Post by
IBCoupe »
https://forums.nicoclub.com/ibcoupe-u134097.html
Wed Nov 17, 2010 7:12 am
During the Juan Williams/Keith Olbermann debates over the course of the past few weeks, there's been a quiet argument that's slowly been rising. It recently came to a head when Ted Koppel called out Keith Olbermann, Bill O'Reilly, and the rest of the opinion-broadcasting industry for maintaining a lack of objectivity, and, basically, the causing death of real journalism.
Argues Koppel, the drive for profits in "news" organizations like MSNBC and FOXNews has led to the downfall of quality journalism. The major news stations have eliminated their foreign bureaus (often keeping a bureau in London and flying a journalism for a day or two to make a story elsewhere instead of maintaining news forces in foreign countries, which speak the language, know the personalities, etc.), and they have substituted the presentation of facts for opinions laced with occasional facts. This, he argues, does a disservice to the audience, by failing to provide them with the tools they need to come to their own educated opinions.
Keith Olbermann, in his response, has argued that he was denouncing the Iraq invasion at the time, and that Ted Koppel's objectivity failed to see the errors. He also points to Murrow and Kronkite's famous opinions about McCarthy and Nixon (Koppel responded in an NPR interview that the power of those opinions was that they were so out of character - Murrow and Kronkite never gave their personal opinions prior to those incidents).
What are your thoughts on the matter?