is the 5.3 silverado motor have the same block as the ls1?

V8 240sx? Sure! If either the chassis OR the engine is non-Nissan (i.e. SR20 in an RX-7 or LS1 in a 240sx), we've done it.
motorboater
Posts: 176
Joined: Sun Nov 16, 2008 7:12 pm
Car: nissan 240sx

Post

i am thinking about doing the swap and would like to know if the t56 tranny fits on it and the gto oil pan will? any helo be appreciated.


User avatar
Eikon
Posts: 11036
Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2004 3:20 am
Car: 71 240z, 93 Supra TT
Location: Lake Orion, MI
Contact:

Post

Yes, I believe you can interchange the 5.3, 5.7 and 6.0 Gen 3 SBC motors. So you'll be fine using the T56 and a GTO front sump oil pan. You'll want to pick up a car style intake as well because the tall truck intake will not allow your hood to close very well. Plus you'll need to swap to the ls1 accesories also.. the truck alternator sits too high.

motorboater
Posts: 176
Joined: Sun Nov 16, 2008 7:12 pm
Car: nissan 240sx

Post

thanks for the post. i planned on the intake. but didnt know about the alternator. ls1 are harder to get out here it seems and the 5.3 are everywhere for cheap. so i think i might just go with that.

User avatar
Eikon
Posts: 11036
Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2004 3:20 am
Car: 71 240z, 93 Supra TT
Location: Lake Orion, MI
Contact:

Post

Yeah, the LM7 is a plentiful and very inexpensive motor.. but can still make pretty big power.

If you can get your hands on a LQ4, that would be better yet. Look for a 2001 and up 6.0L LQ4 out of a 2500 series truck. It's the same iron block as the 5.3, but bored out much more... As long as you are going heavy, might as well get the displacement to match. The 6.0L motor is great because you can bolt on a set of L92 heads and make a TON of power.. I've read articles that put it at 500 hp with those heads and a decent cam. Easy as pie!. Don't get the 99/00 model though because the crank was machined to fit only the 4l80e trans.. so you would need to swap cranks to get the t56 to mate with it.

Good luck with your build.

CCS200SX
Posts: 2
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 1:53 pm
Car: 200SX SWAP LS V8

Post



iron or aluminium ..5.3 bore 96mm 5.7 ls1 bore 99mm, but 5.3 you can bore to 99...

User avatar
slidestyle69
Posts: 500
Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2009 6:11 am
Car: 92 s13
Location: Alabama

Post

CCS200SX wrote:
iron or aluminium ..5.3 bore 96mm 5.7 ls1 bore 99mm, but 5.3 you can bore to 99...
that would be only personal preference...taking the cylinder walls down that much is putting alot risk on a cracked sleeve if you add abunch of power additives. I would just get a 6.0 block and call it a day.

the bore is really the only difference between the besides some ls1's are 4 bolt main and the 5.3's are 2 bolt mains..correct me if im wrong when i say all 5.3's are 2 bolt mains..but the stroke is same pretty much between the two.

http://en.wakopedia.org/wiki/G...07.29

this link shows some useful info between all gm motors including the 5.3/5.7/6.0

User avatar
C2CAHOON
Posts: 6
Joined: Tue Mar 16, 2010 8:23 am
Contact:

Post

any of the gen 3 small blocks are a good starting point, im partial to the 5.3 because of the smaller bore they rev quicker, if you rework a set of heads, cam, and an intake, you can put down 400+ and have more torque than you want

User avatar
cnichols
Posts: 1832
Joined: Tue Aug 06, 2002 6:07 pm
Car: 96 Nissan 240SX, 99 Infiniti Q45, 93 Ford Fastiva
Location: Bowling Green, KY
Contact:

Post

C2CAHOON wrote:any of the gen 3 small blocks are a good starting point, im partial to the 5.3 because of the smaller bore they rev quicker, if you rework a set of heads, cam, and an intake, you can put down 400+ and have more torque than you want
The smaller bore won't help it rev much quicker or higher...it's such a small difference, piston weight will still be relatively the same. The 4.8 on the other hand, has the same bore as the 5.3, but a smaller stroke. Putting a 4.8 crank in a 6.0 block would be a nice combo as you would get a big bore and small stroke which would be more ideal for a high revving engine.

240cp
Posts: 306
Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2007 6:03 pm
Car: 95 240sx

Post

slidestyle69 wrote:
the bore is really the only difference between the besides some ls1's are 4 bolt main and the 5.3's are 2 bolt mains..correct me if im wrong when i say all 5.3's are 2 bolt mains..but the stroke is same pretty much between the two.
I have never seen a lsx or lqx that is a two bolt or 4 bolt. That is in the older gen small block chevy's. I have been inside quite a few of the gen III motor, aluminum and iron and all that i have come across are 6 bolt. Four on top of the cap and two from the side.

kyhunter89
Posts: 125
Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2009 6:21 am
Car: 1989 240sx 5 speed

Post

all i've seen are 6 bolt. the l33 is iron 5.3 and lm7 is alum 5.3 btw

lq4powereds13
Posts: 2
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2009 4:19 pm
Car: 91 240sx

Post

kyhunter89 wrote:all i've seen are 6 bolt. the l33 is iron 5.3 and lm7 is alum 5.3 btw
You have that backwards, lm7 is iron, l33 is the alum version.

kyhunter89
Posts: 125
Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2009 6:21 am
Car: 1989 240sx 5 speed

Post

Your right... thats what happens when i state things off my head


Return to “Hybrids”