Jacko3 wrote:My good friend, Infiniti/Nissan is lousy at wowing their customers with digital gimmickery and gadgetry. All they do is produce a sound and exciting engine and a sound and exciting transmission---period! I like it that way. The technological marvel of their cars reside somewhere in the heart of their computer programs or ECU. Very few cars the size of the G-35 and G-37 can sustain the level of punishment these cars can take and yet last as long as they do.
So, in sacrifice to electronic gadgetry, we are happy campers with a car that has an impressive level of reliability, than your Audi. And, I can bet if we torture your Audi day in day out like many of us do with our G-35 or G-37, I am probabaly very sure problems will arise pretty soon.
I had a friend with a 2001 VW passat or is that what you call Audi's A4, who had his automatic transmission quit at 150,000K with only high way driving---no WOT or full throttle for the most part. This type of problem is unheard of with Nissans and Infinitis, except if the issue was due to manufacterurer's defect or outright abuse and lack of maintenance, and even then, that is very rare.
I can't remember when anyone complianed about an engine problem or transmission problem on this forum that went beyond replacing batteries, cleaning a cold air intake, or replacing an oxygen sensor, or cleaning a MAF, etc. So, if you plan to buy a G-37 or a G-37, you are going to sacrifice electronic gimmickery for reliability.
Wow, what a reply. Let's see if I can cover all the points.I wouldn't really constitute pressure monitoring a gimmick. Lane departure, intelligent cruise, etc, I'll agree with. The Infiniti does have some elec/digital items that are not required. The motorized backseat entrance on the coupe and illuminated sill plates are two that come to mind. Every manuf has their signatures or little items they think are important like the active steering or electric tilt/telescope with gauges attached from Infiniti or interior materials, folding rear seats, active suspension, vertical lumbar adjust or above mentioned departure & cruise items from Audi. Acura's known for infinite amounts of tech, while BMW feels an overall smaller car and included maint are important. American companies view size, motor (in most cases), and basement pricing as important. Every firm has its preferences and filter as to what is important to the market.The power, sound, and reliability are three of the biggest reasons I'm looking at the G. I was never arguing the reliability. It’s well-known in Japanese cars (save for the paint, of course)My Audi has been quite reliable overall to this point, and I don't drive easy. I will agree, however, that it is not as reliable. No German is.As a clarification, the Passat and A4 are two different platforms.I bought the A4 for its looks, handling, interior refinement, and ability to mod affordably, which is why I’m looking at another one. I’m looking at the G for the power, reliability, value, and ability to mod, although the breadth of products available is seemingly smaller, and the power mods are more expensive.Pound for pound, the G is a better value than the A4 for the reasons mentioned above. The only real downsides I have for the G at this point are the aforementioned cost of modding, and the fact that they are much more of a commodity on the streets than the Audi, especially the new one. Like I said from the beginning, the G is definitely on my short list for all of the same reasons you all love yours. Only time, availability, and deal will tell where I end up. Thanks again for the insight and warm welcome.