that would be only personal preference...taking the cylinder walls down that much is putting alot risk on a cracked sleeve if you add abunch of power additives. I would just get a 6.0 block and call it a day.CCS200SX wrote:
iron or aluminium ..5.3 bore 96mm 5.7 ls1 bore 99mm, but 5.3 you can bore to 99...
The smaller bore won't help it rev much quicker or higher...it's such a small difference, piston weight will still be relatively the same. The 4.8 on the other hand, has the same bore as the 5.3, but a smaller stroke. Putting a 4.8 crank in a 6.0 block would be a nice combo as you would get a big bore and small stroke which would be more ideal for a high revving engine.C2CAHOON wrote:any of the gen 3 small blocks are a good starting point, im partial to the 5.3 because of the smaller bore they rev quicker, if you rework a set of heads, cam, and an intake, you can put down 400+ and have more torque than you want
I have never seen a lsx or lqx that is a two bolt or 4 bolt. That is in the older gen small block chevy's. I have been inside quite a few of the gen III motor, aluminum and iron and all that i have come across are 6 bolt. Four on top of the cap and two from the side.slidestyle69 wrote:
the bore is really the only difference between the besides some ls1's are 4 bolt main and the 5.3's are 2 bolt mains..correct me if im wrong when i say all 5.3's are 2 bolt mains..but the stroke is same pretty much between the two.
You have that backwards, lm7 is iron, l33 is the alum version.kyhunter89 wrote:all i've seen are 6 bolt. the l33 is iron 5.3 and lm7 is alum 5.3 btw