I know. And he did stick rags into the runners, but it was after he removed all of the bolts and lifted everything off. The bolt dropped while he was removing the rear section of the plenum. I was standing right there when it happened. To me, it would make sense to stick a rag in them after each bolts are removed, but I wasn't about to tell him how to do his job and figured he knew what he was doing. But I was definitely worried that it fell in there.BCC93QT wrote:A "specialist" would have the experience and knowledge of covering up the exposed intake runners to avoid dropping anything in.
He admitted it. He was upset about it. He even tried to look inside the runners to see if he could find the bolt but couldn't find it. He then assumed that it fell down somewhere else. But it obviously didn't. It was a careless mistake on his part. I know it wasn't intentional, but it is what it is.BCC93QT wrote: Did he at least admit to his mistake or did you find it out yourself?
Oh trust me, I'm not worried if this goes to court. In fact, your comments are making me really annoyed cuz the suggestion in your tone is that this is somehow MY fault?qship96 wrote:Based on your response,looks like I am correct......you were NOT a customer of any dealership,you were paying an INDIVIDUAL,under the table,to work on your car who just happened to use the dealerships space to perform the work......at a much reduced price than had you of gone through the dealership like a normal customer does and pay the higher labor rates the dealer charges,some of which no doubt,goes to them paying for liability insurance in case things like this come up.......YOU made the decision upfront to bypass going to a licensed,insured shop to perform the work and decided to have the work done "off the books"- you took a risk,and sadly,it didnt workout in your favor.....but it was YOUR choice to do so-even if you spent the $$$$ and took it to court,your chances of winning are very small-any judge is going to point out what I just outlined,and take in to consideration the cars age and miles and throw out the case- sad but true.Hopefully if anything,you learn that trying to save a few bucks on a job by not using a licensed insured shop can come back to bite you.
BCC93QT wrote:Was this a documented business transaction with any sort of paperwork? Was there any sort of guarantee or warranty on any work? I don't know ALL the facts but I think qship MAY be rightYou're at a loss on this one.
Your confusing having insurance protection with liability. Him not having insurance does not mean he is not liable for the situation. If I drove my car without insurance and crashed into someone, would I not still be liable for the damages? Of course I would. Again, I'm not going into specific details and I'm still trying to settle this situation amicably, so that it doesn't escalate into something else. But he is liable for the damages to my car and that is all.qship96 wrote:The difference is the surgeon carries millions of dollars worth of liability{malpractice} insurance,which he pays well over six figures for each year { I come from a family of MDs}
The dealership also pays a hefty insurance premium which covers them and THEIR customers,which is one of the reasons their labor rates are what they are........the individual,working on your car ,has no personal insurance to cover himself when moonlighting.I am not saying its your fault,but sadly,it is your problem.
Qship and I stated the exact same thing, separately, for a reason: our responses are fact. My friend, your interpretation of liabilty in this situation is not entirely accurate. Though he may be a mechanic, HE is liable for his mistake, NOT the dealership...so yes, in moral law, you are correct. He is liable (if he told you he could do the job WITHOUT ruining the engine). So, he does it of his own volition, or a court forces him to. End of story. Apparently you are going to court and spending months and more than the car is worth to resolve this, since he is not responding to you affirmatively. However, you're learning a valuable life lesson here, if you allow yourself to think more logically. Sometimes life gets in the way of life. Personal liability vs. business liability are entirely different things, and nothing is free in this world. As the owner of two small business and someone that spends $5,000/year in liability insurance, I can tell you BUSINESS OWNERS HAVE INSURANCE TO PAY FOR THINGS LIKE THIS. Individuals do not. So this was done legit, or not. Only you and he know that.Q45Owner wrote:Oh trust me, I'm not worried if this goes to court. In fact, your comments are making me really annoyed cuz the suggestion in your tone is that this is somehow MY fault?qship96 wrote:Based on your response,looks like I am correct......you were NOT a customer of any dealership,you were paying an INDIVIDUAL,under the table,to work on your car who just happened to use the dealerships space to perform the work......at a much reduced price than had you of gone through the dealership like a normal customer does and pay the higher labor rates the dealer charges,some of which no doubt,goes to them paying for liability insurance in case things like this come up.......YOU made the decision upfront to bypass going to a licensed,insured shop to perform the work and decided to have the work done "off the books"- you took a risk,and sadly,it didnt workout in your favor.....but it was YOUR choice to do so-even if you spent the $$$$ and took it to court,your chances of winning are very small-any judge is going to point out what I just outlined,and take in to consideration the cars age and miles and throw out the case- sad but true.Hopefully if anything,you learn that trying to save a few bucks on a job by not using a licensed insured shop can come back to bite you.You do not know all the details of the situation and I will just leave it at that for now. But rest assured, the work was done, by a mechanic, in a licensed insured shop. I REALLY don't think this person wants this situation to go this way, but like I said in my previous post, I will do whatever I need to do to recover any of my financial losses. This person is a mechanic and he took on the job as a mechanic. If a surgeon takes on the job to perform surgery and something goes wrong, it is the responsibility of the surgeon, NOT the patient. If this mechanic felt he was not qualified to do the work requested, then he could have easily declined to do the job. But the responsibility does not lay with me, it lays with him. So get that straight.
You know why there hasn't been any updates. Unless he picks up another Q45 I seriously doubt we will see him againqship96 wrote:Any updates to the outcome of this ordeal?
Wrong. This has turned into a legal matter, so no updates until that is settled.BCC93QT wrote:You know why there hasn't been any updates. Unless he picks up another Q45 I seriously doubt we will see him againqship96 wrote:Any updates to the outcome of this ordeal?
Well, I couldn't really bring myself to replace my '94 with another G50. My car was in mint condition in and out and to try and find another 94 in the same or better condition would have been too difficult and time consuming and honestly, I just couldn't see myself in another oneparanoidjack wrote:Glad to hear you got another Q. What kind?
All did NOT go well. I was driving my Y33 to a party Saturday night. Smelled gas, got to the next light, stopped. Seen smoke. Pulled over, seen flames. Cut off engine, got out, called 911. Fire dept had to come and extinguish the flames! I believe the shop damaged the fuel rail (fuel line) and over the next few hours of random driving it got worse and worse.HollywoodJackson wrote:... replacing my knock sensors right now. Hope it goes well!
