Interesting thought about the VH45DE

A Q45 forum / Cima forum for the President of Infiniti's lineup. Brought to you by Infiniti Parts USA, your OEM source for Q45 parts!
User avatar
elwesso
Posts: 30810
Joined: Sun Feb 23, 2003 4:52 pm
Car: 94 Infiniti Q45t 5 spd
2007 BMW M Coupe
2007 Infiniti G35 S 6MT
Location: Indiana
Contact:

Post

So this evening I was talking to another unidentified Q owner, and an interesting thought came to mind..

As we know, the main differences between the 90-93 VH45 and 94-95 VH45 are as follows

- Guides from the factory- Sodium filled valves- Injectors- Heads- intake runners- various wiring- other random things

So I was thinking... What IF someone took a 94 engine and simply swapped in the sodium filled valves... To me, that is really the only major difference where the 94 engine got worse... that HAS to be where the alleged extra HP remains (I still think most of it is in that 1st gear and the ECU tuning)... Heres some things we KNOW..

The short block is the same for the most part, meaning pistons, rods and stuff was not changed, meaning it uses the same CR.... The only major differences were in the long block (mechanically), using the different heads for RTV valve covers, siamesed intake ports, and so on...

It almost seems too obvious... the 94 and later engines are just better overall it seems because of the more reliable injectors, the non siamesed ports (better for boost?), metal guides from the factory, better wiring, uses valve cover gaskets instead of RTV, and continues to boast similar reliability with Jamesmost's stock 95 engine lasting well over 300k with the absolute tar driven out of it.

To me it seems like the easy way to make the so called "ultimate VH45" still using all factory parts... the question is if the sodium valves will go into the 94 heads...


User avatar
Ezekial
Posts: 355
Joined: Sun Nov 28, 2004 4:42 pm
Car: 2001 Nissan 200SX S15

Post

elwesso wrote:So this evening I was talking to another unidentified Q owner, and an interesting thought came to mind..

As we know, the main differences between the 90-93 VH45 and 94-95 VH45 are as follows

- Guides from the factory- Sodium filled valves- Injectors- Heads- intake runners- various wiring- other random things

So I was thinking... What IF someone took a 94 engine and simply swapped in the sodium filled valves... To me, that is really the only major difference where the 94 engine got worse... that HAS to be where the alleged extra HP remains (I still think most of it is in that 1st gear and the ECU tuning)... Heres some things we KNOW..

The short block is the same for the most part, meaning pistons, rods and stuff was not changed, meaning it uses the same CR.... The only major differences were in the long block (mechanically), using the different heads for RTV valve covers, siamesed intake ports, and so on...

It almost seems too obvious... the 94 and later engines are just better overall it seems because of the more reliable injectors, the non siamesed ports (better for boost?), metal guides from the factory, better wiring, uses valve cover gaskets instead of RTV, and continues to boast similar reliability with Jamesmost's stock 95 engine lasting well over 300k with the absolute tar driven out of it.

To me it seems like the easy way to make the so called "ultimate VH45" still using all factory parts... the question is if the sodium valves will go into the 94 heads...
or better yet, run the 94 model engine with some new stainless valves

why is a rocker cover gasket better than RTV? I hate gaskets! The best thing about the VH45 engine is barely no gaskets!!

User avatar
Jeff Williams
Posts: 3394
Joined: Fri Aug 02, 2002 4:17 am
Car: 1994 Infiniti Q45t
2000 Infiniti I30t
2004 Infiniti M45
71, 72, 73, 82 & 2000 Corvettes
Contact:

Post

Just refil that Nitrous bottle, and call it a day.

User avatar
nchopp
Posts: 6938
Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2005 5:17 am

Post

Jeff Williams wrote:Just refil that Nitrous bottle, and call it a day.

User avatar
Flagship-Q
Posts: 306
Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2005 3:59 pm
Car: 1992 Infiniti Q45

Post

I was under the impression that the 90-93 heads flowed better than the later models. If that was the case, then wouldn't that be a step backwards to go with 94 heads? Just a thought.

defrag010
Posts: 405
Joined: Mon Jan 02, 2006 7:52 pm

Post

Siamesed intake ports will create an air flow restriction on the junction where the two ports split. When you port a head with 2 intake valves per cylinder, you focus on this part the most so you can make it as sharp as possible.If you want to boost the motor, you don't need to take this into consideration as much as you do overall intake runner size and shape.

Sodium valves offer no immediate horsepower gains. Where they benefit from is better heat rejection, which basically means more longetivity due to less heat transfer from the valve to the seat. They have the same affect as stainless valves.

If I were going to build me up a set of VH heads I would press in some new seat inserts, find some 1mm oversize stainless valves, blend the bowls, and teardrop the guide boss along with hogging out the intake runners for more port volume and less restriction from the junction split. Oh, can't forget to shim the valvesprings for a little more pressure and a set of mild cams.

User avatar
Jesda
Posts: 39644
Joined: Mon May 05, 2003 1:50 pm
Location: STL, DTW
Contact:

Post

The biggest difference is in weight. The 94 Q45 is a fantastic long-distance touring car, thanks in part to extra sound deadening and more luxury features. At 3800 lbs, the 90-93 Q without active or TCS is as light as the Q gets without turning into a spartan econobox.

I definitely prefer RTV over gaskets. My last Q at 210k never had the valve covers done, and didnt need them. GM favors cork gaskets. Spend a few moments at the Cadillac forum to see why RTV is better.

Now, it would be nice to get those 94 injectors into a 90-93.

Q45tech
Moderator
Posts: 14296
Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2002 3:19 am
Car: 1990 Q45 342,400 miles 22 years ownership with original engine
1995 G20t 5 speed 334,000 miles 16" 2002 wheels - 205/50/16 Sr20ve vvl

Post

The siamesed ports are easier to tune for fuel reversion. Notice the bump in lower port path..........really tricky to create every ounce much less a full lb/ft at 1600 rpm lugging up a small hill in 100F ambient with AC on and a full load of Sumo bodyguards.

Redesigning for an extra presurized flow would obviously require some changes in the head.

User avatar
RobertsnewQ
Posts: 811
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 10:56 am

Post

Jesda - someone on the forum is doing/did the 94 injector swap. You need the rails, at least...

User avatar
Jesda
Posts: 39644
Joined: Mon May 05, 2003 1:50 pm
Location: STL, DTW
Contact:

Post

[QUOTE=RobertsnewQ]Jesda - someone on the forum is doing/did the 94 injector swap. You need the rails, at least...[/QUOTE

Now THAT is interesting.

PopPop
Posts: 3129
Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2005 8:50 pm
Car: 1990-91 infiniti Q45's, S13 Coupe, 3rd GEN. Max

Post

Does anyone have the flow numbers on any Q45 Stock factory heads? If so I would like to see what the Bench Flow showed! Flow numbers on heads that have been re-worked would be nice also! I would also like to see some or any Dyno numbers if any members have could someone please post!

RYANW501
Posts: 24
Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2011 11:22 am
Car: Stock 1995 Nissan 240SX. In process of vh45de swap. Can't wait!!!!

Post

are the pistons and rods the same for the 91 and 94.. and if so does anyone want to donate a rod and piston for my vh swap?


Return to “Q45 Forum / Cima Forum”