Post by
RicerX »
https://forums.nicoclub.com/ricerx-u125542.html
Tue Apr 03, 2012 11:17 am
Best way to explain the benefit of a CAI vs. SRI isn't necessarily the way the intake is made, it's the concept of cooler air vs. warmer air in the air-fuel mixture. (Any intake upgrade will likely yield an increase in power as they offer smoother, sometimes larger piping and removal of pieces of the intake that impede airflow in lieu of quieting down the intake - but for the argument of CAI vs. SRI, it is more about the air temperature)
Ever notice how when the temperature drops suddenly by a significant amount that you need to put air in your tires? It's because molecules in the cooler air condense. When air gets warmer, the molecules expand. With this concept applied in a given space, the cooler air space will have more air molecules than the warmer air space. Cooler denser air brought into the engine and mixed with fuel creates a more efficient and powerful combustion, therefore creating better power.
Just because a CAI brings in cooler air from outside the car than an SRI doesn't necessarily make it better. Certain CAI systems have tons of crazy bends in the piping in order to create an intake path that is accomodated by the design of the car. The V6 Altima Coupe suffers from the problem of there being no clear path for a CAI to be installed without significant alterations to the engine bay (battery relocation being one very large obstacle - a costly endeavor that wouldn't be deemed worth the time, effort, or money to gain 2-3 more horsepower).
I arrive at my point - for the AC, if you're getting an intake, get one with heat shielding. The K&N or AEM intakes are the best choices, imho. It's an alternative measure to create a CAI-like environment that proves to be effective enough for the $300-$400 they cost. My AEM opened up the top end fairly noticeably, and improved throttle response.