I can't think of one car made that has a 1kgf/mm spring rate. That's equal to a 56 lb. spring.InsanityInc wrote:1kg/mm is a fairly large difference. Keep in mind that a lot of street cars have 1kg/mm springs or LESS. A lower rear springrate will be worse at keeping the back end on the ground, so if you want to OMGDRIFTJDMTYTE, then you'd want a lower rate in the back.
No. Stiffer spring rates improve road holding, if they weakened road holding, why would anyone go to stiffer springs? So, if you have stiffer springs in the back, they're going to hold to the road better than the front during lateral acceleration, meaning it's going to be harder to induce oversteer.crzycav86 wrote:You wrote just the opposite.
A stiffer rear spring rate will tend to increase oversteer. Thus, if you want ultraJDMdoriftotyt3... get stiffer rear y0.
A Cadillac has higher spring rates than any 240... it's just "soft" because it has 4500 lbs. of car pressing down on it.InsanityInc wrote:That's probably because you generally don't see the spring rates listed for non-sports cars. Most cadillacs (especially older ones) have incredibly soft springs.
Incorrect, a harder spring just reduces the amount of roll and resulting suspension bump when compressed. When you hit bumps it will not compress and absorb the bump, it will simply skate over it which is a loss of traction.InsanityInc wrote:
No. Stiffer spring rates improve road holding, if they weakened road holding, why would anyone go to stiffer springs? So, if you have stiffer springs in the back, they're going to hold to the road better than the front during lateral acceleration, meaning it's going to be harder to induce oversteer..
So let me remove the coilovers from my car, and replace them with solid steel rods. Zero suspension travel has got to give me f1-style handling, because it'd be so stiff... right?InsanityInc wrote:No. Stiffer spring rates improve road holding, if they weakened road holding, why would anyone go to stiffer springs?
]InsanityInc wrote:
No. Stiffer spring rates improve road holding, if they weakened road holding, why would anyone go to stiffer springs? So, if you have stiffer springs in the back, they're going to hold to the road better than the front during lateral acceleration, meaning it's going to be harder to induce oversteer.
That's probably because you generally don't see the spring rates listed for non-sports cars. Most cadillacs (especially older ones) have incredibly soft springs.
Ahahaha. Nice.Exar-Kun wrote:]
Read the FAQ....Also, you're the first to earn my new picture for those who Don't read the faq before making a comment.
What are you planning on doing with your car?Bronze MFP wrote:After x-mas i'm planning on purchasing coilovers. I kinda had my heart set on the Nismo R-tune setup, it has 8kg/mm springs up front and 7kg/mm springs rear. Only problem with them, is they are pricey (~1500 bux) and I have no clue if the struts are rebuildable or replaceable. SPL parts' KTS coilovers feature an 8kg/mm front spring and a 6kg/mm rear spring, are ~1100 bucks and the dampers are replaceable. So, will that 1kg/mm springrate change in the rear be noticable? Thanks in advance.
Gay.chmercer wrote:i want gr-6 in 12/10 with the camber bracket.... i could run super slammed all the time and not rub, lol