kade-t vs kae-t

Your premier source for information on the Turbo KA: KA24E-T and KA24DE-T (KA with aftermarket turbo kit)!
User avatar
northstar ninja
Posts: 574
Joined: Fri Nov 01, 2002 6:49 am
Car: 74 260Z, 92 240sx hatch.

Post

ok. ive decided to do a KA-t, due to many reasons, one being the availability of ka motors, and thier price (over an sr or rb). So the problem ove come to is which ka ahould i build? i have a kae in my car now. Either engine (kade or kae) id build would be a second engine built out of the car to avoid down time. so im asking anyone who knows, is the extra exausy valve worth it? and since the DE is a newer motor , would they be more reliable, especially under boosted conditions?is really apreciate any available input on this one. thanks-g


User avatar
XcreatureX
Posts: 310
Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 6:52 pm
Car: 96 240sx SE

Post

more flow the better, not saying you couldnt get there on a E but if your going to buy one why not go with more to start

Seth

Structure240sx
Posts: 5615
Joined: Sun Oct 06, 2002 5:04 pm

Post

you wont see any major difference between the two. possibly if you're going for 500+rwhp otherwise i would jsut stick with what you got to make things easier fast. if you need assitence you know where i live

User avatar
240slidekat
Posts: 532
Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2004 11:29 pm
Car: 240sx, 280z, gsxr1000, m3
Contact:

Post

it shouldnt matter as far as reliabilty because your rebuilding them right? my vote is to stick with the sohc so you dont have to change out all the wiring if you swap. the only thing is you have to search a lil harder for parts for the sohc than the dohc. but yea you wont feel any difference between the two if you boost. its all goin to be the set up thats goin to make a difference.

toki
Posts: 1344
Joined: Thu Jan 09, 2003 7:27 pm

Post

duuurrr yeah for $200 for a new cam from PDMracing you will be set for the flowz0rs.

User avatar
babowc
Posts: 3108
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 3:26 pm
Car: 240sx
Contact:

Post

welll.. isnt the sohc a little higher in compression? like 9.4:1 or something.. compared to 8.5:1 on the dohc?

correct me if im wrong^^

toki
Posts: 1344
Joined: Thu Jan 09, 2003 7:27 pm

Post

you have it backwards.

all DOHC are 9.5:1, a few early production months of the SOHC were 9.1:1, the rest are 8.6:1

User avatar
northstar ninja
Posts: 574
Joined: Fri Nov 01, 2002 6:49 am
Car: 74 260Z, 92 240sx hatch.

Post

so how would i know id my kae has 9.1:1 or 8.6:1? is there a way to check by vin #s or something klike that?

User avatar
northstar ninja
Posts: 574
Joined: Fri Nov 01, 2002 6:49 am
Car: 74 260Z, 92 240sx hatch.

Post

thanks for the info though.id so tarther do it right once than have to do it all over again.-g

User avatar
nismofly
Posts: 12505
Joined: Sat Sep 04, 2004 3:16 pm
Car: 89 Nissan 240SX Hatch

Post

my main reason for going with the de when i go turbo will be the manifold, theres a lot better manis for the de

OKCA18DET
Posts: 174
Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2004 11:34 am

Post

yea and the timing chain on the sohc is a ***** you are more prone to that thing breakin on the sohc then on the dohc (the guide rails)

User avatar
northstar ninja
Posts: 574
Joined: Fri Nov 01, 2002 6:49 am
Car: 74 260Z, 92 240sx hatch.

Post

im looking to get either an apex N1 or gt spec, i was wondering if anyone has any experience with either... id prefer the gt spec, because i believe it has no resonator, so it could flow more, with less restriction... correct me if im wrong...

this may seem like a stupid question, and im pretty sure i can , but can i get a cat back now (im looking at the apenx n1, and gt spec) and when i go turbo, have the dp replace the the header connectiong pipe and cat? i dont want to have to buy things twice, so im just double checking.

example...now:header-> connecting pipe->cat> cat backturbo:turbo manifold->turbo-> downpipe->catback

thanks-g

User avatar
WDRacing
Moderator
Posts: 15983
Joined: Mon Nov 25, 2002 2:00 am
Car: 95 240SX, 99 BMW 540i, 01 Chevy Express, 14 Ford Escape
Location: MFFO
Contact:

Post

Yep, you can get any exhaust system you want right now. BRM makes a really good exhaust and they also sponsor NICO. Check them out.

User avatar
onosqv
Posts: 5675
Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2002 12:32 pm
Car: '92 240sx Vert
Contact:

Post

WDRacing wrote:Yep, you can get any exhaust system you want right now. BRM makes a really good exhaust and they also sponsor NICO. Check them out.
Yup, they do make really nice ones, I have a 3" stainless full catback sittin in my garage right now waiting to be put on once I go turbo.

The only warning tho: if you get something for a turbo (i.e. 3" exhaust or so), it's gonna sound HELLLLLAA LOUUUDDDD on the n/a. And you may lose a lil low-end torque (but that's debatable).

As for how to tell what compression your sohc is:

http://jimwolftechnology.com/wolfpdf/ECU-ID.PDF

User avatar
Import_Ant
Posts: 640
Joined: Fri Jun 04, 2004 9:10 pm
Contact:

Post

WDRacing wrote:Yep, you can get any exhaust system you want right now. BRM makes a really good exhaust and they also sponsor NICO. Check them out.


I second that. Greg @ BRM is AWESOME I would reccomend them to anyone. Build quality is through the roof.

http://www.brmusa.com

^site

User avatar
northstar ninja
Posts: 574
Joined: Fri Nov 01, 2002 6:49 am
Car: 74 260Z, 92 240sx hatch.

Post

i believe i read a post about the brm exhaust. lots of happy nico members. i just misplaced the name for a while under a pile of other reasearch. but thanks for the site, ill defentally check it out.

also, out of curiousity, why did they make the same motor with two diffrent compression ratios? the hp out put and tq is the same on both right? thanks -g

User avatar
northstar ninja
Posts: 574
Joined: Fri Nov 01, 2002 6:49 am
Car: 74 260Z, 92 240sx hatch.

Post

the brm page for the 240sx exaust dosent work...

User avatar
2_Liter_Turbo
Posts: 2674
Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2004 10:41 am
Car: _________________
'96 S14 Coupe: SR20VET
'90 R32 TH1 GTR: RB26DETT
'92 S13 Fastback: SR20DET
'11 V36 Sedan: VQ25HR
'06 GMT800 2500HD: LBZ Duramax
Location: DFW, Texas
Contact:

Post

Correct me if I am wrong, but I have heard the SOHC KA has no oil squirters , as the DOHC does. This, in my opinion, is a very important thing to consider when going Turbo.

SHIEF
Posts: 834
Joined: Wed Jul 23, 2003 4:33 pm

Post

ElNegro wrote:Correct me if I am wrong, but I have heard the SOHC KA has no oil squirters , as the DOHC does. This, in my opinion, is a very important thing to consider when going Turbo.
True, the kae doesn't have squirters. But this is really not a big deal. In fact alot of your high hp Honda guys get rid of the squirters. It's no disadvantage to not have them. If you have a kae then stick with it. You can to just as much as the de.

DRIFTEADOR
Posts: 706
Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2004 6:17 am

Post

^ where'd you read that??

we add squirters when mating non-vtec blocks to vtec heads to handle the higher revs. i.e., ls/vtec and cr-vtec. getting rid of them increases the risk of oil starvation/spun bearing. what would be the benefits?

SHIEF
Posts: 834
Joined: Wed Jul 23, 2003 4:33 pm

Post

Didn't read that anywhere.As long as you have a good oiling system, then there is no problem getting oil where it's needed. If you have squirters then that's fine, if you don't that's fine. Either way the engine will be fine.

User avatar
2_Liter_Turbo
Posts: 2674
Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2004 10:41 am
Car: _________________
'96 S14 Coupe: SR20VET
'90 R32 TH1 GTR: RB26DETT
'92 S13 Fastback: SR20DET
'11 V36 Sedan: VQ25HR
'06 GMT800 2500HD: LBZ Duramax
Location: DFW, Texas
Contact:

Post

I'd rather have them then not. If they are there from the factory, obviously the factory engineers determined the rest of the oiling system to be inefficient. Removing them would be just plain dumb.

SHIEF
Posts: 834
Joined: Wed Jul 23, 2003 4:33 pm

Post

Oh, I'm not saying remove them if you have them. I'm just saying that the kae w/o squirters will be fine, that's all.

User avatar
northstar ninja
Posts: 574
Joined: Fri Nov 01, 2002 6:49 am
Car: 74 260Z, 92 240sx hatch.

Post

does anyone know this is correct? some one told me that the sohc wont hold more than 8 lbs of boost due to the fact that they are not forged. if so are the kade pistons better, or do i just have to have the engine bored and aftermarket slugs put in?

Structure240sx
Posts: 5615
Joined: Sun Oct 06, 2002 5:04 pm

Post

http://www.ka-t.org/jordan/

that will show you the stock kae can handle power. people have also said that the kade cant make much power stock block

im putting together a turbo kit on a sohc right now, let me know if you need my help when u are ready

User avatar
northstar ninja
Posts: 574
Joined: Fri Nov 01, 2002 6:49 am
Car: 74 260Z, 92 240sx hatch.

Post

do you have aim? can i im you?

User avatar
nismofly
Posts: 12505
Joined: Sat Sep 04, 2004 3:16 pm
Car: 89 Nissan 240SX Hatch

Post

Anthony exactly what township do you live in?

im in south jersey at various points between may and august, if you dont mind maybe i could come see your car sometime

User avatar
sil80drifter
Posts: 1313
Joined: Sun Aug 18, 2002 5:53 am
Car: 1990 240SX Hatch

Post

Hey I'm rebuilding my SOHC with all stock parts too, expecting to hit 250-300rwhp on them, with good tuning. And by good tuning I mean LiveEdit.Structure, you're not too far away from where I live (like an hour or two) we should uh... do something SOHC-T related one of these days.And swap stories and building experiences etc that pertain to the SOHC.

Also, Jordans bearings are stock, but are the pistons/rods?

Oh and anyone who wants to see what happens to stock ringlands after one week of pinging the crap out of them, AIM me, I have cool pix. In my defense, the ping sounded almost identical to the timing chain rattle, so I only realized it was ping after I did the timing chain job (urgh for the second time) and it didn't go away.

sil80
Modified by sil80drifter at 9:52 PM 4/24/2005


Return to “KA24ET / KA24DET Forum”