Post by
DrifterProdigy85 »
https://forums.nicoclub.com/drifterprodigy85-u30257.html
Thu Oct 29, 2009 5:03 pm
A 272/264 setup should give large midrange gains and become restrictive at high rpm. This is because the 272 intake is letting alot of air in while the 264 exhaust wont be letting out enough air. I always look at duration and lift as the width and hieght of the cam lobe. The more duration and lift will allow for more air in and out of the cylinder but the larger duration and lift takes longer for the valve to open which is why there is usually a loss in low rpm tq. Ive used HKS 264 step 1 cams, BC 264 cams, and Tomei 270 cams with my SR20. The HKS step 1 cams were a 264/10.0mm lift i think. They allowed a good bit of low rpm tq during spool up and flowed decent to 7000rpm. The BC cams were a 264/12.0mm lift. They lost some low rpm tq during spool up but gained more tq at peak boost and carried tq better to 7000rpm over the HKS cams. The Tomei 270 cams was a total change. The only tq gains came at 5krpm and held tq quite solid to 8000rpm. For a street only car id use the Tomei Poncams with the RB. It should keep the engine very responsive and make well rounded power numbers (matching tq and hp). Cams always make a difference with any engine. They increase the effeciency of the head which is gonna make more power being NA and usually even bigger gains with F.I.