the steamrollers that just showed up at my house today!

I currently have 255/40/18 P-Zeros on a set of 2004 Premium Q chrome 18" wheels on my 95 Q45t, and am considering going even wider (to gain a little more sidewall and loadrating).


User avatar
nismofly
Posts: 12505
Joined: Sat Sep 04, 2004 3:16 pm
Car: 89 Nissan 240SX Hatch

Post

i dont know how you could say LE37's are "not for looks," but theyll be fine if you ask me...look at the people running 350 track wheels, looks awesome
Falkdesigns wrote:Looks = Performance = Useability in my book, and yes, you can have a combination of all three, it's not just one or the other.
takes a ton of money to get to the point where this becomes true though, having 100% on all fronts...for example, this car looks amazing and performs just as well, but cost about $15 million to build:



youre more of a "compromise" person

User avatar
Falkdesigns
Posts: 2738
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2004 9:58 am
Car: 1998 Q45t ~ EXE
Contact:

Post

I didn't say the LE-37's are not for looks, I love those wheels, but I wouldn't run them on a Q. Maxnix said f##k looks, and IMO, you can have looks, you can have performance, and you can have functional useability. I believe that's what I have with my Q: it looks good, it performs good and it works good in a real world day to day basis. Personally, I don't think the track wheels look that good on Q's, but that's just me.

User avatar
nismofly
Posts: 12505
Joined: Sat Sep 04, 2004 3:16 pm
Car: 89 Nissan 240SX Hatch

Post

Falkdesigns wrote:I didn't say the LE-37's are not for looks, I love those wheels, but I wouldn't run them on a Q. Maxnix said f##k looks, and IMO, you can have looks, you can have performance, and you can have functional useability. I believe that's what I have with my Q: it looks good, it performs good and it works good in a real world day to day basis. Personally, I don't think the track wheels look that good on Q's, but that's just me.
true, like i said, youre a compromise person, you value looks more than performance, but still care about performance

theres people who value the performance part, but still care about looks, these are your people who actually mod and drive corvettes, vipers, porsches, m3's, and several cars out of japan

to a lesser extent thats what i am, and theres plenty of 240 owners who care more about looks than me, but still value performance just the same

then theres people who care about nothing but performance, these are where your 500 awhp 4g63 suzuki swifts and those v8 or twin engine focuses come from

then theres the people who own cars for the sole purpose of enlarging their genitalia, these are the vast majority of exotic and luxury drivers

User avatar
Falkdesigns
Posts: 2738
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2004 9:58 am
Car: 1998 Q45t ~ EXE
Contact:

Post

I don't consider myself a compromise person. I don't value looks more than performance, I value them equally. I know what you're saying though.

PIONEER
Posts: 67
Joined: Fri Nov 28, 2003 4:26 am

Post

AZhitman wrote:hi Pioneer!

I bought your Axis Mods for my G.

I think those 19's will look great and perform just fine.

NOTE: Do NOT skimp on tires (either size or quality). The Q seems to like a wider tire than what TireRack or any of the "lawyer-bound" sources will suggest.

Of course, you knew that already, judging by the steamrollers that just showed up at my house today!

I currently have 255/40/18 P-Zeros on a set of 2004 Premium Q chrome 18" wheels on my 95 Q45t, and am considering going even wider (to gain a little more sidewall and loadrating).
Hey Greg, I hope you enjoy the wheels. was the packing intact or was it all tore up by the time it got to you.

I'm looking into the tire option for the LE37T if that is the route I end up taking. I'm thinking S03 or PS2. RE050 is another option. I want some quiet tires. No rubber slapping the road action.

maxnix
Posts: 22627
Joined: Mon Jul 22, 2002 8:11 pm
Car: 1995 Infiniti Q45
1995 Infiniti Q45t
2000 Infiniti Q45

Post

Fashion vs. Function
nismofly wrote:...for example, this car looks amazing and performs just as well, but cost about $15 million to build:
Won't fly in the ghetto. No lip on the rimz.

User avatar
Falkdesigns
Posts: 2738
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2004 9:58 am
Car: 1998 Q45t ~ EXE
Contact:

Post

100% function, and a nice deep lip for the ghettos they race them in, you know, ghettos like Monaco


User avatar
nismofly
Posts: 12505
Joined: Sat Sep 04, 2004 3:16 pm
Car: 89 Nissan 240SX Hatch

Post

and to think, theyre only $16,000 a set

maxnix
Posts: 22627
Joined: Mon Jul 22, 2002 8:11 pm
Car: 1995 Infiniti Q45
1995 Infiniti Q45t
2000 Infiniti Q45

Post

And 15" wide! I would say $16K as set is cheap as they are probably forged magnesium.

Of course the lack of lights, a horn and fenders might get you in a little trouble with the gendarmes along the Autoroute, non?

User avatar
nismofly
Posts: 12505
Joined: Sat Sep 04, 2004 3:16 pm
Car: 89 Nissan 240SX Hatch

Post

yep, they weigh 2.6 lbs for the fronts, 3.1 for the rears

they do have tail lights, just no head lights

and personally i think a 21,000 rpm 2.4L V8 is good for a horn, if youve never heard those cars before youre missing out, loudest cars you will *ever* hear, that includes top fuel dragsters

User avatar
Falkdesigns
Posts: 2738
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2004 9:58 am
Car: 1998 Q45t ~ EXE
Contact:

Post

maxnix wrote:...trouble with the gendarmes along the Autoroute, non?
zen zen wakarimasen.

They are without a doubt the loudest cars you'll ever here, simply amazing sounds, I went to an F1 race in 1995 when the Ferraris still had the V12s, that was such sweet music. Top Fuel is loud as hell, but it's only 4.25 seconds and then it's quite again.

User avatar
AZhitman
Administrator
Posts: 54542
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2002 2:04 am
Car: 58 L210, 63 Bluebird RHD, 64 NL320, 65 SPL310, 66 411 RHD, 67 WRL411, 68 510 SR20, 75 280Z RB25, 77 620 SR20, 79 B310, 90 Z32, 91 GTi-R, 92 Silvia Qs, 98 S14, 23 Z.
Location: Surprise, Arizona
Contact:

Post

PIONEER wrote:Hey Greg, I hope you enjoy the wheels. was the packing intact or was it all tore up by the time it got to you.
Packing was great. Held up real well.

Unfortunately, one of the center caps came off in transit and rattled around behind the cardboard and demolished the finish on the face and lip of one of the wheels (scratches, chips, ugh...)

I'm gonna look into having the centers powdercoated charcoal grey, but so far no shop in town will touch them (because of the masking and rivets).

3Q Jay
Posts: 2560
Joined: Sat May 08, 2004 6:23 pm
Car: 94 Q45a
95 Q45a (sold)
97 Q45t (sold)
01 B15 Sentra (Daughter's)
Also Mine...
2010 A6 Avant
1977 F-150 (460!)
Location: Florida Coast

Post

AZhitman wrote:I currently have 255/40/18 P-Zeros on a set of 2004 Premium Q chrome 18" wheels on my 95 Q45t, and am considering going even wider (to gain a little more sidewall and loadrating).
so, at the risk of starting a war here.... a 255 on 7.5" (i think the f50 is 7.5!??) would pinch--no? i'm not a lawyer nor tire rack, just wanna know if this is really viable. i'm picking up 8X18 FX rims, and would like the option of a 255/40.......

User avatar
AZhitman
Administrator
Posts: 54542
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2002 2:04 am
Car: 58 L210, 63 Bluebird RHD, 64 NL320, 65 SPL310, 66 411 RHD, 67 WRL411, 68 510 SR20, 75 280Z RB25, 77 620 SR20, 79 B310, 90 Z32, 91 GTi-R, 92 Silvia Qs, 98 S14, 23 Z.
Location: Surprise, Arizona
Contact:

Post

Well, if you're getting 18x8's, what difference does it make?

255/40/18 will be a sweet fitment on those new wheels.

Although, I'd see no problem with them on a 7.5" wheel. Like I said before, I had 255/50/16's on 16x7's and everyone raved about them.

maxnix
Posts: 22627
Joined: Mon Jul 22, 2002 8:11 pm
Car: 1995 Infiniti Q45
1995 Infiniti Q45t
2000 Infiniti Q45

Post

Falkdesigns wrote:They are without a doubt the loudest cars you'll ever here, simply amazing sounds, I went to an F1 race in 1995 when the Ferraris still had the V12s, that was such sweet music. Top Fuel is loud as hell, but it's only 4.25 seconds and then it's quite again.
Nothing like the wail of a V12. Even the V10 were not too bad, but not the same harmonics either.

I think they ought to go back to the early to mid sixties formula where the engines were 1.5L and there were no ground effects. Now they are just using ¾ of the horsepower to push around air plows.

User avatar
97Q45t
Posts: 511
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 4:54 pm
Car: Viper RT/10, Ford Explorer 4WD
Contact:

Post

I think the LE-37's will look nice on a dark color car. Here's a pic of my friend's old M45 with the LE-37. Any chance the wheels you bought was from Houston?


User avatar
AZhitman
Administrator
Posts: 54542
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2002 2:04 am
Car: 58 L210, 63 Bluebird RHD, 64 NL320, 65 SPL310, 66 411 RHD, 67 WRL411, 68 510 SR20, 75 280Z RB25, 77 620 SR20, 79 B310, 90 Z32, 91 GTi-R, 92 Silvia Qs, 98 S14, 23 Z.
Location: Surprise, Arizona
Contact:

Post

^ *sigh*....

Sexy. Damn sexy.

PIONEER
Posts: 67
Joined: Fri Nov 28, 2003 4:26 am

Post

AZhitman wrote:^ *sigh*....

Sexy. Damn sexy.
Greg, check your PM on my350z.

User avatar
Jesda
Posts: 39644
Joined: Mon May 05, 2003 1:50 pm
Location: STL, DTW
Contact:

Post

97Q45t wrote:I think the LE-37's will look nice on a dark color car. Here's a pic of my friend's old M45 with the LE-37. Any chance the wheels you bought was from Houston?
You owe me new pants.

User avatar
Jeff Williams
Posts: 3394
Joined: Fri Aug 02, 2002 4:17 am
Car: 1994 Infiniti Q45t
2000 Infiniti I30t
2004 Infiniti M45
71, 72, 73, 82 & 2000 Corvettes
Contact:

Post

Do this, Divide the tire size number (255) by 25.4, and you will get "Tread Width" In this case, the tread width is about 10"

Now, look at your rim width (7") and multiply by 25.4. In this case, you get about 177.8.

This gives you the difference in width (77.2 MM, or about 3")

Now divide that by 2 (because the tire will fit evenly on the rim, and stick out the same on both sides. This leaves the tire sticking beyond the rim about 1.5".

If you have a 40 series tire, then the sidewall will be about 40% of the width, or 102 MM, which translates to about 4".

Using basic geomerty, you have a triangle with the base 4" and the height 1". Using a right angle for the equation, give you a bead angle of 20.73 degrees.

Math is fun!

http://www.1728.com/pythgorn.htm

I am running 275 MM tires, with a 35% sidewall on a 9" rim. What is the bead angle? I came up with 13.55 degrees.

I like my bead angle much better than Greg's. (Not that his was bad or anything).

I don't think I could go much wider in the rear, with the 45 MM offset. The tire is a finger width (about 20 MM)away from the strut/spring. If I went with a 295 rear tire, I would need about a 40 MM rear offset wheel.

User avatar
elwesso
Posts: 30810
Joined: Sun Feb 23, 2003 4:52 pm
Car: 94 Infiniti Q45t 5 spd
2007 BMW M Coupe
2007 Infiniti G35 S 6MT
Location: Indiana
Contact:

Post

Jeff Williams wrote:
I don't think I could go much wider in the rear, with the 45 MM offset. The tire is a finger width (about 20 MM)away from the strut/spring. If I went with a 295 rear tire, I would need about a 40 MM rear offset wheel.
and youd probably be rubbing on the fender.


Return to “Q45 Forum / Cima Forum”