turtl631 wrote:1) ...I wonder if an Enthalpy ECU tune could get similar power without having to advance base timing.
2) How much of a difference do you feel between the stock s14 cams, the dual s13 exhaust cams, and the jwt cams?
1) I'm sure he could...his is more spot-on, not erring on the conservative side, like JWT. But I would bet that if you ompared notes, you find the timing curve of an Enthlpy ECU to be just a few more degrees across the board...which is the same thing as advancing the base timing a little. (BTW, met "Enthalpy" (Scott) last Sunday at an SCCA event...hung out during the event, we had lunch...nice guy. Knows his ****, obviously. He was trying to talk me into switching to one of his tunes...)
2) Stock cams: Boost came on harder, and a little lower in the RPMs (~3400rpm or so...) and then I had ~12psi and a TQ peak at ~4200...ripped the tires loose EVERY time in 2nd. Then it felt kinda flat up top...above 6k.
S13 cams: Similar to above, but everything seemed to be moved up ~400-500rpm in the power band. Spool was hurt a little (12psi by ~3500 maybe), and the TQ peak was a little "easier" (less of a hard hit)...then it pulled 'ti l redline. My favorite cams for the street....
Dual S13 exhaust cams (248/248): Similar changes from the S14 cams to the stock S13 cams...just more top end. Slower spool by maybe another 100rpm, and a much more mellow powerband (just felt like it kept making more and more power 'til redline...I'll bet a dyno would look like the JWT cams dyno).
JWT cams: Feels like an SR, or a Honda motor or something...don;t get me wrong, it's PLENTY of TQ in the midrange, but it just keeps pulng to redline, unlike any other KA I've driven.
I think what illustrates my point best is to look at the 8psi dyno I posted up there, and compare to the 12psi dyno...you can see how much harder the boost comes on between 3000 to 4000 at 8psi...versus the smoother delivery at 12spi.
Hope that helps - Brian