Kia has a turbo RWD now, WTF Nissan.

A General Discussion forum for cars and other topics, and a great place to introduce yourself if you are new to NICO!
User avatar
OriginalWheelman
Posts: 5668
Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2006 3:38 am
Car: '15 Ford Focus Electric
Location: Portland, OR (or what?)

Post

312hp, 6 speed, and 4 wheel double wishbones, and a 'tube like chassis'. Seriously Nissan. When Kia beats you to the punch... you have to re-evaluate your position.

Image

I love the proportions, if not necessarily the look of the thing. Of course, they aren't saying if it will go into production or not. If it does, and the price point is good, this thing could be seriously popular. Hyundai / Kia has been making some quality cars the last decade. They have lost a lot of the 'ew' factor from the car community. It seems like unless Nissan gets into the low price RWD game soon, they won't be able to pull any of the market. Try to find a BRZ. Last time I looked, I had to drive 4 hours to find one on a lot, and if I wanted a manual, there were only 3 within a 6 hour radius. I can go down the street and find 3 Zs on a lot.


User avatar
Hijacker
Posts: 14373
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2003 4:57 am
Car: '92 240sx Convertible
'94 F-150
Location: Fredericksburg, VA

Post

I applaud Kia for getting into the RWD market. However, I think the course of action for when Hyundai released the Genesis applies here as well. Wait for the early bugs of an untested platform to be worked out in a year or two and then see where the car stands. I'm still trying to figure when Ghosn and company are going to wake up. I mean, c'mon! It's freaking Kia!

User avatar
2_Liter_Turbo
Posts: 2674
Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2004 10:41 am
Car: _________________
'96 S14 Coupe: SR20VET
'90 R32 TH1 GTR: RB26DETT
'92 S13 Fastback: SR20DET
'11 V36 Sedan: VQ25HR
'06 GMT800 2500HD: LBZ Duramax
Location: DFW, Texas
Contact:

Post

Yeah, it's getting ridiculous now, lol. It couldn't be more obvious that this is what the market is demanding, yet they still keep pushing the Juke as the answer to any budget enthusiast...

User avatar
Bubba1
Moderator
Posts: 16082
Joined: Wed Oct 30, 2002 1:42 pm
Car: 2003 Nissan 350z
2024 Honda HR-V
2008 Toyota Corolla S
2001 Toyota Avalon XLS

Post

Agree. Well done Kia. We can only hope this is a wakeup call to Nissan. If the IDx concept makes production and comes with RWD+ man-pedal there will be hope. We shall see.

User avatar
krash
Posts: 4836
Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2005 10:43 am
Car: 1993 Nissan 240sx Convertible
Location: Memphis, TN
Contact:

Post

Dont forget the IDx! If they smooth out some of the issues with it and fit a proper drivetrain, then Nissan is still in the game.

User avatar
frapjap
Posts: 13175
Joined: Thu Jul 01, 2004 2:46 pm
Car: '99 Pontiac Firebird Trans Am
'07 Subaru Legacy
Location: South Coast Massachusetts

Post

::sigh:: Its time to quit harping up the Nissan tree. They're not going to give us something this cool and that crappy excuse of a performance car, the "not" a 510, doesn't hold a candle to this Kia in looks OR performance. CVT whaaaaaaaaaaaaat?

As for this Kia, its a really honest, original looking car and the only thing I really don't like is the top half. If I cut off the top of the car with my browser at the top of the door it actually looks pretty freakin' sweet. I love the fender haunches, both front and rear. The back end even looks good. I'm a HUGE fan of integrating tailpipes into the bumper (have been since friends were tastefully doing it with their Fox Body Stangs). Its got what looks like a somewhat long wheelbase and nice width. The stance is right. The more I stare at it, the more I really like it. It'd be an awesome convertible. Even the roof isn't awful. I like the super raked rear glass, but I think its the C-pillar that is bothering me- too broad. Honestly, I bet this car is closer to production than they're letting on. There isn't anything that screams "crazy, outlandish difficult to replicate in mass production" in the design. I'd hit it.

Could someone photo shop a different color such as black, blue, or red?

User avatar
WDRacing
Moderator
Posts: 15983
Joined: Mon Nov 25, 2002 2:00 am
Car: 95 240SX, 99 BMW 540i, 01 Chevy Express, 14 Ford Escape
Location: MFFO
Contact:

Post

OriginalWheelman wrote:When Kia beats you to the punch... you have to re-evaluate your position.
The problem is, Nissan is perfectly happy with their position. They don't see the need to evaluate anything. I'm tired of hearing Nissan execs say, "keep an eye on this spot" only to find my eyes glazing over while I stare at nothing but broken promises.

The Nissan I love died in 1998.

User avatar
Jesda
Posts: 39644
Joined: Mon May 05, 2003 1:50 pm
Location: STL, DTW
Contact:

Post

The next Z car will be a 5-passenger crossover with a CVT.

User avatar
sx moneypit
Posts: 8911
Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2009 2:54 am
Car: 2010 Nissan 370Z
1986 Toyota MR2
Location: Memphis,Tn.

Post

Jesda wrote:The next Z car will be a 5-passenger crossover with a CVT.
:eek: :chuckle:

User avatar
krash
Posts: 4836
Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2005 10:43 am
Car: 1993 Nissan 240sx Convertible
Location: Memphis, TN
Contact:

Post

So I guess I'm the only one excited about the IDx? I think it looks freaking sweet aside from the weird C-pillar thing. Obviously not having a manual option will kill it for me, but nothing is really confirmed there IIRC.

Also, I doubt a 312hp rwd coupe is going to fit in the "cheap" category. I'm guessing it will start in the low 30s. 312hp for under 29k would completely dominate the market.

User avatar
AZhitman
Administrator
Posts: 54542
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2002 2:04 am
Car: 58 L210, 63 Bluebird RHD, 64 NL320, 65 SPL310, 66 411 RHD, 67 WRL411, 68 510 SR20, 75 280Z RB25, 77 620 SR20, 79 B310, 90 Z32, 91 GTi-R, 92 Silvia Qs, 98 S14, 23 Z.
Location: Surprise, Arizona
Contact:

Post

Well-done, Kia.

Guess what? Most of us don't even CARE what it looks like anymore, because there just aren't that many options.

It's almost embarrassing, continually having to try and predict where the next 'kick to the junk' is coming from.

User avatar
Bubba1
Moderator
Posts: 16082
Joined: Wed Oct 30, 2002 1:42 pm
Car: 2003 Nissan 350z
2024 Honda HR-V
2008 Toyota Corolla S
2001 Toyota Avalon XLS

Post

krash wrote:So I guess I'm the only one excited about the IDx? I think it looks freaking sweet aside from the weird C-pillar thing. Obviously not having a manual option will kill it for me, but nothing is really confirmed there IIRC.
I think for many of us it's cautious optimism. Unfortunately it is a distinct possibility that the IDx could end up FWD/CVT when it goes into production. And if that's what happens, Nissan will have put the "stink" in distinct.

User avatar
MinisterofDOOM
Moderator
Posts: 30928
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:51 pm
Car: 1962 Corvair Monza
1961 Corvair Lakewood
1974 Unimog 404
1997 Pathfinder XE
2005 Lincoln LS8
Former:
1995 Q45t
1993 Maxima GXE
1995 Ranger XL 2.3
1984 Coupe DeVille
Location: The middle of nowhere.

Post

OriginalWheelman wrote:4 wheel double wishbone
You've got my attention.

User avatar
krash
Posts: 4836
Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2005 10:43 am
Car: 1993 Nissan 240sx Convertible
Location: Memphis, TN
Contact:

Post

Bubba1 wrote:
krash wrote:So I guess I'm the only one excited about the IDx? I think it looks freaking sweet aside from the weird C-pillar thing. Obviously not having a manual option will kill it for me, but nothing is really confirmed there IIRC.
I think for many of us it's cautious optimism. Unfortunately it is a distinct possibility that the IDx could end up FWD/CVT when it goes into production. And if that's what happens, Nissan will have put the "stink" in distinct.
If they for some reason go FWD/CVT, I'll have lost all hope and just live in the 90s when it comes to Nissan.

God the 90s were so freaking awesome for japanese cars.

User avatar
2_Liter_Turbo
Posts: 2674
Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2004 10:41 am
Car: _________________
'96 S14 Coupe: SR20VET
'90 R32 TH1 GTR: RB26DETT
'92 S13 Fastback: SR20DET
'11 V36 Sedan: VQ25HR
'06 GMT800 2500HD: LBZ Duramax
Location: DFW, Texas
Contact:

Post

krash wrote: God the 90s were so freaking awesome for japanese cars.
Which is why the next 10 or so years is going to be so awesome, because we will be able to start legally importing all the cool cars! GTRs, Silvias, Evos, STIs, Type Rs, etc etc etc.

User avatar
float_6969
Moderator
Posts: 17366
Joined: Mon Aug 26, 2002 1:55 pm
Car: CA18DET swapped 1995 Nissan 240sx (too many mods to list)
2015 SV Leaf w/QC & Bose (daily)
Location: Topeka, Kansas
Contact:

Post

I like it. I think it's pretty good looking, and I'd buy it as it sets... in a different color. But I'm still holding out for the IDx. If Nissan does it right, I'll sell the S14 and the CA18 and the wife's Miata and go out and buy one. If it's FWD and doesn't offer a manual, I'm out, and will hang on to the S14

User avatar
Rogue One
Administrator
Posts: 7947
Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2011 10:15 pm
Car: 2011 Nissan Rogue SL
2012 Nissan Rogue SL
2022 Honda Pilot SE
2025 Honda CR-V Sport L
Location: Florida, USA

Post

krash wrote: If they for some reason go FWD/CVT, I'll have lost all hope and just live in the 90s when it comes to Nissan.

God the 90s were so freaking awesome for japanese cars.
"Nissan imagines IDx Freeflow with a 1.2-1.5 gas engine and a CVT." http://jalopnik.com/the-nissan-idx-nism ... 1468159303
Image
Image

User avatar
PapaSmurf2k3
Site Admin
Posts: 19003
Joined: Thu Nov 21, 2002 3:20 pm
Car: 2017 Corvette, 2018 Focus ST, 1993 240sx truck KA Turbo.
Location: Merrimack, NH

Post

Rogue One wrote: "Nissan imagines IDx Freeflow with a 1.2-1.5 gas engine and a CVT."
Yup, and to prove they are serious, the Nismo version gets a 1.6 and a CVT with 6 simulated gears.

JUST WHAT I ALWAYS WANTED!!!

User avatar
krash
Posts: 4836
Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2005 10:43 am
Car: 1993 Nissan 240sx Convertible
Location: Memphis, TN
Contact:

Post

Aren't they specifically talking about the freeflow though? The Nismo is supposed to be fun and sporty. If they straight up dont offer a manual trans with it, that car will SERIOUSLY tank, and then they'll say "see, we were right there is no market for a car like this"

User avatar
PapaSmurf2k3
Site Admin
Posts: 19003
Joined: Thu Nov 21, 2002 3:20 pm
Car: 2017 Corvette, 2018 Focus ST, 1993 240sx truck KA Turbo.
Location: Merrimack, NH

Post

http://nissannews.com/en-US/nissan/usa/ ... to-reality

Freeflow- "The digital native cohort's quest for authenticity can also be interpreted as a demand for economy and efficiency in their everyday car. For this kind of vehicle, the requisite high level of fuel economy and driving performance could come from a powertrain with a 1.2-liter or 1.5-liter gasoline engine mated to a Continuously Variable Transmission (CVT)."

Nismo- "To meet the high expectations for a powertrain equal to the task of propelling such a formidable car, one proposal from Nissan's engineers is the combination of a high-performance, eco-friendly 1.6-liter direct-injection turbocharged engine, together with a sporty CVT with 6-speed manual shift mode and synchronized rev control. The result is no less than an appealing mix of racing heritage with the finest of modern knowhow."

User avatar
float_6969
Moderator
Posts: 17366
Joined: Mon Aug 26, 2002 1:55 pm
Car: CA18DET swapped 1995 Nissan 240sx (too many mods to list)
2015 SV Leaf w/QC & Bose (daily)
Location: Topeka, Kansas
Contact:

Post

I was just thinking this earlier today. The IDx may be Nissan's "self fulfilling prophecy", they'll build a car none of use want, and will then feel vindicated when it doesn't sell.

User avatar
AZhitman
Administrator
Posts: 54542
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2002 2:04 am
Car: 58 L210, 63 Bluebird RHD, 64 NL320, 65 SPL310, 66 411 RHD, 67 WRL411, 68 510 SR20, 75 280Z RB25, 77 620 SR20, 79 B310, 90 Z32, 91 GTi-R, 92 Silvia Qs, 98 S14, 23 Z.
Location: Surprise, Arizona
Contact:

Post

This is maddening. I'm trying so hard to get excited about the IDx - I think it's a great-looking concept. But dammit, no one - NO ONE - wants a God-forsaken CVT. I heard this same blather about the Maxima, and it's getting old.

A "a formidable car" does NOT have a 1.6-liter turbo engine and a CVT. That's not "formidable." That's an APPLIANCE.

"Formidable" means: very powerful or strong : deserving serious attention and respect. The GT-R is "formidable." To imply that anything with a 1.6-l and a CVT meets that definition is to lose sight of the very meaning of automotive performance.

Every interview I read from Andy Palmer makes me wonder if he's trolling us, or if he honestly believes what he's saying. Mr. Palmer, with all due respect, if you're reading this, the contradictions and "company line" are taking a toll on overall credibility. I don't know what the suits are telling you, but the buzz in the enthusiast community is that we're being sneered at - we're even starting to hear it from inside the company. :(

I understand the knee-jerk reaction to criticism is defensiveness - but understand this: WE WANT Nissan to succeed - check that - to dominate.

I also realize I'm probably ensuring Nissan never reaches out to us again... :( ...but I'm not going to sit here and applaud the decision to sit back and let other companies OWN the affordable sports car market. My integrity and credibility is worth more than that.

User avatar
themadscientist
Posts: 26254
Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2002 3:30 pm
Car: R32 GTR, DR30 RS Turbo, BRZ, Lunchbox, NSR50 Sportster 883 Iron
Location: Staring down at you with disdain from the spooky mountaintop castle.

Post

Kia, at least you are listening. I refuse to buy a Korean car, though, sorry.

Nissan, you are not listening. I refuse to buy YOUR Japanese car.

I will make a bold prediction. Mazda will bring back a rotary car before Nissan brings a real competitor of the BRZ/86 to market.

User avatar
Bubba1
Moderator
Posts: 16082
Joined: Wed Oct 30, 2002 1:42 pm
Car: 2003 Nissan 350z
2024 Honda HR-V
2008 Toyota Corolla S
2001 Toyota Avalon XLS

Post

themadscientist wrote:Kia, at least you are listening. I refuse to buy a Korean car, though, sorry.

Nissan, you are not listening. I refuse to buy YOUR Japanese car.

I will make a bold prediction. Mazda will bring back a rotary car before Nissan brings a real competitor of the BRZ/86 to market.
I also predict if Nissan goes with a CVT in this car and tries to label it sporty, like they tried to do and failed miserably with the CVT only Maxima, the IDx will bomb and be translated as "insultingly Dull Xcrement".

User avatar
2_Liter_Turbo
Posts: 2674
Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2004 10:41 am
Car: _________________
'96 S14 Coupe: SR20VET
'90 R32 TH1 GTR: RB26DETT
'92 S13 Fastback: SR20DET
'11 V36 Sedan: VQ25HR
'06 GMT800 2500HD: LBZ Duramax
Location: DFW, Texas
Contact:

Post

If they are so hell bent on NOT giving us a proper manual gearbox, then AT LEAST give us a dual clutch slushbox like that of the GTR. CVT is about as manly as a pink glittery chihuahua purse.

User avatar
WDRacing
Moderator
Posts: 15983
Joined: Mon Nov 25, 2002 2:00 am
Car: 95 240SX, 99 BMW 540i, 01 Chevy Express, 14 Ford Escape
Location: MFFO
Contact:

Post

themadscientist wrote:Kia, at least you are listening. I refuse to buy a Korean car, though, sorry.

Nissan, you are not listening. I refuse to buy YOUR Japanese car.

I will make a bold prediction. Mazda will bring back a rotary car before Nissan brings a real competitor of the BRZ/86 to market.
A modern day 3 rotor would sell like hotcakes.

User avatar
OriginalWheelman
Posts: 5668
Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2006 3:38 am
Car: '15 Ford Focus Electric
Location: Portland, OR (or what?)

Post

Well... Look what Nissan announced today...

http://jalopnik.com/nissan-confirms-the ... 1501793053
Nissan executive vice president Andy Palmer told media there was no confirmation of which of the two concept models would hit production.

"Don't say that we won't do both, but we will definitely do one of them," he said.

He went on to hint that the IDx might have a manual transmission, or at the very least, paddle shifters.
If I don't get the clutch pedal, sorry, not interested. As is, if it's the 1.6 turbo Juke engine, it will probably still be unappealing.

User avatar
hannibal
Posts: 9680
Joined: Wed Sep 11, 2002 2:38 am
Car: Red Line to Glenmont
Location: Washington DC

Post

I wonder if that Kia is a clone of the next gen Genesis coupe...

User avatar
Kompresshun
Administrator
Posts: 3633
Joined: Sun May 10, 2009 7:41 am
Car: 2020 Nissan Pathfinder SV 4x4, 2017 Ford F150 4x4 SuperCab 3.5L Ecoboost/10AT, 2005 Nissan Pathfinder SE Offroad 5AT
Location: Louisville, KY
Contact:

Post

hannibal wrote:I wonder if that Kia is a clone of the next gen Genesis coupe...
That's exactly what it's based on actually. They stated that in a couple of the earlier articles from the show.

User avatar
Bubba1
Moderator
Posts: 16082
Joined: Wed Oct 30, 2002 1:42 pm
Car: 2003 Nissan 350z
2024 Honda HR-V
2008 Toyota Corolla S
2001 Toyota Avalon XLS

Post

OriginalWheelman wrote:
Nissan executive vice president Andy Palmer told media there was no confirmation of which of the two concept models would hit production.

"Don't say that we won't do both, but we will definitely do one of them," he said.

He went on to hint that the IDx might have a manual transmission, or at the very least, paddle shifters.
.
Not happy with his statement as I suspect if Andy was bluntly truthful and said he has no intention of offering the US market a true manual, the IDx would be DOA.


Return to “General Chat”