Got any years that these powerhouse engines where placed in the cars above?Jesda wrote:The closest competitor I can think of in terms of power, weight, and packaging efficiency is the Cadillac Northstar, which is more powerful
Then there's the 280hp 4.6L Cobra motor in the Lincoln Continental and Mark VIII, which pretty much rocks.
What makes the VK less dependable?Jesda wrote:Most powerful, no. Thats the 340hp VK45. (least dependable)Most durable, no. Thats the 266hp VH41. (least powerful)
Early ring wear, excessive oil consumption.MattB wrote:
What makes the VK less dependable?
93+ for the Northstar. Changed a bit in 98 (to prevent head gasket failure) and again in 2000 (to run on regular fuel) and 2005 (more power). Originally made 275-295hp. Current iterations claim 320.kirbyQ45 wrote:Got any years that these powerhouse engines where placed in the cars above?
Does this affect all VKs or has this problem been corrected?Jesda wrote:
Early ring wear, excessive oil consumption.
agreed.. and we have made a full circle..... 315HP is what the VH45 puts out with EC.qship96 wrote:also,dont believe the 340hp rating of the vk45,as even Infiniti admits on their web site correct,current SAE testing will show lower HP numbers,as do many japanese vehicles- lexus ls430 ratings dropped from 290 advertised hp to 278- nissan motors says it refuses to retest current production engines{ therefor hiding behind the asterick and small print in ads}many manufacturers somewhat cheated the old lax sae hp rating systems by partially filled crankcases and disconnecting p/s pumps during testing,among other tricks to boost advertised hp numbers- my guess,the vk has 315-320 hp max.
Open deck design and no crankshaft girdle.MattB wrote:What makes the VK less dependable?