NY94J30 wrote:I owned 2 J30s (1994, 1996 T) before my current Q (1999). The J has a much smaller, more intimate, feel, both inside the cabin and as a whole. It took me some time to feel comfortable in the bigger Q. While I wouldn't call the J floaty, neither the standard nor touring model J was as tight as my touring Q. Gas mileage was only minimally better, too; I was lucky to get 24mpg on a long hwy trip. Good tires are also important, as the rear end is very easy to get loose. Rex is right about the timing belt (105K on 95+, 60K before), as the VG is an interference engine. All in all, it was a great car, and a great looking (IMO) and unique car, and if there were more low mileage examples, I might have another one.
Feel free to ask any specific questions.
Thanks, this is good info (and of course to everyone else). The part about it being smaller will appeal to my mom since it will be her car. It seems that there are tons of trashed examples, few low mileage ones, kind of like early 90's Q's.
I also think that they are great looking, first time I ever saw one until the last time (yesterday)-but lord do I hate those reverse lights.
On a related note, it seems that the 2000+ I30's are so much cleaner, better cared for than the 98/99 models. I can't remember the last time I saw a 98/99 that had clean wheels and shiny paint.
Tech, good to know the 300TT comparison, I read a thread somewhere on here where a guy put a 300Z engine into a J30 and the problems he was having make some of the stuff on the Q45 board look like child's play.