Juke highway Fuel economy

The web's first forum dedicated to the Nissan Juke and the Nissan Qazana.
pieceofnissan
Posts: 6
Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2011 11:45 pm
Car: 2011 Nissan Juke S

Post

How are you Juke owners doing on the highway for fuel economy. So far with mine I'm getting 25.4 MPG. not so good


User avatar
GRey1
Posts: 120
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2010 7:06 am
Car: 2015 Gun Metallic SL AWD w/Tech
2011 Chrome Nissan Juke SV CVT-AWD
Location: The Burbs of Cleveland

Post

I'm about 60% highway and getting about 23-25 mpg.

User avatar
Abear
Posts: 45
Joined: Mon Nov 15, 2010 3:02 pm
Car: Juke SV / 09 EX35 Journey / 04 350z Roadster

Post

pieceofnissan wrote:How are you Juke owners doing on the highway for fuel economy. So far with mine I'm getting 25.4 MPG. not so good


Are you doing the fuel/mileage calculation yourself or using the car's computer. You should be aware that the Juke's computer consistently averages 2 mpg's lower then you actual mile/gal. :werd:

User avatar
GRey1
Posts: 120
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2010 7:06 am
Car: 2015 Gun Metallic SL AWD w/Tech
2011 Chrome Nissan Juke SV CVT-AWD
Location: The Burbs of Cleveland

Post

I know I calculate mine based on the miles driven since last fillup and the number of gallons it takes to fill it back up. Much more reliable than the computer.

pieceofnissan
Posts: 6
Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2011 11:45 pm
Car: 2011 Nissan Juke S

Post

Excellent point on computer MPG calculation. My Honda Civic Hybrid was always 2 to 3 MPG lower than miles/tank fill gallons calculation. I will watch.

pfager
Posts: 6
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2011 8:25 am
Car: 2011 Nissan Juke

Post

Over 4,300 miles on my Juke. 60%+ highway. Car is averaging 21.4 MPG!! Horrible!! My calculations match the computer almost exactly.

pfager
Posts: 6
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2011 8:25 am
Car: 2011 Nissan Juke

Post

Oh yeah, the sales manager says the car really hits its peak MPG after 9,000 miles. Anyone ever heard anything so absurd?

User avatar
Eikon
Posts: 11036
Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2004 3:20 am
Car: 71 240z, 93 Supra TT
Location: Lake Orion, MI
Contact:

Post

yes, most engines do take some time to get broken in properly. The piston rings take a while to seat properly and reduce resistance so that the motor can operate more efficiently.
Have you ever seen performance tests from the automobile magazines? They'll do yearly reviews.. The brand new 0-60 time will be like 7.2 and the 1 year later - 20,000 mile test will be 0-60 in 7.0. It's because the motors break in better over time and become more efficient.

Think about it.. You have a bunch of moving metal parts packed into a VERY tight space. Over time they wear against each other and smooth out the edges and parts that rub and touch.

User avatar
Promise Land
Posts: 2168
Joined: Tue Mar 10, 2009 6:52 am
Car: 2011 Nissan Versa
2001 Chevy Suburban
1992 Ford Mustang
Location: Sprague River, OR
Contact:

Post

The MR18s in the Versa take 8-10k before the break in well. We have multiple people that went from mid 20's to low thirties around that mark. I am curious if the MR16DDT will do the same.


Return to “Juke Forum | Qazana Forum”