TDot wrote:The other thing that has me nervous is enough people have stated there jumper went dead after a few months, plus there's only a six month warranty on them. I have to read deeper in the reviews to see how long the ones who rated it very high owned them. Yeah, I'll look at the 16000 version.
It is possible to make a good LION batter, but it is also possible to make a cheap one. That would make me very nervous based solely on experience. When dealing with laptops, the batteries usually last three years, longer with Apple, presumably shorter with generic/whitebox brands. I had a Dell battery for a desktop replacement that drew a lot of power (had an Intel Centrino D, nVidia Quadro, and 17 inch screen), and the battery went bad after a few years, so I bought a refurb from one of those places that wants your core and claims to use newer smaller better cells to make the battery better than factory. Well, I actually use the laptop, and what I found was that battery would die within a few heavy charge cycles. I got it replaced four times in six months before finally contacting the BBB because the company didn't want to refund my money. OTOH, it is possible that this company uses a good LION provider and the short term failures are outliers. On that note, I have seen non-LION jump kits used daily in the real world on big vehicles (like an old Land Rover someone drives at work), and that makes me think maybe the car doesn't draw anywhere near peak, so if it's a good high-output battery, maybe it could handle it and last. I also find that hard to believe considering the fact that fast-discharge 12V dry-cell batteries always swell up in UPS systems that run a heavy load. You're talking about a 7AH being drained in 10+ minutes, and they can't handle it. If LION batteries could do this, I would expect to see a lot more LION UPS systems.
Double E wrote:Dustin, That Mazda dying was possibly from the process you used.
Cars today are smart enough to see a low power situation and signal to the alternator to put it into the battery with a high amp or low amp amount. The process I would have used is to first crank the Mazda, then connect it to the M45. Turn off the Mazda, then re-fire the Mazda. The Mazda would "see" the low power and add more amperage current from the alt to the battery (and subsequently the M45). Finally, a little increased RPM in the Mazda probably would have given the Mazda the ability to feed a higher amp to the battery and keep all things running.
As you did it, the Mazda never "noticed" the M45 was connected because once the Mazda started, it only fed it a trickle current at best. Once the big draw hit the Mazda from the M45 trying to start, it immediately drew away power to the Ignition of the Mazda.
Of course, cable gauge plays a role in this too. Heavier cable is always better. Never carry less than 4GA cable if you want to be able to count on it working.
Thanks for the input, I knew output capabilities were higher at a higher RPM, but I've never heard of cars doing what you describe (though it doesn't surprise me, I just learned on a really old car [old enough it had a generator light even though it came factory with an alternator]). The jumper cables are not cheapies. I don't remember the gauge, but they aren't light or thin, and they certainly worked fine when connected to the full-size van and in several other scenarios with other cars.