Unfortunately, a V10 would be too limited in market appeal and too costly to develop. Maybe if Renault were to build a complimentary car, but otherwise develoment costs would be out the window. I would be happy with a big bore (say 105mm) V8.ceningolmo wrote:V10 w/500hp is mandatory to put it back at the forefront and beat the latest entries from BMW, MB, and Lexus.
Q45man1 wrote:http://americajr.com/news/naia....html
Concept Q will be at the Detroit auto show next March. Hopefully it will be the next gen Q for 2008 or 2009 release.
Hot damn!DetroitJazzMan wrote: the detroit show is actually in january. I will be attending a preview of this show and will take detailed pics and post shortly after show. Jazz
You have my vote here.ceningolmo wrote:Interior needs to return to the beautiful simplicity that made it so great.
If that grey thing at the top of the page is supposed to be a Q conception, the artists needs to lay off the crack. It's pure Toyota. Looks like a bad combination of the current Avalon and LS.AZhitman wrote:The new Q is rumored to debut in 08 and be powered by a 5.0 litre variation of the current VK45DE, with the symmetrical dual intake / exhaust of the VQ35HR (www.VQ35HR.com).
http://img206.imageshack.us/im...2.jpg
The Ultimate Driving MachinePeterofdevon wrote:Example: I test drove the 06M45s twice. I really liked it until I drove a 540i6 sport. You've read by blather on this...
There are no VK powered cars available with a manual. The M isn't available with a manual, so I doubt the Q will be. Plus there really is no market in the US for a large M/T sedan. A manual M35/M45 really should be out there because they compete with the 5-series which currently offers the only manual in the class (A6 doesn't, E-class doesn't, Lexus GS certainly doesn't), but a manual Q would never sell IMO.Sharpel007 wrote:a manual wouldnt surprise me considering how the rest of the current cars can get one, oh well we shall see in less than a month, you f50 owners better get ready for an even biiger drop in value.
Yeah man i agree with you on that...but that's because of the new luxury thing right now it hard to be a "luxury" car when you can get a the new nissan altima with most of the stuff that the M has. and by the way the new alt. is just a M with a different tail light.MattB wrote:
And that concept drawing that was posted is hideous. It looks like a disgusting combination of an M45 and a Ford Five Hundred.
Not today, and no plans from Nissans sites.bruce.weiland wrote:Really? Is the Altima rear wheel drive?
Jesda for president!!!!Jesda wrote:In terms of style, the M and Altima are indeed much alike. Its a commendably engineered car thats a complete bore to look at -- I'd even say the Altima is more attractive.
Stealth?
I looked at and sat in the new Altima while waiting to have my A33 I30's oil changed the other day. It's a nice car, and definately does share some styling cues from the M, but it's still not close to being the same car. It's not the first time an Altima has taken Infiniti styling cues, the 93-97 Altimas were supposed to look like the J30. And IIRC you can't get an Altima with Intelligent Cruise Control or a bunch of the M's technology toys. I'd personally take my A33 over the new Altima any day, even though the A33 was supposedly a "low" for Infiniti.Balt wrote:
Yeah man i agree with you on that...but that's because of the new luxury thing right now it hard to be a "luxury" car when you can get a the new nissan altima with most of the stuff that the M has. and by the way the new alt. is just a M with a different tail light.