Sizing a turbo to a motor is easy enough. Matching a turbo to an application can be far more complicated. While more HP is generally more desirable, the more important factor is the mean HP used in the application. While most applications for auto racing will use the upper RPM range, some types of racing use the lower and mid-range RPMs as well...usually relatively briefly. In any race, the lower to mid-range RPMs will only be used when starting out from the start line or from the pits. But in road races and top speed challenges, this low and mid area will have little effect oon the overall race except for maybe positioning. But in a drag race, much of the race can be won or lost at the start where many cars will use the low and mid RPM's through 1st gear until they get to the high RPM's. If building a dedicated drag racing car, it is important to balance the high HP that helps build the trap speed along with the ability to get into the powerband quickly.
While not a direct comparison you can easily see how much of a difference a strong launch can affect a 1/4 mile run in this article:
http://www.roadandtrack.com/as...f.pdf
The Bugatti Veyron with it's 1001 HP and AWD pulls off an amazing 2.8 second 0-60. The Hennesey Viper, despite being up 100 HP and weighing 1000 lbs less, can only muster a 4.3 second 0-60. What this translates into though is in a 1/4 mile, the Veyron is still 1.1 seconds faster the Viper has been accelerating at a faster rate once it gets hooked up, allowing it to trp about 9 mph higher. What is important to note is that the Viper out accelerates the Veyron from 100-200 mph by 5 seconds. But the Veyron's launch put it so far out ahead, it still beats the Viper to the mile mark by .1 seconds. But you can see the HP to weight advantage has allowed the Viper to reel the Veyron in. In any case, the main point here is that the mean HP at launch in a drag race can really make or break a run.
Now going back to application of turbos, it is important to assess factors such as launch in the equation as well. If I were planning to build a car with a robust drivetrain and wrinkle slicks, I'd opt for a turbo that will provide a higher mean HP rating at the high RPM area. Simply drop the clutch from a high RPM and let the tires and high HP do the work. No need for low/mid RPM's and I get a fast E.T and trap speed. But if traction or the iontegrity of the drivetrain might become a problem launching in this manner, it might actually yield a faster E.T (which is of course what actually matters in a drag race) by being able to launch faster without the need for a violent launch.
In short matching a turbo to a motor can be discussed in ideals for the motor or ideals for the application. The T3/T4s (Especially the T04E-50) are proably a better all-around choice. There are applications where a smaller turbo or even a bigger turbo might make better sense.
The half-weighted crank has little to nothing to do with the turbo choice. There are probably some gains to be seen at high RPM's from a fully-counter-weighted crank, but the bigger factor here is that the KA wasn't engineered to flow as much air at higher RPM's. Some camshaft work and perhaps some head and valve work can remedy that easily enough (at least until the ppoint when the less than ideally balanced crank really becomes a problem). But in actuality, if you start to bump up the KA's max revs significantly, the T04 compressors stop being as good a match at the new high RPM range. In which case, there are likely better turbos to match the motor's new characteristics.