King Obama: House Considers Repealing 22nd Amendment

A place for intelligent and well-thought-out discussion involving politics and associated topics. No nonsense will be tolerated at all.
User avatar
leesredgt
Posts: 3945
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2007 11:18 am
Car: 1992 Toyota MR2 N/A
1991 Toyota MR2 Turbo

Post

Earlier this month, Rep. Jose Serrano, D-N.Y. introduced H. J. Res. 5, a bill that would repeal the Constitution’s 22nd Amendment prohibiting a president from being elected to more than two terms in office, thus potentially paving the way to make Barack Obama president for life. Not surprisingly, the corporate media — currently caught up in Obama mania — has not covered this story.

“Will George W. Bush end up being the last true US President?” asked Sher Zieve, writing for the Canadian Free Press on January 14. “As I warned you on multiple times prior to the 2008 General Election, ‘once Obama is elected, we won’t be able to get rid of him.’ Tragically, this warning is now being realized. Not only has Obama established his election-fraud organization — ACORN — nationwide, his adherents have now begun the process to repeal the US Constitution’s 22nd Amendment.”

http://www.congresscheck.com/2...ment/


User avatar
480sx
Posts: 4085
Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2006 5:27 pm
Car: 1996 Pearl White 240sx

Post

Fat chance of that happening.

User avatar
themadscientist
Posts: 26254
Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2002 3:30 pm
Car: R32 GTR, DR30 RS Turbo, BRZ, Lunchbox, NSR50 Sportster 883 Iron
Location: Staring down at you with disdain from the spooky mountaintop castle.

Post

I thought you were ready for the revolution, now suddenly you think people are going to undumb themselves and stop it. Your faith is amazing. The average American is a mindless drooling pavlovian dog waiting for stimuli delivered by mainstream media in small chunks so their weak underdeveloped cognitave skills can handle the command.

User avatar
smockers83
Posts: 3889
Joined: Sat Oct 28, 2006 12:07 pm
Car: 2006 G35 Coupe

Post

It's not going to happen. Every time a party wins back something, they try to position themselves to keep it that way with stuff like this. It obviously doesn't work too well.

User avatar
OriginalWheelman
Posts: 5668
Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2006 3:38 am
Car: '15 Ford Focus Electric
Location: Portland, OR (or what?)

Post

We're off to a great stop.

User avatar
Jesda
Posts: 39644
Joined: Mon May 05, 2003 1:50 pm
Location: STL, DTW
Contact:

Post

Will never happen.

User avatar
themadscientist
Posts: 26254
Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2002 3:30 pm
Car: R32 GTR, DR30 RS Turbo, BRZ, Lunchbox, NSR50 Sportster 883 Iron
Location: Staring down at you with disdain from the spooky mountaintop castle.

Post

OriginalWheelman wrote:We're off to a great stop.
Freudian slip or intentional? Either way it was funny.

User avatar
marlin29311
Posts: 8342
Joined: Sun May 18, 2008 8:21 pm
Car: 2008 Infiniti G35x

Post

Good luck getting that repealed.

User avatar
OriginalWheelman
Posts: 5668
Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2006 3:38 am
Car: '15 Ford Focus Electric
Location: Portland, OR (or what?)

Post

It was on purpose. Its actually a Rodney Dangerfield quote, to give credit where credit is due.

User avatar
Cold_Zero
Posts: 6714
Joined: Sun Oct 20, 2002 4:15 pm
Car: 2003 Nissan Altima SE 3.5
2005 Nissan Pathfinder

Post

Typically and if you read the 22nd Amendment, when the Amendment is Ratified, it does not apply to the sitting President.
22nd Amendment wrote:But this article shall not apply to any person holding the office of President when this article was proposed by the Congress, and shall not prevent any person who may be holding the office of President, or acting as President, during the term within which this article becomes operative from holding the office of President or acting as President during the remainder of such term.
I guess it would really depend on how it was written, but if the 22nd Amendment is any guide, Obama would be 'Grand Fathered in' under the 22nd Amendment and the new Amendment (repealing the term limit) would apply to the next President.

bud

User avatar
JimmyMethod
Posts: 6450
Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2005 12:18 pm
Car: 97' 240SX SE
Contact:

Post

There was talk of this after Bush Jr. was elected, after Clinton was elected, after Reagen was elect, etc.

User avatar
Cold_Zero
Posts: 6714
Joined: Sun Oct 20, 2002 4:15 pm
Car: 2003 Nissan Altima SE 3.5
2005 Nissan Pathfinder

Post

Jimmy, you do remind me of something.

Where are all the conspiracy theory nuts that claimed that FEMA would declare a state of emergency so that Bush could stop the transfer of power and take over control of the United States?

Did we not just transition power, peacefully, today?

User avatar
OriginalWheelman
Posts: 5668
Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2006 3:38 am
Car: '15 Ford Focus Electric
Location: Portland, OR (or what?)

Post


User avatar
JimmyMethod
Posts: 6450
Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2005 12:18 pm
Car: 97' 240SX SE
Contact:

Post

Cold_Zero wrote:Where are all the conspiracy theory nuts that claimed that FEMA would declare a state of emergency so that Bush could stop the transfer of power and take over control of the United States?
Um... celebrating in the streets? Why are you asking me?

User avatar
Cold_Zero
Posts: 6714
Joined: Sun Oct 20, 2002 4:15 pm
Car: 2003 Nissan Altima SE 3.5
2005 Nissan Pathfinder

Post

Jimmy,Why are you so defensive? I said that you merely reminded me of something that I had forgotten about, with something that you said. It was not a question aimed at you.bud

Cali 2 Balti G
Posts: 866
Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2007 6:36 am
Car: Desert Platinum G35 Coupe
Dodge Ram Quad Cab
Toyota Sequoia

Post

Cold_Zero wrote:Typically and if you read the 22nd Amendment, when the Amendment is Ratified, it does not apply to the sitting President.

I guess it would really depend on how it was written, but if the 22nd Amendment is any guide, Obama would be 'Grand Fathered in' under the 22nd Amendment and the new Amendment (repealing the term limit) would apply to the next President.

bud
i got a different read from the quote - to me it seems like it is speaking about the sitting president AT the time the 22nd amendment was ratified. The "term" mentioned in the legislation refers to the term in which the same legislation was introduced.

All terms after this are bound by the limits expressed in the legislation.

In the end - this only means that Obama would be able to RUN for 3 or more terms. He would still have to campaign and win a third election. The next Republican president and every other president after that would have the same priveledge gained by repeal of the legislation.


User avatar
Jesda
Posts: 39644
Joined: Mon May 05, 2003 1:50 pm
Location: STL, DTW
Contact:

Post

The weather is making Jim irritable. I just finished a month up north, so I empathize.


Return to “Politics Etc.”