ZedHead wrote:Do people really have hydrolock issues with an intake? I cant imagine an intake being able to suck enough water to hydro an engine. Fully submerged yes, but a puddle? If the water is that deep you should be smart enough not to drive through it at any high rate of speed anyway.
On a side note. I had an 88 prelude SI that I poured water through. Disconnected the intake at the throttle body, rev'ed it to about 4k and just poured water in it. Gallons at a time, 4 I think, smoking white out the tail pipe like crazy. Mostly to steam clean (or try to) the inside of the engine to remove build-up of carbon. This was done on a cold engine. No hydrolock, ran fine, had 155k or so on it. I guess I don't understand the hydrolock issue associated with intakes. It would take a lot of water all at once. I don't drive through standing water, it should be common sense, water is bad on a hot engine.
Edt: Driving through a ankle deep puddle? Not likely at all.
That is/was an old Smokey Yunick trick (I'm sure others did it, too) to clean the valves and combustion chambers on a carbureted engine. But I wouldn't recommend it on a dry manifold application. But even on a dry manifold like that one, at a higher rpm, the velocity of the air in the intake would partially atomize the water and therefore not hydrolock.
Not sure about it mattering or not if the engine is cold or at operating temp if the water were room temperature.
Where one gets into trouble would be a low rpm gulp (which wouldn't take much) then of course one or more cylinders gets partially filled with water (not water vapor) and yes, it's game over.
Modified by HeavyDuty at 3:54 PM 9/18/2009