Hmm was under the impression the stock MAF was good for upwards of 350? I suppose not though. On a side note you don't *need* a reprogrammed ECU for the Z32 MAF you can go with a piggy back like the S-AFC II and be fine with the ECU "stock."SimpleEnigma wrote:The stock MAF is only good to about 250-260whp before its no good. Guys running 260 and up generally use the Z32 TB or a Mustang Cobra TB, but the ECU has to be reprogrammed to use each.
Search Throttle Body Boring, and you should come up with a link for a service that will bore our stock 57mm TB out to like 70mm and includes a new throttle plate.
The q45 TB is 80mm and will work using the stock TPS, and any TB made for the SR20DET will work, and a TB from a 91-94 mustang 5.0 is 70mm and will bolt up, just use your stock TPS.
Or if you want to go nuts, you can convert to ITB's using the TBs from a suzuki GSXR750 or Gixxer 1000, and a custom stand alone ecu like MegaSquirt or Haltech.
It's pretty loud.ken81590 wrote:how loud is that apexi gt spec
It's not too loud... it's tolarable.... under high rpms - it screams, but with a very deep tone, very beast like... heheheken81590 wrote:how loud is that apexi gt spec
The Q45 TB is 90mm, and do you have any link about 91-94 Mustang TB's bolting up and working? Let us know, caus 70mm does sound pretty good =)SimpleEnigma wrote:The q45 TB is 80mm and will work using the stock TPS, and any TB made for the SR20DET will work, and a TB from a 91-94 mustang 5.0 is 70mm and will bolt up, just use your stock TPS.
ITB's are independent at upto 43mm a RUNNER, that means per piston!Total in VOLUME 172mm of atmospheric consumption, compared to a plenum based TB using 70mm to consume air.........The only purpose of using small TB's (60mm) on plenums is to create a vacuum and make swirl effect to atomize air/fuel (works best in all weather conditions). Maybe a little bit to do with scavaging the intake charge, but that is probably about it when it deals with usign a plenum. But the fact is, the engine will still cram more air per stroke with a larger TB.If you can run a 3" exhaust on the rear of your engine, what is to say that you can't run a 3" TB???It's like the oximoron that doesn't like an equal balance from both ends of the engine.....spider_slayer wrote:is it jsut me or is a 70m tb overkill for a motor pushing under say... 400rwhp?
What makes an engine snappy and quick????????HP does. If throttle responce has increased the engines potential to respond and accelerate faster, HP has just been achieved.Bolt ons normally shifts HP and torque variables in the power band that is what there main purpose is. It is to manipulate the power achieved by the engine. It is also a method of fine tunning the engine to the conditions that you desire for it's enviornment.So if you are saying that the engine is snappy and much more responsive HP numbers were achieved in the low end. Power would also probably be provided in the high end since it would make an NA engine easier to obtain O2 from the atmosphere, since the diameter has increased, more air volume has increased, but not it's density.......Sorry about the double post........daconkiftador wrote: and NO it didnt give horsepower but it did make throttle response very very snappy and quick.