Sentientbydesign wrote:Better than using cruise control is actually maintaining your acceleration. In other words, if you're going 70 and approach an incline, don't try to maintain 70, allow yourself to slow down while going up the hill and gradually return to 70 when the road flattens.
Yes, of course. But rather than acceleration, I believe you mean maintaining "energy." The concept of "total energy management" is fundamental but in a practical sense applied to aircraft more than cars (unless it's a hybrid). You are converting your kinetic energy (speed) into potential energy (height) by coasting up the hill. Your are gaining back that kinetic energy (speed) coasting down the other side of the hill. Energy is conserved (constant) except for losses due to friction and drag. Step on the gas and you put more energy into the system, which you must do to speed up or climb long hills. Steady cruising requires enough energy to balance out the friction and drag losses to maintain a constant speed.
mgh = 1/2 m( v )^2 (I really am sorry to include an equation!)
This works in cars but you are limited because you can't let your speed drop off too much or you become an obstacle to other traffic. If you fly you can really see the conservation of energy in action as the correlation in speed drop with altitude gain can be dramatic when you really yank back on the stick. Conversely the speed increase with altitude loss if you dive. I used a total energy compensated variometer in my sailplane. Life get more complicated when the air your are flying through may also be going up or down and you don't have an engine.
Modified by leeG35 at 7:27 PM 5/2/2008