skydragoness wrote:So I don't understand why people need "more"

This comes back to the same answer I ALWAYS give as to why I prefer Android, why I have a smartphone in the first place and "What does your Android phone do that the iPhone doesn't?":
People who ask that question are looking for a PHONE that does stuff.
I am looking for a COMPUTER. A device. The phone being attached simply means I get to carry one fewer things in my pocket.
I have had a "PDA" or other electronic assistant of some kind since...Hell, as long as I can remember. Back in elementary school I had a
SEGA IR7000 Communicator. I certainly did not have a cell phone then. Later, I got a Palm M100, then a Compaq iPaq, and an NEC MobilePro. These were handheld computing devices. I used them for handheld computing stuff. Largely gaming, I will not deny. But note-taking, calendars and scheduling, calculator functions, translation, utility apps, you name it.
Eventually, these devices started to merge with phones. It was a logical progression. My iPaq needed a bulky expansion sleeve and a PCMCIA card nearly the size of the device itself just to connect to WIFI, and driver support for WiFi standards via PCMCIA was terrible on fully-fledged Windows in those days, nevermind Windows CE/Mobile. So adding wifi and cellular data into the device from the start made tons of sense.
The thing you have to remember is this:
These were not designed to be a phone that "did more."
These were designed to be a PDA that had networking capabilities on the go.
The fact that they combined two devices a lot of people already carried into one single device was an obvious bonus.
So, the answer to "what more do you need from a phone" is: Absolutely nothing.
The real question is "what do you want your handheld computer to do.
The answer to THAT is: Whatever the Hell I ask of it, including installing applications from any source, upgrading or downgrading at my leisure, having total control of the filesystems and security features, and being able to customise the user experience. I wouldn't tolerate a PC that restricted what I could do with it artificially for the sake of "user-friendliness" (and Windows 8 is already way too close to that approach). I don't want it from my handhelds, either. I run Ubuntu on my PC. I run Android on my mobile devices. I've owned Apple products (full-on computers, iThings) and they are always too busy being purpose-built to be useful for me.
Just as with cars, I will ALWAYS prefer "does what I tell it to do" over "Just works" every single day of the week.
I don't buy smartphones because I want a fancy phone. I buy smartphones because they're the Palm Pilots of 2013. The fact that I can make calls on them is entirely beside the point and a non-factor in the DEVICE's capabilities. I use my phones for non-phone stuff a Hell of a lot more than for phone stuff. And the fact that smartphones have spawned tablets (nothing more than giant smartphones stripped of calling capabilities) is a great illustrator of the pervasiveness of this behavior.
I'm perfectly happy with a phone that just makes calls. But if I'm going to have a portable computer on me, it might as well have mobile data capabilities, which means Cellular support...which means why the Hell not just make the thing a phone?